Of course wirnar, I always use winrar, one day I had winzip, OMG so much problems.

Reply

i never triped wirnar... o_O i only used winzip and it worked perfectly fine to me

Reply

I use WinRAR, works for most archives.
There are a few free programs withc are getting better like 7-zip.

For Zip archives , i use 7-zip i.s.o. WinZip.

Reply

I like WinRAR more
It can release more file format than WinZip and the .rar files are much smaller than .zip

Reply

I personally think that Winzip is the best program you can get. I no longer use Winzip because my free trail has expired. If you do not mind paying the money to buy it I would highly recommend it. If you do not have money like me you should get something else (I just use the unzip utility that comes with Windows because I am cheap and it works pretty good if you only handle .zip files).

Reply

ROAR!!

Er, sorry...I meant RAR

Reply

though I have used winzip first I like the capability and ease of use of winar more, I have both on my systems though, I guess two is better than one

Reply

at the beginning, i have use winzip, after winrar, I found that from file compress, files support, and the last one, it can build a .zip archive. and more important( if i'am not forget) it can open .tar.gz file. all is why i chooose RAR.

Reply

I like winrar much more as winzip, a lot of files are destributed comprimised with winrar so they become .rar files, while winzip cant read these files. IF you reverse it, winrar can read zip files too, so its at least equal to winzip. Also, I like the less commercial look of winrar, and it isnt filled with useless features as winzip is.

Reply

Winrar is more powerful it has sheel integrated menus that can bbe very handy. it has better compression algoritm and it has so many templates of compression method which can be useful for different situations. i have started using it after i saw that winzip couldn't unzip Rar files. Winrar compresses text files realy awsome and with high compression quality.

Reply