Alexius
Jul 2 2006, 08:09 PM
Nuclear Fission is the process by how nuclear reactors and nuclear atomic bombs (basically an uncontrolled nuclear reactor that is left to explode) work. Generally, at the quantum level, all atoms have both a strong nuclear force, pushing inward, and another force that pushes outward. The nuclear force is the force that pulls electrons towards the nucleus of an atom and allows them to continuously circle and orbit this same nucleus. This is why electrons (with a negative charge), and protons (with a positive charge), do not repel as we would imagine would normally occur with a positively and negatively charged magnet when held near eachother. However, let's say we fire a neutron (with no electrical charge) towards the nucleus of an atom. Since the strong nuclear force only acts on, let's say, protons or electrons that are near the nucleus with electric charges, the neutron would reach the nucleus of the atom and thus be absorbed by it. Uranium-235 is the material generally used in atomic bombs. This is because it is generally on the cusp between almost-equal strong nuclear and the force that pushes outwards. If a neutron was to be fired into the atom of enriched uranium-235, it would become a uranium-236 atom since the neutron is absorbed into the nucleus of the atom. When a critical mass of uranium-236 is present, the nucleus and atom becomes unstable, so the nucleus splits into two different nuclei of new different elements (i.e. Kr-92, and Ba-141). Fast-moving lighter elements (the fission products created), and these now released free neutrons are no longer being pushed by a strong nuclear force that is equal to the outward-pushing force, but instead the outward-pushing force is now stronger. Thus, all of this energy and these free-moving elements/neutrons burst outward in a tremendous amount of force, energy, and power: thus the atomic bomb. Because of the neutron hitting the nucleus, this also starts a chain reaction: three neutrons are relased from this reaction, which almost instantaneously transforms over to nine released neutrons, and then gradually going from nine to 27...81...243...n(3) and so on...each successive release of neutrons equal to three times the previous amount. This tremendous amount of energy release, as stated above, is what makes nuclear fission in its uncontroled state so powerful and destructive. I'm not sure if I fully explained all of the fundamental information regarding nuclear fission, so if there any other questions regarding it, please ask.
Reply
Paul
Jul 2 2006, 11:59 PM
This reminds me, I a presentation on nuclear fission last year for science... i found it pretty interesting! This image from Wikipedia really helps visualize the process
Reply
ghostrider
Jul 3 2006, 03:37 PM
Wow, that's a lot more than we learned in Physical Science this year. You forgot one things however, when the neutron hits the U-235, it starts a chain reaction which is what can make nuclear power so dangerous. 3 neutrons are released from the one reaction, and that turns into 9, then 27, then 81, then 243, 729, 2187, and so on and so forth, multiplying by 3 each time.
Reply
Alexius
Jul 14 2006, 08:42 PM
Yes, I had forgotten to include that. Thank you. Next up...Nuclear Fusion! Heh.
Reply
delivi
Jul 14 2006, 09:18 PM
Nuclear Fission is what that happened in Hiroshima and Nagasaki during the WWII. It caused a devastation that lasted for over 50 years. Still that region is affected. Lets think how the human knowledge destroys the Humans?
Reply
Alexius
Jul 28 2006, 07:36 PM
Yes. That is true, to a degree. It can cause destruction, but this is only because of human greed and human nature. In actual fact, just like anything else, nuclear fission can either be a weapon or be used for good. Nuclear fission could create energy for the general populace, or of course if it is left going in an uncontrolled reaction, it will cause a destruction seen in Hiroshima. Overall, technology is technology - even if we unlearn this technology, we will eventually invent something just as deadly.
Reply
salamangkero
Aug 21 2006, 02:08 PM
I'd most probably have the audacity to observe that, like all technologies, nuclear fission has both beneficial and harmful uses. Pretty much like how fire cooked or burnt the early human's food, this technology can either power one's TV or blast it up into pieces. I am, however, convinced that nuclear fission is, at large, a harmful process. Here on earth, we must be earnest in sustaining a suitably controlled environment to contain the energy from the blast in order to harness its power. Thankfully, though, nuclear fission occurs less frequently in nature than the primitive human's fire.
Reply
beastjordan
Aug 21 2006, 02:20 PM
Yes but sometimes there is cases like chonubol something like that and still today there are poisonus gasses in the air!
Reply
salamangkero
Aug 22 2006, 04:23 PM
It's Chernobyl, dearie, but, like I said, while things like that do happen, those are less frequent than, let's say, forest fires.
