I want to know what everyone thinks is the biggest issue today. What I mean by this is what is the most important issue to you as a person? I would hope that everyone can be civilized in discussing this topic. Everyone I believe has their own thoughts on this. I believe that our feelings on what is important come from our current life experiences. I think this is a fact because at differant times of my life differant things are very important. I would like to see what other people say before I mention what is important to me. Beth

Reply

Knowledge. Every has to know to get:

[+] the current news
[+] updated versions of a gadget
[+] a new gadget
[+] into a conversation
[+] a job
[+] money

and other big things that effect our lives.

Knowledge.

Reply

the biggest issue today is gas prices and the little green aliens, ok so only gas prices, here in the US (florida) they are nearing $2 a gallon, imagine having something that eats gas like say a hummer, try to fill the tank on that and youll spend close to if not over $100 on one tank.

Reply

for me, it would have to be attaining WORLD PEACE and eradicating POVERTY. it's always painful to see and read and hear about people suffering because of wars, because of poverty. the first is harder to attain with all the BAD politics (and politicians) involved, but the second is just hard but not impossible altogether. IF ONLY people can join hands, there will be less worries in the world.

Reply

Poverty, cancer cure, world peace...

Poverty - this has always been a big issue with me. To me, leaders whether it be the government, mayor, or president, are all talk. They never do anything it seems like.

Cancer cure - today I just got through with doing a 3mile walk for it. Seriously, I was about to cry right then and there. Almost everyone had a "In Memory of..." sign pinned to the back of their shirts.

World peace - I don't really need to explain.

Reply

I think that there a a lot of really big issues today. What I think is the most important though is education.

Without education, we will never be able to find a cure for cancer (or any disease for that matter). Without education, we will never be able to advance in technology. We will never be able to find a way to end poverty. We wouldn't be able to understand politics to be able to elect a good leader and politions (really, I think it's hard enough to understand now WITH an education lol).

So yep, education...then we can keep advancing to find solutions for all the other problems in the world.

Reply

What do I think is/are the biggest issue(s)? Well it's pretty simple.The world has so many big problems, but most of them won't be solved as long as the governments of the world continue to line their pockets will gold. With all of the money that they have, wouldn't they be able to feed the whole world a few times over?

They have all of these commercials and charities that ask people to send
money and all that to suffering countries, and yet, those countries are
still in the same state, and it seems that many people do donate to them. Is the money not going to the people in those third world countries? It really makes me wonder.

And about cancer. I think that they've found the cure for many cancers a long time ago, but they choose not to let it out on the market. Why? Well think about it. If they give the cancer cure to millions of people around the world, the hospitals would lose money on all of the medication and hospital care these specific people get.

Even the pharmaceutical companies would lose alot of money since they make millions off of medicinal drugs. When people are in good health, they don't buy drugs, and when drugs aren't being bought, they [ the pharmaceutical places ] lose alot of money. See what I mean? Wouldn't they rather make as much money off of people as possible?

World Peace? I think that there will be world peace soon. However, I have a feeling that the world peace won't really be what people expect it to be, or at least, what some people expect it to be. But this is just a personal view.

I consider these to be the biggest issues. I don't see a really above and beyond issue in the world today. Of course there are things like the gas prices, the Iraq situation, Canada's governmental situation, but these are mostly civil issues and not global issues.

But I digress.

 

 

 

Reply

I thought about answering to some of your suggestions first but then I decided that it would be hard to make the change from giving my opinion about other's most important issues to mine, so here's mine:

I think the biggest regional issue right now is the European Constitution, which will, de facto, replace most national constitutions. My problem with the european constitution is, among other things, that it makes upgrading the military abilities compulsory for all member states ("each member state has to increase its military power on a regular basis" or nearly like this) and that a not too well-known additional protocol to this constitution, which is supposed to be ratified by all member states in the same process as the consitution is ratified, includes the death sentence, even though the consitution clearly says that the death sentence is abolished in all member states: "Violent protests may be shut down with the use of force. This includes the use of both non-lethal and lethal weapon systems by the police forces."

Hopefully, the french referundum on this constitution results in the french people objecting this constitution as the polls say they'll do (from 52% up to 63% against and rising), even though this amount of people against it could not be reached without the European Nationalist Front [strange, huh? So many nationalist parties work together on an international level...], which I dislike almost as much as the constitution-to-be.

On a worldwide level, I think it's the Globalization which we have to be most concerned about. I truly believe that it's not bad that it's so easy to have contact to people from all over the world, to travel to the other side of the world and spread informations all over the world (well, at least most parts of it. This exlcudes most people in "third-world" countries and the poor people in the "western world").
The bad side about this process is that national governments, which are basically restricted to their own, small piece of land, lose their influence on laws, even though they are supposed to do what's good for their people, while huge, multinational corporations gain more and more power [according to Naomi Klein's researches in No Logo!, among the top 100 economic powers, there are only 49 nations but 51 corporations]. Corporations like Nike [or Adidas or Reebok or Gap or ... or ...], which let contractors produce their clothes by child labor in the Export Production/Free Trade Zones at costs of about $2 per piece (and wages of $2 per 14 hours working-day) really aren't the worst in this process. Even worse are corporations like Monsanto, which wants to control "only" 100% of the market for seeds by the year 2020. They achieved this for Iraq with a law passed by the "souvereign" Iraqi government, which forbids Iraqi farmers to use their own seeds and explicitely forces them to buy seeds from Monsanto.
But there are also some small rays of hope in this: Monsanto's corn seeds have been forbidden by the government of the Indian state Arda Pradesh (I hope I got the name right. The spelling might be a bit different but I'm sure about the Pradesh) because these seeds have a negative influence on local plants and are a financial risk to indian farmers. I hope that the decision of a democratically elected government on this issue will have a positive influence on the way other governments deal with this. Unfortunately, if the government of entire India does not agree with this decision, it might make Arda Pradesh look like a rogue state :/

