Cs: Source Vs Cs 1.6

Ascaron

Feb 20 2006, 04:31 PM

What do you think? Currently Counter Strike 1.6 is being played by almost 10 times as many as Counter Strike Source. I made the switch a couple of months ago and I now enjoy Source much more than 1.6.

But the community generally disagree, if this is because they havnt tryed it and gotten used to it or if they just hate it. I think that source just needs a bit ajusting and such, and maybe have an include way of turning down the graphics so people with average pc's dont get fps drop.

Its not quite there but I definitly think that Source will take over for cs 1.6 just as 1.6 did over 1.5, it might take a year but it will happen despite the troubled relationship some players have towards change. Counter strike needs source to remain attractive to sponsores and investors, aswell as the crowd, people need something good to look at to consider Counter Strike as a good profesional game.

Now, whats your take on this?

nelarozi

Feb 20 2006, 05:02 PM

I have the both games at home and i usally play counter strike source. Maybe more people are playing counter strike 1.6 because it is cheaper or they just don't have a very good computer to run source on. The games a basicly the same exept in source uses a great game engine and haves some extras

bladeron

Feb 20 2006, 05:12 PM

well, i do have both the games installed on my pc but i have been playing counter strike 1.6 since the day it was launched and have not yet stopped playing it
may be some time i might get tired of the multiplayer games in counter strike 1.6 and think of switching back to source

SqlByte

Feb 21 2006, 10:46 PM

i played both of them for some time. i like counter strike, but cs source sucks, its not like other counter strikes. version 1.6 is not bad but i dont like it, the best version and one that i played the most is 1.5, and when i playe in some net caffee i usualy play 1.5. i even had my own version of 1.5

eh.. good ol' times of counter...

amitojduggal

Feb 23 2006, 11:00 AM

i have a slower pc, so i like CS 1.6 more then CS source. And also it is very easier to find a server with CS 1.6 then with source.

oazisklub

Mar 19 2006, 07:55 AM

Hy. I read your posts, and I agree with you. The Counter Strike 1.6 it`s more popular, cause a lot of people has a slower computer, and for they the Counter Surse it`s a a "big" game. Another fact, it`s teh Counter Strike 1.6 was very popular for a long time, and lot of people alredy falled in to this habit, and they alredy don`t want to change this game, because they like it, and it`s so funny too, like Counter Surse.

ataylor

Apr 8 2006, 09:09 AM

I actually disagree with the point 'cs 1.6 is more popular', because its not. Why would they call css the 'most widely played online game ever'? But fair enough, some people do play cs 1.6 more than css because there computer is not good enough, but most of them will of upgraded. CSS is not that much anyway, you can get it for around about 20 pound, and i'm sure the majority of people can push there selves to get that much money. CSS does not have that much of high requirements to play anyway, so prob a rubbish computer might be able to play. I ahve played cs 1.6 for bout a year, and then when css come out, I had bought it. Sure, back then not many peoplr were playing on it now, but look at the facts. There are millions who play css now everyday.

Cool_Freaker

Apr 8 2006, 11:02 AM

Is it really "millions"? Anyway, I *stopped* playing CS1.6 because I was finding too many of my favourite servers were switched to CSS. My computer can easily run HL2/CSS but it's a matter of going out and buying the game again - not to mention a lot of the CS community (at least initially) said that CSS was rather buggy. One of my friends claimed to have killed 5 people through a solid wall once.

I haven't found HL2 to be all that cheap to buy yet, even though it's been out a while. Apparantly DoD:S hasn't managed to pull the expected numbers either - all in all a disappointment perhaps?

Florisjuh

Apr 8 2006, 03:11 PM

My clan has various (succesfull, I might add) squads in both CS 1.6 and CSS, yes, the games might both start with "Counter-Strike", yet Source is a lot different than 1.6, seeing it isn't just a graphical upgrade as many gamers tend to believe. For one, CS 1.6 is very old, and the game runs on almost any computer nowadays, while Source requires you to have 'quite a rig'. The ability to play arround with crates and stuff give Counter Strike Source another dimension, because you can use them against the enemy (by hiding behind them, while in CS 1.6 all camper spots are well known). Also, I think Source is a lot more realistic than 1.6, seeing 1.6 maps are like "empty shells", with that I mean that the maps only purpose is to play online, while in source the maps look like real city's

zach101

Apr 14 2006, 04:53 AM

QUOTE(amitojduggal @ Feb 23 2006, 04:00 AM)

i have a slower pc, so i like CS 1.6 more then CS source. And also it is very easier to find a server with CS 1.6 then with source.

Lol? your joking right? On CSS and CS 1.6 its extremly easy to find a server. So many people play both now i really dont think it matters its what ever you prefer becasue ALOT of people play css so if you wanna make the switch dont let the idea that "not enough people play it" hold you back.

Latest Entries

iGuest

Jul 1 2008, 04:04 PM

Well I like both games but if I still played CS I would probably keep playing 1.6 because of the nature of the game and the "just plain awesome game play"

But I don't play CS or CSS anymore, I play Team fortress 2 :-)

-reply by Sup4hkeela

Reyes

May 1 2008, 01:42 PM

The idea is that Counter-Strike 1.6 is used at big competition like WCG

and the best players in the world are playing Counter-Strike 1.6 . Counter-Strike Source will need a long time to rise at Counter-Strike 1.6 level even that it's better then him .

iGuest

Apr 30 2008, 02:25 AM

I use both as well, but honestly? I think source is by far better. It's got more skins, better graphics, a good number of players/servers and there aren't many HUGE adjustments from 1.6. Once I switched, it only took me about one hour to get used to it. Regarding the idea of buying the game all over again, well, isn't it like that with all games? When you saw CS 1.5, you knew there would be a 1.6, right? well there you go. Source is like "counter strike 2". There's always going to be a next version, that really should be obvious.

zgclan

Apr 27 2008, 06:07 AM

I've got both on my steam account, gotta say that Counter-Strike: Source is way much better than 1.6 reason being that source is played by more people, the maps are more complex (especially the surfmaps [my fav]), and of course the graphics are ten times better. Oh and if ur a fpsbanana fan u would know that there is 8 times more custom skins for CS:S.

iGuest

Apr 25 2008, 10:55 AM

Source
Cs: Source Vs Cs 1.6

People have different opinions. People who start on 1.6 might like it better because they have gotten attached to it and used to the gameplay.. So then source is a completely different game but with the same basis.

Me? I started on source so I preffer it. I played 1.6 and couldnt stand how **** it looked and I sucked ass at it because I was used to source, but everyones opinion is different I guess ^^

Source ftw though =P

-reply by Danglies

ADD REPLY / Got an Opinion!	Remove these ADs!	RAPID SEARCH!	Free Web Hosting	[X]
Express your Opinions, Thoughts or Contribute more info. to help others. Ask your Doubts & Queries to get answers, So that "Together We can help others!"	Register FREE for AD-FREE forum, Create your own topics, Ask Questions, track topics, setup subscriptions & notifications and Get a Free Website w/ Email and FTP.		500MB Space No Ads, CPanel, FTP, PHP, MySQL, EMails - 100% FREE