Lozbo
Oct 21 2005, 02:37 AM
| | Is it only one type of xhtml 1.1 versus the three different types of xhtml 1.0 (strict, transitional-loose, and frameset)?
Is it 1.1 only strict? What are the differences or whats this all about? I have heard something about xhtml 1.1 but have not actually seen one (not that i know at least)...
Thanks! |
Reply
beeseven
Oct 21 2005, 09:45 PM
I'm not sure of the exact differences, but I think that 1.1 is still in a testing phase since there aren't different kinds of it. Probably not much noticeable changed since 1.0.
Reply
jlhaslip
Oct 21 2005, 11:57 PM
I think Xhtml1.1 is still is the works. It doesn't look like there will be the 3 DTD's either. The section you want to read on the w3c site is here. And here is a clip from the site: QUOTE XHTML 1.1 - Module-based XHTML
This Recommendation defines a new XHTML document type that is based upon the module framework and modules defined in Modularization of XHTML. The purpose of this document type is to serve as the basis for future extended XHTML 'family' document types, and to provide a consistent, forward-looking document type cleanly separated from the deprecated, legacy functionality of HTML 4 that was brought forward into the XHTML 1.0 document types.
This document type is essentially a reformulation of XHTML 1.0 Strict using XHTML Modules. This means that many facilities available in other XHTML Family document types (e.g., XHTML Frames) are not available in this document type. These other facilities are available through modules defined in Modularization of XHTML, and document authors are free to define document types based upon XHTML 1.1 that use these facilities (see Modularization of XHTML for information on creating new document types).
However, the Modularization of the xhtml will allow for the use of a "frames" module (?). There is more on the site, so have a look. Hope this helps.
Reply
Lozbo
Oct 22 2005, 01:54 AM
Yes indeed it helps, thanks for the link, ill give it a look, anyway, i started reading about this modularization of xhtml 1.0, but quite not understood it, i mean what i think it means is that you would be able to write only those modules, for example, a form, but without having to meet all other modules, so it wont be necesary declarations for items that you dont need in this form, including <html> and <body>, although this is what i understood, it does not seem logical to me...
Reply
arboc7
Oct 22 2005, 03:48 AM
XHTML 1.1 is only strict, if you want to call it that, whereas XHTML 1.0 is more of a transition from HTML to XHTML. The really big change in XHTML 1.1 is that the DTD (document type definition) modularizes the tags into similar sections. For full documentation, check our the W3's website: http://www.w3.orgGood coding!
Reply
Tyssen
Oct 22 2005, 07:38 AM
XHTML 1.1 has to be served as type application/xhtml+xml as it is ure XML. However, IE doesn't accept pages served as that; it only accepts pages served as text/html, so it is recommended not to use XHTML 1.1 and use 1.0 instead if you're planning on serving pages to IE browsers (either that or use a detection script which serves up a different mime type depending on browser).
Reply
jlhaslip
Oct 23 2005, 08:45 AM
So, tyssen, is xhtml 1.1 available right now?
Reply
beeseven
Oct 23 2005, 06:30 PM
Yep, you can use it. Just get the proper DTD and follow all the rules.
Reply
Tyssen
Oct 23 2005, 10:18 PM
Here's an article on how to serve up different mime types using PHP: http://www.workingwith.me.uk/articles/scripting/mimetypes/
Reply
Tyssen
Oct 24 2005, 12:10 AM
But before reading the above link, probably best to read this one.
Reply
Lozbo
Oct 25 2005, 10:08 PM
Yes i didnot quite catch it all you said, did not gramatically understand completely, Saint, but one thing is for sure, you do know how to put pretty pictures on the net:) (i really like yer sigs  )
Reply
Tyssen
Oct 25 2005, 11:59 AM
QUOTE(Saint_Michael @ Oct 25 2005, 03:31 PM) well from i found by other members is that 1.1 is the starting point somewhat for xhtml 2 but i guess you can say its the most cleanest version of web design coding you can think of it get rid of tags that are pretty much useless and take more time to code while the updated coding can do the same (more techniqual i think). but xhtml is more DB driven then putting pretty pictures on the net.
I dunno if it was the lack of punctuation, but that made no sense from start to finish.
Reply
Saint_Michael
Oct 25 2005, 05:31 AM
well from i found by other members is that 1.1 is the starting point somewhat for xhtml 2 but i guess you can say its the most cleanest version of web design coding you can think of it get rid of tags that are pretty much useless and take more time to code while the updated coding can do the same (more techniqual i think). but xhtml is more DB driven then putting pretty pictures on the net.