Another positive thing about "the globalization" is that there are some people who use those things which enable the big corporations to conquer the world in a creative way - and resist the "corporate world" with websites like Indymedia or Wikipedia; cellular phones to coordinate different parts of large protests and comparatively cheap methods of transportation to travel to protests in a neighbouring nation, or, as a guy from an american organization for better/cheaper social serivces in the USA did, even to other continents

-----

inspired: yep, pharma corps actually invent illnesses when they discovered some new stuff while researching on a cure for a different disease. Some years ago, people got some sessions with a psychologist when they had depressions, nowadays they get some anti-depressants which make them feel comfortable for some time - but a not too well-known study showed that the suicide rate among people who were supposed to take these drugs is even higher than the suicide rate among normal people with depressions. Another thing is that people treated with antidepressants are more likely to be aggressive, because the pills just make them feel non-depressed without influencing into which kind of mood they switch. I'll stop here before I give away too much wrong informations because it's been some weeks since I read about this study...

iarkalwen: it's a great thing what you've done for this cancer cure thingy. keep it up [and I think it's not only necessary to do something about an issue one is concerned with but also to encourage people who are doing something to keep it up]

nexdesign: well ... I don't worry too much about gas prices because I'm usually going by bike (and therefore I'm more concerned about food prices). But if you think $2 per gallon is much: we spend about $1.50 per liter (-> about $6 per gallon, if I'm not completely mistaken) in Germany - and most people didn't stop going by car, even though we paid only $4 per gallon a few years ago. There's a reason why there are small cars which burn less than a gallon per 100km. Actually, our government gives tax advantages to people who use these cars and also give money to car producers so they keep on developing cars which burn even less...

Reply

Well I'd say that the biggest issue today is tryin to prevent TOTAL POLLUTION of our lil' earth and to think ahead for what we are going to use as a fresh-water resource in about 20 years. The thing is that with todays usage of fresh water and gas we don't have enough supplies even for 20,30 years because out climate is changing and looot's of fresh unsalty water that was frozen is now melting, which causes mixing with salt --> no more fresh water. The next thing is that with that melting of ice the whole earth is goin' out of ballance..and I could go on and on.
So if you ask me we should be conserned about what are we goin' to drink 20, 30 years in the future and try to find a way to stop global warming asap which would prevent these disasters from happenin'...

Greetz...

Reply

Initially, I agree. It has always perplexed me as to why those same locations are always needing our money. You would think that, with all the thousands of dollars that are donated, conditions would improve somewhat drastically. I have seen commercials that do show improvements, such as a local hospital or increased availability of medicine, or perhaps even a new school. But other than that, quality of life in those same areas hasn't improved. I have wondered whether or not the money that is donated actually makes it to those people, and although a few donation organizations take a few cents out of your donation, there are a few that do not. So yes, the money is making it there. But the reason those people aren't living in better homes or relocating to different areas is because of the very fact that they get free money through donations. With the money we give them, they aren't inspired to go out and actually try to improve things themselves through work. They can just sit around and donation money will pay for their next meal... maybe. But at least it is a chance for them -- they don't have to go out and look for a job or look for food. Do I think donating money is bad for these people? In large quantities -- yes. You can only start these people off on the right foot, you can't take it too far or they'll take advantage of it. Also, if all the rich people in the world donate all of their money to feed everyone on earth, that would be great, but a lot of other people would lose money, and it could possibly start an economic downward spiral right into the toilet. It just isn't a good idea.


If the cure for every type of cancer had been found, you would have known by now. These days the media tries to dig up every bit of information, ESPECIALLY information about medical and political policies. All the medical associations and pharmaceutical companies would be putting themselves at too high of a risk by witholding that type of information from the public. If someone found out, a lot of people would LOSE a lot of money. I believe your underlying logic is right -- money is the reason. But while they are trying to make it, they're not going to put themselves at such a risk that could result in bankruptcy. Besides, if everyone who had cancer was cured, the hopitals and pharmaceutical companies wouldn't lose enough money to put them out of business. The majority of people who seek medical treatment are NOT cancer patients. Plus, if everyone who had cancer was cured, there would be a whole lot more people alive and able to get hurt or get sick. I believe that in the long run, everything comes out even. Though a cure to a major disease like cancer (or HIV, for example) would start to bring up some population control issues, it is not a current issue as we have yet to see a cure for either of the two major diseases that I have previously mentioned.


I believe that 'World Peace' is what the world is like today. Yes, there is fighting still going on overseas and even domestically, but true, utopian world peace will likely never occur. Nor do I think that it should ever occur. Bad things tend to happen in "perfect societies." I think the world is currently in a near perfect balance of authority and diplomacy. If our troops weren't in active duty in Iraq I would say it is about as close to world peace as it can be. I should mention, however, that I fully support the invasion of Iraq. At any rate, yes, I agree that world peace is not going to be what people expect it to be. I just hope those people can learn to deal with it.

Reply