Add to Google

Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution - which should be taught in schools?

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4
free web hosting

Read Latest Entries..: (Post #38) by semeticsister on Feb 12 2006, 12:50 AM. (Line Breaks Removed)
And another thing: I don't know what I got myself into when I started this topic! Lol
Read the FIRST post of this Topic. - Express your Opinion! Contribute Knowledge :-).

Open Discussion > Trapped In Shit! [TIS] (www.trappedinshit.com) *NEW!* > The Vent

Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution - which should be taught in schools?

semeticsister
I am so sick of these poop headed religious bigots saying that Intelligent design should be taught in schools! The only claim they have to back up there case is this:

"A vast majority of America believes intelligent design."

This is so stupid. Just because a majority believe something, it does not make it true!

It's not like I'm against religion or God or anything, I'm just saying that intelligent is not a science; you can't use the scientific method on it or experiment with it. If it's not science, don't teach it in a science classroom! Simple as that.

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

JasperIk
Personally i think this should go into the debate forum, because its very debatable (and makes a good debate topic)

Science class is to teach science, NOT religion. If christians do not agree with evolution or do not want to learn about it, than they should go to a Christian School, or be homeschooled. If Intelligent Design was based on science, then yeah it should be taught in school, but its just a theory that is based on people's beliefs, not actualy scientific evidence.

People complain athiests are trying to force their beliefs onto others, well having Intelligent Design would be the same, atleast Evolution [an "athiest belief" rolleyes.gif ] can almost most definetly be proven, there for it is a theory, where as Intelligent Design is a belief, based on Belief.

Evolution should be the only thing taught, its not like it hurts you to open your mind a little. Intelligent Design is just rubbish in my opinion, Evolution actually makes sense...Intelligent Design is just saying believe in God, believe In God, Believe in God...thats all i hear from it.

 

 

 


Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

eee
agreed^^ very good topic


maybe they shouldnt teach either to resist conflict or altercations



in my opinion though they should teach both sides like this is what so and so and so is and vice versa so then they canhave good debates as long as teachers dont take it in their hands and exclude one or for some reason i feel there would be conflicts and altercations in the debate


great topic again.smile.gif

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

eee
QUOTE(JasperIk @ Jan 25 2006, 12:10 AM)
Personally i think this should go into the debate forum, because its very debatable (and makes a good debate topic)

Science class is to teach science, NOT religion. If christians do not agree with evolution or do not want to learn about it, than they should go to a Christian School, or be homeschooled. If Intelligent Design was based on science, then yeah it should be taught in school, but its just a theory that is based on people's beliefs, not actualy scientific evidence.

People complain athiests are trying to force their beliefs onto others, well having Intelligent Design would be the same, atleast Evolution [an "athiest belief"  rolleyes.gif ] can almost most definetly be proven, there for it is a theory, where as Intelligent Design is a belief, based on Belief.

Evolution should be the only thing taught, its not like it hurts you to open your mind a little. Intelligent Design is just rubbish in my opinion, Evolution actually makes sense...Intelligent Design is just saying believe in God, believe In God, Believe in God...thats all i hear from it.
*


i agree with the religion part somehow it is always popped-up into science topics(certain) for some reason don't know why prolly cuz of their beliefs and such...

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

Hamtaro
I think they should teach it. I mean, I don't believe in evolution, and I am FORCED to learn it. It's only fair to those who do believe in evolution to be taught something that they don't believe in. I can't stand learning about evolution. Personally, I'm also getting tired of hearing about the debates on this on tv.

QUOTE
I am so sick of these poop headed religious bigots saying that Intelligent design should be taught in schools!


By the way, don't insult religous people! Heck, I'm not extremely religous, but I still defend my religion. I sorta consider that comment to be offensive to me, as well.

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

kasm
QUOTE(semeticsister @ Jan 25 2006, 09:43 AM)
.. to back up there case is this:
"A vast majority of America believes intelligent design." This is so stupid. Just because a majority believe something, it does not make it true!

It's not like I'm against religion or God or anything, I'm just saying that intelligent is not a science; you can't use the scientific method on it or experiment with it. If it's not science, don't teach it in a science classroom! Simple as that.
*


1. In fact neither Creation nor Evolution nor Designl Intelligence should be taught in science classes or in school in general.