Reply
Recent Queries:--
xhtml 1.0 1.1 differences - 30.75 hr back. (1)
-
dtd strict vs xhtml 1.1 - 41.27 hr back. (1)
-
xhtml 1 vs 1.1 - 66.05 hr back. (1)
-
xhtml 1.1 vs xhtml 1 - 71.76 hr back. (1)
-
xhtml 1.1 differences - 77.16 hr back. (1)
-
find at least two tags html that are not valid in xhtml - 86.96 hr back. (1)
-
xhtml 1.0 vs 1.1 - 19.50 hr back. (13)
-
xhtml 1.0 difference with html - 91.65 hr back. (2)
-
difference between xhtml 1.0 and xhtml 1.1 - 91.98 hr back. (1)
-
xhtml basic vs xhtml 1.0 vs xhtml 1.1 - 98.78 hr back. (1)
-
xhtml 1.1 difference - 100.73 hr back. (2)
-
why xhtml 1.1 is better than 1.0 - 107.90 hr back. (1)
-
diferences xhtml 1.0 xhtml 1.1 - 141.35 hr back. (1)
-
xhtml 1.1 vs 1.0 - 74.66 hr back. (3)
Similar Topics
Keywords : Xhtml 11 Xhtml 10 Whats Difference- What's The Point Of Xhtml?
- (4)
- Whats The Best Code?
- www.bpsite.tk (32)
Whats you fav code?...
Post Or Get Method
- Explains the difference between the two. (4)
Ok, I assume you know the basics of forms in html. There are two methods that you can use when
creating a form in HTML. They are post and get, as in: QUOTE or: QUOTE One
thing is that if you don't specify a method, then the Web server assumes that you are using the
GET method. So what's the deal? They do the same thing right? Well, almost. You may have noticed
that the URL looks a lot longer after you submit a form that uses the get method. For example, you
may see something like: QUOTE http://trap17.com/gamer.php?name=god&a...laying...
Opening Hyperlink In New Window Using Xhtml 1.0 Strict
- (5)
My website (currently under construction) is all going well until I realized that the XHTML 1.0
Strict DTD does not allow the target="_blank" attribute. How would I find a way around this? I'm
used to using XHTML 1.0 Transitional, but I want this website to be Strict for a change. I would
really like it if someone here at trap17 can give me some css that allows them to be opened in a new
window. I have searched on Google and only found ways that include writing my own DTD (which I
don't want to do), use javascript, and use another doctype. All of those things, ...
Questions About Xml, Xhtml
- (3)
Hi, I like to know briefly about XML , XHTML and can be they be in replacement of MYSQL/MYSQL for
data storage?...
Xhtml Strict Links Tip
- A problem might accure (5)
If you try to put a link that has an & in your xHTML strict page, you need to change & to & in
order for the page to be xHTML Strict.. eg.. BAD LINK: CODE
http://jasamza.korisnik.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=7&sid=6c2e9120dcff6e0b83698c4aa7be929a
GOOD LINK: CODE
http://jasamza.korisnik.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=19&t=7&sid=6c2e9120dcff6e0b83698c4aa7be92
9a copy pasted &...
Create A Xhtml, Css3 Valid Gallery With Javascript ;part 1
- (0)
What were making In this tutorial, we will be creating a web page that can be used for a gallery, an
easy way of showing your portfolio of works or photography, etc. The page will be coded in XHTML
1.0 Strict and CSS3 valid, our CSS won't even have any warnings on them apart from one. So the
first thing we need to do is set up a base structure for the XHTML. Below is the code for this.
HTML html xmlns =" http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml "> head > meta http-equiv =" Content-Type
" content=" text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 " /> title >XHTML & CSS Gallery /t...
Wml / Xhtml ?
- for wap (6)
wml/xhtml who gvs more facilities to make a wap-community site?...
Transparent Roll Over Pictures
- Whats the code for tranparent pictures (4)
I dont want just transparent pictures i want a sort of rollover image. I see this done on myspace a
lot. A transparent picture that when you roll over is less transparent. I want that for my site. Go
to: http://boozkerstweaks.trap17.com/tutorials...ws_to_vista.php And look at the thumbnail at
the beginning. I want that to be a transparent image that when you roll over it, it becomes less
transparent. Ive seen this in HTML and CSS. Either way is fine with me. I looked on this site and
google, but never really found what i wanted. Almost everyone was only how to make ...
Html And Xhtml
- serving the right kind (11)
Right now I have a site, which I've made XHTML 1.0 Strict. I am sending it as
application/xhtml+xml to browsers that say they can handle it, and as text/html to all other
browsers. Anyway, I started thinking that I'd much rather send proper HTML 4.01 to browsers that
don't understand XHTML instead of XHTML pretending to be HTML 4.01. It's not really a
problem with IE, because it is made to handle badly written sites, but who knows, some browser that
can handle HTML, but not XHTML, may be (correctly) parsing CODE Hello World as CODE
Hel...
Need Free Help With Upgrading Websites For Church
- Must be versed in XHTML and CSS (4)
I recently helped a Father Andreas of the Ukrainian Orthodox Church in Denver revamp his
websites. He was happy enough that he passed on the information about my help to a friend. I have
received this e-mail, but I am unable to do much since I am not educated in XHTML and only know
basic CSS (still learning). QUOTE I want to update my websites from HTML with tables to XHTML
with Style Sheets. All of my websites are for my Church, the Hellenic Orthodox Traditional Church.
Would you be able to assist me with this project? In Christ! Symeon of Denver If any...
Embed Tag Valid In Xhtml 1.0 Strict?
- (2)
Is it? If not, could anyone reccommend how to get round it?...