Reply
True2Earn
Aug 22 2006, 06:08 PM
Another thing that is interesting about the whole thing is after the chain reaction you have fission chips... not exactly a meal I'd like to eat. I know, bad joke... I just had to get that one in there. Anyway, other fissionable materials include U233 and P239. It was once believed that plutonium did not occur in nature until it was actually found, though in very small quantities. Oh, and synthetic radioactive materials are found in your everyday common smoke detectors, though you cannot make your own warhead with it
Reply
george4u
Nov 11 2006, 10:44 AM
QUOTE(Alexius @ Jul 2 2006, 09:09 PM)  Nuclear Fission is the process by how nuclear reactors and nuclear atomic bombs (basically an uncontrolled nuclear reactor that is left to explode) work.
Generally, at the quantum level, all atoms have both a strong nuclear force, pushing inward, and another force that pushes outward. The nuclear force is the force that pulls electrons towards the nucleus of an atom and allows them to continuously circle and orbit this same nucleus. This is why electrons (with a negative charge), and protons (with a positive charge), do not repel as we would imagine would normally occur with a positively and negatively charged magnet when held near eachother.
However, let's say we fire a neutron (with no electrical charge) towards the nucleus of an atom. Since the strong nuclear force only acts on, let's say, protons or electrons that are near the nucleus with electric charges, the neutron would reach the nucleus of the atom and thus be absorbed by it.
Uranium-235 is the material generally used in atomic bombs. This is because it is generally on the cusp between almost-equal strong nuclear and the force that pushes outwards. If a neutron was to be fired into the atom of enriched uranium-235, it would become a uranium-236 atom since the neutron is absorbed into the nucleus of the atom. When a critical mass of uranium-236 is present, the nucleus and atom becomes unstable, so the nucleus splits into two different nuclei of new different elements (i.e. Kr-92, and Ba-141). Fast-moving lighter elements (the fission products created), and these now released free neutrons are no longer being pushed by a strong nuclear force that is equal to the outward-pushing force, but instead the outward-pushing force is now stronger. Thus, all of this energy and these free-moving elements/neutrons burst outward in a tremendous amount of force, energy, and power: thus the atomic bomb. Because of the neutron hitting the nucleus, this also starts a chain reaction: three neutrons are relased from this reaction, which almost instantaneously transforms over to nine released neutrons, and then gradually going from nine to 27...81...243...n(3) and so on...each successive release of neutrons equal to three times the previous amount. This tremendous amount of energy release, as stated above, is what makes nuclear fission in its uncontroled state so powerful and destructive.
I'm not sure if I fully explained all of the fundamental information regarding nuclear fission, so if there any other questions regarding it, please ask.
it was great hearing all these things! thats remind me of my physics class i used to attend so i want to ask a liitle question here what is Atomic emission bassed on the study i had that atomic emmison is the escape of atoms from a suface of a substance when being heated so i dont cleary understand what it meant can you help me to explain what thats mean again in the perodic table hydrogen is consider to have both postive and negative features, thats is it is a both a negative and a positive element both how can i group interms of it electrical charge. finally we belive that atoms exists both how can we clearlly explain that why i ask this qustion is that i have some brothers that disturb me of that buth i dont have clearlly the knowlege of physics help me
Reply
Recent Queries:--
elements-neutrons - 491.56 hr back. (1)
-
nuclear fission uncontrolled - 653.59 hr back. (1)
-
nuclear fission negatives - 188.60 hr back. (2)
-
uranium-235 fission pros and cons - 1045.42 hr back. (1)
-
nuclear fission harmful - 1208.26 hr back. (1)
-
nuclear fission halmful? - 1342.26 hr back. (2)
-
what is fission - 1365.49 hr back. (1)
-
how is nuclear fission dangerous - 1545.69 hr back. (2)
-
kr-92 and ba-141 - 1885.53 hr back. (1)
-
what is fision - 1469.95 hr back. (4)
-
what is fisson - 1147.46 hr back. (3)
-
"what is nuclear fission" - 2038.06 hr back. (2)
Similar Topics
Keywords : nuclear, fission
- If You Live In Maine You Are Paying For A Nuclear Safety Adviser Yet You Have Had No Nuclear Plants Since 1997
(1)
Nuclear Power ?
