Styx
Aug 9 2005, 07:36 AM
| | I've basically stuck to Intel throughout the years as AMD hasn't been as popular as Intel over here, making it rather unavailable. guess it has to do with marketing...microsoft.
i have heard from my friends though that AMD has faster processors and it's prices are obviously more competitive!
i know that a lot of people have problems with their AMD's overheating, especially people who custom build them. this has to do with the cooling system needed for an AMD processors. i read that generally they should have at least 3 fans in the box, providing ample cooling for the unit. now they've come up with the super coolent fan which only requires one and you give it a coolent injectant once evry 6 months or so to keep it in tip top shape.
i'd have to say in my personal opinion that both are pretty comprable--just depends on what you do with them and how you load them. |
Reply
Dawid
Aug 9 2005, 08:47 AM
Definately Intel. Purely because I have an Intel Centrino based laptop and it is so cool, no regrets and apparently the AMD laptop technolody isn't nearly as efficient as the intel. I could be wrong, it's just what I've heard.
Reply
kservice
Aug 13 2005, 07:17 PM
My first computer was an IBM with a Intel 286 processor, then i had a Pentium 133MHZ, later a AMD k6 -3 450MHZ because AMD cost 50% less than Intel, and since this time i saw that the technology of AMD beats INTEL so I bought the AMD thinderbird of 1ghz, and then Athlon XP 1.8GHZ, but today's i want to buy low price laptop and INTEL have better options than AMD, for example in the Pentium M is a very good mobile processor, I know that the AMD Turion is better but it is more expensive too. kservice
Reply
alperuzi
Aug 13 2005, 07:42 PM
Intel does seem to have better laptop technology, not only that but generally better mobile cpus which include the PDA cpus. They are completely dominating the mobile market with and I think they have close to 90% market share. Their better power management is also why Apple chose to switch to Intel CPUs from the IBM PowerPC CPUs. On desktop systems however, AMD's Althon series are more efficient. AMD can basically keep up with Intel CPUs that run at nearly twice the speed! That alone shows how advanced the Athlon architecture is. I find it odd that they don't do so good in the mobile market which has grown just as big as the desktop market.
Reply
jerrylili
Aug 13 2005, 08:42 PM
Hi dudesd, ok i perfer AMD from a power perspective. Intel they are rippys, in teh news latley AMD sused Intel for briobing asian markets basically, because Intel hasn't had any new breakthroughs in teh personall PC procsssor indeustry, for god sakes they are still with Pentium 4, when they hooped from 1 to 2 to 3 in like 3 years.AMD on teh other had has made teh first 64 bit procssocr, even thought the computing world was NOT ready for it as, software wheren 't 64bit, after that Microsoft came out with an 64 bit version of windows whern they can do better but.... Intel is ok for most but don't get AMD unless you are going to teh top of teh AMD line other wiswe stick with IBNTEL. yeap, jerry jmna
Reply
machinamedia
Aug 15 2005, 12:32 AM
FuChelle
Aug 15 2005, 01:21 AM
I prefer Intel. All my family's computers have had Intel processors and at least 2 of them are still working fine and they're 7 and 5 years old. We had an older one than that but we sold it so I don't know how it's still going, but the 2 we still have are great. However, I have a friend who has just recently been having trouble with his computer running on an AMD processor and it's only about 1 year old. So, yeah...I will say Intel because just from that, I think they are more reliable. I also hear that AMD give off more heat than Intel processors, and so require more fans or something to cool them. So, that's another reason why I choose Intel...they're more efficient.
Reply
john826
Aug 15 2005, 02:32 PM
I well prefer Intel. I have have not had many problems with it.
Reply
mystmag
Jan 3 2006, 05:39 PM
The reputation that Intel presents is amazing...Their Pentium Line-up is the most powerful ever...having recently purchased a new computer, my computer comes with an Intel Pentium D Processor with 3.2 Gigahertz Processor and 1.5 Gigabytes of memory and 300 Gigabytes of storage...but of course, this computer wasn't cheap! AMD is of a cheaper, more family-friendly group, allowing people with poor income to purchase. Not to say that AMD is worse than Intel, they get just as much money as Intel, but they sell more chips. Their chips are less quality, so it doesn't cost so much to make, reproduce and manufacture them. But, that's just my view on Intel and AMD... Stephen QUOTE(Guevara @ Jul 13 2005, 08:05 AM) I prefer Intel, even thought they limit you on overclocking.........I have an intel mobo, and an intel CPU........for my custom built gaming rig (although at only 6 months old it's already outdated lol....which is why im buying some new parts over the next few weeks) anyway tell me what you think!!!
Reply
Cerebral Stasis
Jan 4 2006, 03:50 PM
I have to agree with the gamers here. Intel, from what I've been told (never used AMD, myself), is better for gaming, whether it be due to their processor builds themselves, or due to game optimization for certain Intel chips. Since I don't run servers or anything like that, I've never had a reason to try anything besides Intel, and I don't plan to, either, since it's walys worked very well for me (although the Intel CPU fans are weak and loud).
Reply
Similar Topics
Keywords : prefer amd intel- Amd Vs Intel
- see which brand of processor is more popular (57)
I personally preffer the amd chips as they give you much better performance when it comes to games
and that is the main thing i use my pc for. The amd's are also alot cheeper for a equvilent chip
performance. Some of the new Intels are good aswell but they are way over priced !!...