Realtime/wma Player In Websites
- What's the code (5)
Alright, I'm making a website for a band. And he requested on the "Media" page that when you go
there, you see there sample songs. And next to it, it's like "Song - Play in - MWA - RealTime."
How do you make it so when you click, say, realtime, it takes you to another page and the player is
right there, playing the song? I suppose this is some kind of PHP but I'm not sure. Links,
code, tutorials, anything to get this working for me is appretiated....
Xhtml Strict Method For Submit/reset Buttons As An
- (1)
What's the proper way to handle submit and reset buttons? Using type submit and reset don't
allow you to replace the default button with an image, using the type image doesn't allow a
button to automatically act like a submit or reset....so far as I know. So How should I do this
when I want to use a custom image as the button? Code will be best way to explain, thanks! ...
What Is Xhtml
- What Is It And Why Use It? (27)
I was wondering what XHTML is because I have seen alot of sites that claim to be XHTML validated
rather than HTML validated. How does this compare to HTML? Why is it better? How hard is it to
master? How similar is it to HTML? Thank you for answering my questions! You should know by now
that What Is...? section is not to post question. Moving. Warning issued. ...
Encoding And Xhtml Requirements
- (2)
OK, so after reading a lot of contradicting information I decided to ask. How should document
encoding be announced? The W3C validator (or at least links from the same upon a missing encoding)
suggests the server should send the encoding in the content-type header. The problem with this that
I see is that you can't always make a blanket judgment about what encoding pages will be in. Is
it simply suggested to use .htaccess files (or equivalent) for this, then? I am led to believe that
most (all?) browsers will ignore a content-type meta tag. Is there another in-file o...
Xhtml Forms Layout
- all within the standars (8)
We all remember the good old tables right? When we used them to design or beloved websites. But
nowadays things have change a little bit, strict code format, css, xhtml and no tables. And so
when it comes finally to the design of a form, instead of having two rows (left row with the label
and right row with the input tag) and those rows aligned to look nice (left row= right aligned and
right row=left aligned), how can we keep order with our fancy style sheet? Thanks in advance....
Modify The Invision Skin Standards
- about the xhtml (1)
and hi, i just used the ipb1.3final.yeah.my skin is caliskinV6,got that from here ,since the cali3D
won't realease the new skin for IPB1.3 i just wanna to know if this is impossible,--modified the
skin to xhtml 1.0 or 1.1 standards. and you know the default skin of ipb is a comptnet,and the
Adding skin like CaliskinV6 is another comptnent,they are the different system,so i think there
would be the way to make the templates to xhtml stict. thank you,guangdian....
Strict Xhtml
- target atribute (4)
I have ran into this issue; Strict XHTML 1.0 does not support target atribute... so what should i
do? How will i use _blank pages with my stuff?...
Order With Xhtml And Css
- how do i improve (10)
hi!, actually i'm working on one site for my grandma's vivarium, i have been researching all
kinds of features about xhtml and css and it rocks, but i have got a lot of problems with the
arrangement, alignement and possitioning, specially when the content of tables differs and i have to
create a new class, and then i have to reorder all the padding, marging, width and heights commands
or even worse, nesting!. I lose the control of the layout. ok the question here is if there is any
way of doing standard tables(with divs) of content or layouts structures, without...
Xhtml Dtd
- can you set it up? (5)
Can you set up the document type definition in order to create your own tags in XHTML? (Just as it
happens with XML). I have been learning XML and DTD, and as i actually DO find it useful, i think
its even more useful the fact that a language (like HTML) already strongly accepted, has its own
structures defined. Its just sometimes you need to add a little adjustment here and there. So i
ask if theres a way to define this in XHTML, your structures of tags and attributes and all that. I
already know a coupple of sites which teach xhtml, but just have not found what i wa...
What Is The Xhtml 1.1 Code To Embed An Applet?
- (2)
I've been doing a lot of java stuff recently and some is pretty neat, so I'd like to put it
on the internet. I'm using XHTML 1.1 for all my pages, though, and according to W3Schools
doesn't exist anymore and to use object. It's not working, though. There are a bunch of
attributes ( http://www.w3schools.com/tags/tag_object.asp ) and I have no idea which things I need
to use. Which do I put for an applet?...
Xhtml Concerns
- just wondering (6)
i been reading about it i got somewhat an understanding of it but how can you clearly define as
xhtml when all it really is a html redefined to the point that its just trimmed down and little bit
added here and there or its just the lack of understanding of it that confuses me. well of course
im wondering if anyone is using xhtml or still using html or a combo of both? of course i need some
more info w3c don't help out much....
Wha's The Difference Between Xhtml 1.0 And 1.1?
- (2)
i learned xhtml 1.0 from w3 schools, but that was 1.0. what's new in 1.1? thanks in advance...
xhtml 1.0 vs 1.1
Looking for xhtml, 1, 1, xhtml, 1, 0, whats, difference
|
*SIMILAR VIDEOS*
Searching Video's for xhtml, 1, 1, xhtml, 1, 0, whats, difference
*MORE FROM TRAP17.COM*
|
advertisement
|
|