Is it really bad for the environment? (6) I'm hearing from a few sources that nuclear power is bad for the environment. I personally
disagree, and think that we should try to convert as many coal-powered plants to nuclear plants in
the future, although nuclear power is non-renewable. Until we find good sources for renewable power,
however, nuclear power may be our best alternative. What is your opinion? If properly contained, is
it bad for the environment? (Of course if properly contained. All nuclear power plants have proper
containment measures in place.) If so, how?....
The Effects In Time Of Nuclear Radiations?
(1) QUOTE Nuclear Weapon Radiation Effects Blast and thermal effects occur to some extent in
all types of explosions, whether conventional or nuclear. The release of ionizing radiation,
however, is a phenomenon unique to nuclear explosions and is an additional casualty producing
mechanism superimposed on blast and thermal effects. This radiation is basically of two kinds,
electromagnetic and particulate, and is emitted not only at the time of detonation (initial
radiation) but also for long periods of time afterward (residual radiation). Initial or prompt
nuclear ra....
U S Military Mistakenly Flies Nuclear Weapon Over The Country
(11) Story All I have to say is that the US government is so damn lucky those weapons were secured or
all hell would break. QUOTE "Air Force standards are very exacting when it comes to munitions
handling," Thomas said. "The weapons were always in our custody and there was never a danger to the
American public." Of course there was no danger because nothing happen to the plane itself, but
if something happen to the plane itself they wouldn't be saying that right now. Of course they
would cover up that mistake and say terrorists shot the plane down or somethin....
North Korea Claims Successful Nuclear Tests
(32) On monday, North Korea claimed to have had its first successful nuclear test. Even south Korea
confirmed this, saying that north Korea had performed the tests. The test was performed
underground under 'secure conditions' at 10:36 a.m. (0136 GMT). The Pentagon, however has
yet to confirm the reports, although seismic reports do show intense activity around that time, in
the area the test was claimed to have taken place. Various other agencies, however, deny the
claims of seismic activity, including the U.S. Geological Survey's Rafael Abreau, who states ....
North Korean Nuclear Defense
(14) As you may or may not have heard, North Korea annouced the testing of nuclear weapons, to "protect
themselves from nuclear war soon to be instigated by the Americans". Liberal thinking: Last them
test it. As a defense system, all nations should have some way of protecting themselves in the case
that nuclear war does indeed break out. Conservative thinking: North Korea has a history of not
agreeing with the world, and they must not be a country that holds substantial nuclear power. So,
Russia wants to reinstate their group of N/S Korea, China, Japan, Russia, United St....
China Tests Nuclear Fusion Reactor?
(7) http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews....5-scienceNews-2 Chinese scientists have claimed that
they successfully fused deuterium and tritium atoms for about three seconds at 100M°C. If it's
true (which I kind of doubt, they have a tendency to claim breakthroughs that turn out fake), then
large scale fusion reactors are closer than ever. Fusion creates much less waste than fission, which
is what nuclear power plants use currently.....
Iran Ready To Transfer Nuclear Know-how
New Kid on the Block is Bad and Has a Big Mouth... (4) Iran Ready to Transfer Nuclear Know-How Just when I thought that this whole situation
couldn't get any worse. Iran's supreme leader has decided to advertise to the world that
their nuclear technology is available to friends and neighbors. Oh, and they've called for the
destruction of Israel. And um, they have told the United Nations to forget any ideas of sanctions,
reviews and observations of their programs. Does anyone else see the problematic potential of it
all? Debate all you want on the pros and cons of nuclear technology. I've worked with it (....
Nuclear Rights
(2) So, would an attack on Iran using nuclear warheads make the United States the most dangerous
government in world history? How can this argument have any credibility after what we know happened
with respect to the time before going to war with Iraq? Iran has a much larger, more powerful army.
Does the USA have the right to say who can have nukes, and who can't? If you read Fareed
Zarcharia's latest article, we shouldn't have this right. There were a few countries that
were allowed to have nukes after the 1960's cold war. The bottom line is that we kn....
Iran Nuclear Testing And What The Us Cannot Afford
(0) According to CNN, and The Associated Press, which I happen to get new snips every hour thanks to my
job, The United Nations has Passed a resolution that requires Iran to put an imediate end to its
Nuclear Development Program. Now I somewhat agree with this. I dont beleive that any Power should
have the ability to conduct unregulated testing of any Nuclear property, be it for Arms or Energy.
I do not, however, agree with the way things are going with this. I have my gut feeling that this
will be yet another Iraq issue, where they will stop for a while, allow inspectors ....
"the Rise Of U.s. Nuclear Primacy" - It's Really?