2. I am scientist to highest degree and I stress that Evolution is not science but belief. Evolution is Fiction and not Facts. There are known method of proof. There are nothing to proof this hypothesis . you can't use the scientific method on it or experiment with it either. There is definition to science and Evolution don't satisfy it. Evolution hijacked the science and is continuing to do so by shouting and the passive actions for the believer.

3. All science branches can be taught without Evolution. I wonder how was the Biology, Genetics [started by monk in monstry] Astronomy , Chemistry, Physics was taught before this Evolution hypothesis. Moreover Mathematics and Computer and Physiology, Anatomy, Medicine Health Sociology, Business Studies, Languages don't needs the Evolution hypothesis. How many great invention were made before it. How many scientist in past and now [included me ] are believer. The problem is the minority are winning by shouting and majority are loosing by their passiveness. It is minority dictatorship which enforces their belief[not the facts] on the majority [ Why we blame Hitler then]. They repeat their leaders blided and attack any opposition.

4. I was one of the pioneer students who studied Darwinism in 1959 [i.e 47 years ago] by my choice because it was optional subject. I considered it as the English novel "The lost world " [which about dinosaurs and missing link ] was in our curricula in that time too. I answered it as we quoted now what the other say but not what I believe. I got 27 from 30 [I don't forget things happened since 3 years old age. It is Gift from God].

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

switch
kasm, you know what you're talking about!

Some would definately argue that there is more concrete evidence for Intelligent design than evolution. My mate Scott had an incredibly interesting argument about it.

The argument is that:
-> stars cool down as they age (basic astronomy).
-> our Sun has only been cool enough to support life for X years. (sorry, not sure on exact numbers)
-> The minimum amount of time that it would take for a human to evolve from a single-celled amoeba is longer than X years.
--> So the Earth has not been able to support life for as long as it would take for humans to evolve.

Another argument is in relation to the saltiness of the sea:
-> Once again, with all factors tweaked in favour of evolution.
->The sea is actually not salty enough for the Earth to have been around long enough for human beings to evolve.

So, there's evidence for and against. Anyway, most of the argument for large-scale evolution is made by common people (i.e. not professional evolutionary scientists) using science as an excuse. Think about it.

Charles Darwin's theory of Evolution was Micro-Mutational. (Meaning consists of many small variations in genetic code passed on from generation to generation) These micro-mutations allow creatures to adapt in small ways, giving them a slight upper hand. Not changes them completely so that they can dominate their territory.

And then there's the fact that everything in nature fits together so beautifully. Random Accident? I think not.

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

saga
QUOTE(kasm @ Jan 25 2006, 11:52 AM)
[b]1. In fact neither Creation nor Evolution nor Designl Intelligence should be taught in science classes or in school in general.

*




then what should be taught in science classes which will touch the topic of the beginning of man? or even the progress of life itself?

i think i will stick to evolution becuase religion is a tool for oppression for the elite.. and beside evolution is the closest to the facts.... rather than pure idealism which is the root of religion.. maybe schools should teach materialism smile.gif the one from marx smile.gif but of course he is a communist that would enrage a capitalist state if such idea is taught in schools hehhehehehe

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

kasm
QUOTE(saga @ Jan 25 2006, 07:38 PM)
then what should be taught in science classes which will touch the topic of the beginning of man? or even the progress of life itself?

i think i will stick to evolution becuase religion is a tool for oppression for the elite.. and beside evolution is the closest to the facts.... rather than pure idealism which is the root of religion.. maybe schools should teach materialism smile.gif the one from marx smile.gif but of course he is a communist that would enrage a capitalist state if such idea is taught in schools hehhehehehe
*



1. Saga, it is not necessary that tiny point , "the beginning of man?" since nobody can approve his/her story. It is a beleif so has different version. So I suggest we have to make it out of school for church, media , books and clubs. If some people can not believe the story of Genisus happened 7 thousands year ago. how they can trust and believe fantasy stories alleged happened billions of year?. Nobody is thinking without prejeduce, can believe that an big bang explostion can create a life. It did destructions and may be if it happened initiated the universe. Yes the universe is expanding but not mean it according to big bang theory. Scientifically can not be proved. It fact if you don't know there are many theories compete with the big bang theory. Moreover until now nobody could create a tiny living cell from scratch. THEN THAT WHAT I SUGGESTED THAT WE LEAVE IT TO OUT OF SCHOOL AND WE WILL NOT LOOSE A LOT BY DOING THAT.