Sony Vaio Ux380cn Ux Intel Core Solo U1500 1.33ghz Micro Pc
- cool micro computer (1)
Try Mac Os X Tiger In Your Intel Machine
- About using Mac OS X on intel machines and even AMD (3)
Mac OS X Tiger on Intel Machines Mac OS X is best know for its UI and simple to use
Operating System. The fact that Mac OS X runs only on PPC(Power PC) made the Mac OS X very less
popular. Now Apple Inc. has ported its OS X operating system also to the Intel Architecture. The
Mac OS X for x86(intel) architecture works only in intel machines sold by Apple Inc. There are also
lost of patched OS X 86 which works on any intel machine. All you got to do is download and install
the OS X 86 on your machine and then apply the patches later. Applying patches manuall...
Intel Targets 32-core Processors In 2010.
- Intel Develops Processors with 32 Cores (2)
I've found an interesting article about new Intel CPU for servers. QUOTE The processor
code-named Gulftown will have “eight processing nodes” with four cores on each one, according to TG
Daily web-site, which may mean that the chip will consist of several physical dice. Every die will
sport four processing engines, 3MB unified level-three cache, while every core will have 512KB L2
cache. The dice will be connected to each other using “a ring architecture” interconnect technology.
Intel already reportedly has project named Keifer, which is focused around many-co...
Quad Core From Intel And Amd
- What do you get if you put together two dual cores??: A quad Core pro (7)
well another AMAZING! news from silicon valley: Intel and AMD are going to release in 2007 the
new QUAD!!! (yep you read it) QUAD!!! core processors!!! just
amazing!!!!, also Amd said that making fastest processors is becoming pretty
trivial, BUT the problem is: Where the hell they are going to put so many transistors? And the heat
produced?: simple, not putting them together, (as they came doing until now ), otherwise, they are
going to put them splitted, two blocks, each one have 2 cores ( 2 * 2 = 4) And the h...
Dual Core From Intel
- (15)
Intel dual core chips were tested and supposed to perform really well. It was said to do the
required task in half the time as a single core chip. I am not sure about the speeds but here they
are. Dual core at 3.2gigs and single core at 3.8. It is supposed to be released in the second
quater. /smile.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='smile.gif' /> Dual Core is
here. /biggrin.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /> ...
Apple And Intel?
- UHH WTH?? (25)
Recently my freind told me the apple and intel are offically working together? IS THIS TRUE AND IF
SO WHAT IS GOING ON!!!!...
Intel Based Macs A Reality
- Intel based Macs a reality (4)
I was roaming around the internet, and I suddenly found everybody selling the expensive notebook
macs for around $500 to $700 (used), I am currently tempted to buy one. So I went around
the internet looking for info and found in one forum, someone advising not to buy macs until mid
january because something big was coming, and I searched more and found it. The Intel based macs
are finally coming, I thought that they werent going to be a reality until mid 2006 or more, but it
is here and it will have a very low price tag. Read along on the following link. ht...
Macbook Pro Arrives
- Intel Chips in Mac Hardware (2)
APPLE INTEL CORES OUT Yes, it's true. The new Powerbooks from apple have arrives as of
January 10th. And yes, they do sport a new Intel CPU... now that that settles the rumors,
here's the BIG news: the new CPUs are DUAL CORE 65nm CHIPS! Supposedly running 4x faster
than the lastest and greatest powerbook chips from Motorola, these lappys also sport a radeon X1600
GPU! Here are the specs stright form apple's site: QUOTE 1.67ghz intel core duo(1) #
512MB 667 DDR2 - 1 SO-DIMM # 80GB Serial ATA drive @ 5400 rpm # ATI Mobility Radeon X1600 -...
Intel & Amd
- (3)
Intel & Amd . What do you preffer . Why do you preffer it ..... /biggrin.gif' border='0'
style='vertical-align:middle' alt='biggrin.gif' /> ...
Intel Changing Logo
- (0)
QUOTE Intel said Thursday that it would scrap its 37-year-old logo as part of a major rebranding
that will emphasize the chipmaker's shift away from its core PC business into consumer products.
The original Intel logo featuring a lowered "e" will be replaced with one showing an oval swirl
surrounding the company's name. The phrase "Leap ahead" will supplant "Intel inside," which
helped bring the company into the public awareness during the PC boom of the 1990s. The new Yonah
mobile chips will also be called core, instead of Pentium M, and be designated ...
Apple To Use Intel Microprocessors In 2006
- (3)
Yes we heard about it already on Newspapers.Many developers,Non-apple users,product developers are
happy to hear that apple finally decided to break out of thier hardware dependent restriction.Now
Mac OS can be installed on Intel processor based computers.Now what will be changed in future? 1.]
Many Windows users will migrate to Macintosh. 2.] Most of the viruses will be written for
Macintosh.Simmilarly many developers will write applications for Macintosh. 3.] Bill gates will
change his strategy for next operating system,possible changes like no product activation.Bac...
Apple Expected To Change To Intel
- (8)
It appears that Apple plans to use Intel chips instead of PowerPC chips in its new computers. This
could prove to be a very risky move by the company since all the programs and software would have to
be changed to work with the new computers using Intel and those left with the old PowerPC apples are
not going to be very happy. It's going to be interesting to see how the hardcore Mac users are
going to react to this move by Apple and many are probably going to leave Apple for good. I am
just glad I am not a Mac user or else this move would prove to be a very big h...
Looking for prefer, amd, intel
|
*RANDOM STUFF*
*SIMILAR VIDEOS*
Searching Video's for prefer, amd, intel
*MORE FROM TRAP17.COM*
|
advertisement
|
|
