People seem to think that the revenues raised by the games will more than make up for this outlay. Wrong. All the money from visitors will go into the local economy of London, fantastic if you live in London, ask countries such as Korea what happened to all the facilities they built for the games. 2 Billion is being spent on "redevelopment" of the areas around the new stadia. Great that will really help those of us in Yorkshire, 300 bloody miles away. Oh, we forgot that those figures dont include security.
I say make London pay for the games as no-one else in the country will see any benefit for the £113 per person that we will spend on the Olympics.
The Chancelor has just announce a raise in fuel duty of 5p a litre (Americans, take note of the next figure) bringing the cost of petrol to 93p a litre ($1.70c). Now the government says this is to protect the environment. I drive 16m a day to work. If petrol costs £5 a litre i will still have to drive 16m. Co-incidently the government has also announced an increase in the amount of money given to schools. So my fuel tax is paying for education. Fine, no problem. However, i can find you £8 BILLION to invest in education. Oh can we also have back the £400,000,000 that you spent on the Scottish Parliament building and the £900,000,000 you spent on the Millenium Dome?
I am really glad that i will spend £113 to watch the Ladies 10meter air pistol. Given that i have already spent £113 does this mean that i can go watch the events for free?
Oh yeah i forgot no-taxpayers which increases my overall contribution to about £150. YAY!
What really gets to me about the government is that its lies are so stupid that they would not fool, Dumbo, Head of the Guild of Village Idiots.
In England we have a tax called VAT, Value added Tax. A tax that is supposed to be levied on luxury items. If you notice the vast price difference between adults and childrens clothing this is due to VAT as, obviously, me having underpants and shoes is a luxury!
If Tony Blair said "Sorry, we are raising fuel tax to invest more money in the health service" fine, no problems. Dont insult me by saying that it is for the "environment"
that's my rant