2. Obsession is happened in history before the relegion. What Alexander did. What the Roman and Persian Empire has done?. What Jenkis Khan did? Etc etc. So we have to not blame the relegion that make it better but not and absolutely dark. Read history ofv Europe before Christianity. Read history of Africa and the tribes who diminish others. Anyhow this point out of the this thread'd topic but to reply to saga. Morever my suggestion is to leave relegion and Evolution out of schools.

3. Materialism and Idealism can be taught in philosphy classes where some student will choose it. Because they are belief. The Logic only can be studied for all because it is the father for Math which other sciece branch depends. Also the Logic can teach students how to prove and argue the right way.



Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

heavensounds
I think that the whole evolution thing is not true or is a matter of belief...so if people are sooooo against putting religion in school than i don't see any reason why evolution and other scientific crap should be there...cos' if you ask me it is all a matter of belief!

Material evidence or experience is not something that i'd completely trust, because all these things are percieved with our 5 senses and those can be vary tricky sometimes...if you melt wax it changes completely and everything that you can sense with 5 senses is changed but you still know that this is that same wax!

How is that? science is goin to talk about molecules and other bullshit we cannot see unless we use certain metods which were also invented in human mind that could be wrong! So..i don't see why should i turst science and why should i learn of it in schools...

greetz

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

Latest Entries

semeticsister
And another thing: I don't know what I got myself into when I started this topic! Lol

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

semeticsister
First off, let me tell you all that I believe in intelligent design, but RELIGION DOES NOT BELONG IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.

I'd like to say that in school, we are taught facts, right? Why should science be any different? In history, they don't teach us that George Washington's mother was a red marshmellow because its not true. In English, they don't teach us that "orange" is spelled with a "t" because its not true. In Math, they don't teach us that two plus two equals 3,987,025,706 because its not true.

So why, I ask you, WHY should we be taught a theory that has no basis in fact, cannot be tested or experimented on using the scientific method? Even if evolution is not true, at least there is more proof of it than intelligent design.

I'm not implying that i.d. is not true, nor am I saying that it is false, but I'm just saying that when it comes to a theory that is in a gray area such as i.d., it does not belong in public school.

And another thing, these bigoted people complain that evolution being taught it "forcing the religion of atheism on their children".

WTF?!

Atheism is NOT a religion. It is the complete ABSENCE of religion.

Before people start spewing their corrupted theories, maybe they should, oh i don't know, GET A F**KING CLUE.

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

Thorned Rose
Just to put some two cents in
Earths Daughter, thats a good point about evolutionists not coming knocking on your door. And an important point being that evolutionists are not actively forcing anything on anyone. Science is about proving how something works and proof speaks for itself. Religions must constantly bombard you with their beliefs to 'convert you' such as door knocking (the Jehovah's Witnesses around here just won't give up no matter how many times we send them away - very annoying).

One thing I would like to point out is that Richard Pearse was actually the first to fly (about 9 months before the Wright brothers) but often isn't considered so because 1. He's not an American (a New Zealander instead) and 2. He crashed into a hedge so he himself didn't consider his flight a success but he did fly before the Wright brothers.

sammaye, athiest (aphist) means you don't believe in anything not just that you don't believe in God.

Souls for certain do exist but to say that they are separate from science is silly. Everything is science - science explains the universe and just because science hasn't yet explained them doesn't mean they have no scientific basis. Souls could be explained as being a type of energy that can hold a persons experiences. Life needs a soul to live just as it needs life force (or Qi [Chi]) to glue everything together.Certainly a person is in part the sum of all their experiences but that includes past lives. The soul evolves as well.

