I like WinRAR more, it can release more kinds of compressed files.

Reply

I personally do not use WinRAR because it is shareware. I do not have enough cash to pay for it. Instead I use something called TugZip which supports quite a few file types. I like it and it is free and open source I believe. It can handle .rar, .7z, and more.

Reply

Winrar ,I use.
It can unzip yhe zip file,too...
so I think it's enough for me.
looool...

Reply

Definitly it is winrar, becoz there is support for iso,zip,rar, etc files

Reply

Depends on what you want. If you want high compression, use WinRar (or even 7zip), but if you want to distribute some files to a lot on people, use WinZip, because although not everybosy has WinZip, XP, Vista and some Linux distros natively support Zip files.

Well, there's my two cents...

Reply

Winrar is best them Winzip cause the amount of files it suports.. but the crompression power of each other is almost the same. Thats why I like 7zip, it have a very nice compression system.. that analyze everything.. for example.. if u compress 10 identiqual files with winrar.. it will compress all files.. but 7zip will compress 1 and for the rest will make just a mirror, so when you extract all 10 files will be there. And this isn't only for full files.. its work with segments to.. like if you compress 2 almost identiqual files.. 7zip will make a mirror of identiqual segments, thats why is the best one. The only problem is that 7zip generate more damaged files them others, but nothing that you cant fix making an inspection at the end.

About distribution, almost no one have 7zip, but you can make an SFX file when you are compressing.. resolving this litle problem

Reply

Wow. It's expensive man.

Reply

Well, since I do a lot of uploading, and I'm on ADSL, if I have to upload a big amount of data, I need to compress it... So RAR's aren't really an option... But, I don't use ZIP either... In turn, I use GZIP, it's free, and it compresses better than RAR or ZIP... Plus, since I do upload those files on servers, GZIP is natively supported by Linux, so I don't have to think if I'll be able to uncompress those files when I upload them... Since GZIP is used to compress single file, if I have the need to upload many files, I first put them in a TARBall, then GZIP... Some may see it as an inconvenience, but I see it as quite good compression, and free, at the same time

I have written a small archiving program for myself, to automatically use TAR and GZIP, and to create my own archives... I have it on my USB, so I can compress and extract files wherever I am, and wherever I need to... And I also use ZLIB, which is a GZIP implementation, to compress data in-memory... Quite good stuff...

So, my answer to this question would be neither

 

 

 

Reply

Winrar is defiantly a better program than winzip for a couple of reasons. Winrar has the capability to open and created zip files and rar files where winzip cant. Also a nice feature in winrar is that you can encrypt your information and even the file names in rar which cant happen in rar. So basically winzip is a zip only program where winrar is a program that does much more.

Reply

I think Winrar is much better, because Winzip don't have all the options to zip a file, i don't , i'm not a expert to talk about compress file programs, but i can say this, because I use the 2 programs, and Winrar do the things so much faster and better.

Reply