Whether there is a threat? (1) QUOTE PRESENT AT THE DESTRUCTION For almost half a century, the world's most powerful
nuclear states have been locked in a military stalemate known as mutual assured destruction (MAD).
By the early 1960s, the nuclear arsenals of the United States and the Soviet Union had grown so
large and sophisticated that neither country could entirely destroy the other's retaliatory
force by launching first, even with a surprise attack. Starting a nuclear war was therefore
tantamount to committing suicide. During the Cold War, many scholars and policy analysts believed ....
Germany Developing Nuclear Weapons
highly enriched uranium in Garching (19) I just found an article in a newspaper which is being distributed for free at my university, the
"Zeitung gegen den Krieg" ("Newspaper against the War") which actually scared me, knowing the way
Bavaria's government used to behave in the past: QUOTE Germany Highly enriched uranium
in Garching 2004 --against protests from the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)--, the
nuclear research reactor FRM II in Garching near Munich has entered service. It is being run with
highy enriched uranium (HEU). Delivery of russian HEU has been initiated by EURATOM . It ....
Iran To Resume Nuclear Fuel Research
(12) This was a breaking news... it says that the Irani President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad decided so : “The
Iranian nation and Government, with firmness and wisdom, will continue its path in seeking and
utilising peaceful nuclear energy.” these was his latest declaration... and in response , Tony Blair
the british PM said that britain will push actions toward Tehrran , as he is prepairing persuade
france and germany to take firm action toward iran represented in the referral of Tehrran's
Nuclear issue to UN security to consider sanctions. and of course this is supported by ....
Us Nuclear Weapons In Europe
Does the US realize cold wars over? (0) QUOTE This February 2005 NRDC paper pieces together evidence from an array of sources to show
that the United States is still deploying 480 nuclear weapons in Europe. Until now, most observers
believed there were no more than half that many still left on the continent. The continuing presence
of these weapons irritates relations with Russia, undermines global efforts to dissuade other
nations from developing nuclear weapons, and impedes NATO's post-Cold War evolution. The Bush
administration and the NATO alliance should address this issue as a matter of global nu....
Ancient Egypt Provides Key Storing Uk Nuclear Wast
Ancient Egyptian (1) Britain's atomic heritage discover the benefits of working like an Egyptian. The following
is a Summary extract of the article I have read in the Guardian QUOTE The United Kingdom
Atomic Energy Authority has to dismantle 26 research reactors and bury nuclear waste (that will
remain dangerous for thousands of years) in concrete bunkers and storage facilities The problem is
that the details of the dismantling and the dangers in handling of the plutonium, uranium and other
wastes are outlined on computer software that will become outdated in a decade. The ....
Why The Nuclear Countries Opposed Other To Get It?
Political Morality (12) Before I start I am with eliminating nuclear weapons from all. Why the nuclear Countries oppose
others to get the same. It was bitter to eliminate their threat before prohibiting other? Why they
make noise about Iran and North Korea? Why they don't mention anything about themselves or
Israel? They think that they are responsible and others are not. In fact who used the atomic bomb
to kill hundred of thousands of innocent civilian 60 years ag? If they say that Israel under
threat, I answer that Iran and North Korea under threat the strongest power of the worl tha....
Truefusion Gift Sig
be true to nuclear fusion (7) about a week you get your v2 sig ....
Nuclear War Scenarios
...who will start it? (26) I know, some time ago someone else started a debate on the same topic but somehow (I suppose it was
not intentionally) twisted the facts so that the message was "China threatened the USA". This
statement is _not_ true but the issue is interesting even without a current threat. So what
happened that makes me bring this topic onto the agenda? According to the Financial Times, the
chinese General Zhu Chenghu told a group of forein journalists that China might start a nuclear war
if the USA decide to attack China in order to protect Taiwan, which is considered chinese terr....
Smached Nuclear Submarine
(7) The NAVY released photographs of the smashed nuclear submarine San Fransico, here is the news:
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/01/28/national/28submarine.html the submarine hit a mountain because it
is not on their map! To quote the article: "Military officials have said that the submarine's
main chart was prepared in 1989 and did not show any potential hazards within three miles of the
crash site. Satellite images taken since then show the wedge-shaped outline of the undersea
mountain. But officials have said the agency that prepared the charts had never had the res....
Looking for nuclear, fission
|
*SIMILAR VIDEOS*
Searching Video's for nuclear, fission
*MORE FROM TRAP17.COM*
|
advertisement
|
|