People keep asking what the meaning of life is - there is no meaning to life - it just is. It may not have a meaning but it does have a point and that is to continue and become better i.e. evolve, not just physically but in the soul as well. Don't ask yourself why you are here, ask yourself "what can I do to make myself better?" - that is the point.

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

sammaye
I am very aphist (or how ever you spell it, jus some one who dont believe in god) I believe in science and that everything has a proven scientific explanation behind it...even these people who say they can communicate with ghosts.

Personnaly I thinnk all this is jus religion trying to hold on to something that they cant. We are not in the 19th century where religon controls all..as for chrsitians they should really let go of their power. I know this may be very insulting but I see the catholic church as very self centred on gaining and keeping as much power as possilbe...I have come to this reasoning via doing history if you notice a lot of wars and such like in hte past was cos of christianity in one way or another..

this is the same as evolution all the christian church is trying to hold on to censoring ppl but all they are doing is telling the world they are hipocrites..i.e. that guy in italy who said the sun was the centre of this solar system so the catholic church executed him...and only like 10 years ago said that he was right....

As for souls..I believe in no soul I believe that who we are comes from what we are...what we are taught and who we live with and what environment we existed in. I believe we are who everyone and our selves make us...we do as others beofre us have done before us...we act as humans would always act...also unlike religon we are not the rulers of this world...the world rules us and its shows us everytime a hurricane sweeps over or a earth quake happens or something...

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)

Earths Daughter
As several people here have said, if you teach one religion's viewpoint on creation, you have to teach them all. I don't think the Christian Vocal Minority really want that. What they want is for everybody to be taught what they personally believe.

But if you're not taught ID in school, can you really go for very long without learning about it elsewhere? You will hear about it from TV, radio, family, friends, Jehovah's Witnesses and others knocking at your door, and of course, churches, if you ever set foot in one. Science believes in evolution, Religious people believe in ID. When was the last time an evolutionist came knocking at your door to discuss science with you? I don't know about you, but in my case, it's never happened. If Evolution is not taught in schools, kids won't get much, if any exposure to it at all.

Before airplanes were invented, a lot of religious people said that it was impossible for man to fly. If they had stopped teaching anything that had to do with the possibility of flying, would we have airplanes today? The vast majority of people knew man couldn't fly, and they believed it. And yet they taught science in schools anyway, and eventually a couple of brothers from Dayton, Ohio proved what most people knew and believed was wrong. And let's not forget that at one time everybody believed the Earth was flat, and you could sail off the edge of it, and the moon was made of green cheese, etc. Just because a lot of people know and believe something, doesn't mean it's true. Science has continued to be taught and studied, and has proved a lot of such knowledge and belief to be wrong. But sometimes science has been proven wrong. Let's not forget the "mythical" kraken (giant squid) that scientists said didn't exist.

So maybe science will prove evolution someday, and maybe it won't. Actually, I take that back. If science is no longer taught, it will not be able to prove any theory that religious people have is wrong. So we see the convenient thing for religious people who don't completely believe in ID would be for evolution to no longer be taught at all. But if ID is not taught in schools, people will still hear about it from other sources. So let's be fair, and teach science in science classes, and religion in religious classes.

And by the way, the two are not necessarily exclusive. Evolution can only explain where people's physical bodies and thinking abilities came from. It can't explain where souls come from, if you believe in souls. Maybe when the Bible says God created man in His own image, it meant spiritually, as in having a conscience and a sense of right and wrong, something animals don't have. Unless you believe that God has a material body and looks just like a normal human being physically?

Comment/Reply (w/o sign-up)



Got an Opinion! Express your Views! (no registration):-
Add your Reply/ Opinion/ Views/ Comments/ Suggestion/ Questions/ Queries etc.
Posts with decent grammar & English will be accepted and please refrain from profanities.
For asking a Question, We recommend you to sign-up (for free) so that you can track the topic easily.

Nature of your Post*: Opinion/ Reply/ Comments
Question/Query
Feedback to us.
       
Name   Email
Title/Question*

Pages: 1, 2, 3, 4

Searching Video's for intelligent, design, evolution, taught, schools




advertisement



Intelligent Design Vs. Evolution - which should be taught in schools?