thanxxx man

Reply

I agree with alot of you, i am an AMD fan, I upgraded my single core amd to a dual core amd ,and i noticed the difference right off.

Reply

Traditionally AMD processors have been good for pixel-rendering and bitmap-buffering purposes.
This includes gaming (faster pixel generations), compositing, video editing, presentations and some multimedia applications.

Intel is more geared towards calculative and computing purposes..........e.g. vector applications like Corel, Illustrator, Flash work better on Intel processors. 3D application batch-rendering also works better with Intel CPUs.
These are calculated and computed processes.
Also for server-based usages, Intel is preferred over AMD.

HOWEVER, with the latest processors in both brands, these differences are not much noticeable, regardless of the benchmark tests.........unless the task at hand is of a large scale (where loss of few seconds per frame could result in a loss of many hours/days when you have thousands of frames to be considered).

Reply

I have to disagree with you AMD fans, I am an Intel Fan. Been Intel since my first 286.

I feel, that Intel Processors are superior (from what I have seen) in almost every task. Such as Word Processing, Photo Editing, Video Editing and Gaming.

I Think AMD Processors take to long to initilize when using windows. I am using an Intel Based MacBook and it is great, everything I do runs smoothly and it never freezes (but thats not really down to the processor). I also find that the Intel Dual Cores work better as I think it has a better process management than the AMD which fills one core and then moves on to the next while the intel distributes it evenly.

Reply

I prefer intels but just because it's what everyone recommends...

In the past my understanding was that AMD was best for gaming but lately everyone says Intel is so it's hard to really know what is really better.

At the moment I would just hang out with the dual core instead of quad core though due to prices....Quad costs more now but when it's actually needed it will be much much cheaper.

Reply

Im currently using an AMD 64 X2 5600+... its doing its job and its a very decent processor for games... It can make some noise when its hot inside, but it wont make it run slower... I voted for "the best performance".. since they're both good processors and I didnt have any big complaints while using one of them.

Reply

AMD processors are maybe good at playing big games. But AMD is not good enough to run big programs like Solidworks or the other graphic programs. So I decided to stay in Intel processors. My old Intel Core 2 Duo T7100 is still running every programs and games.

Reply

I don't really think there is much difference between the two in processing normal jobs (or at least i can't see anything as such),
but as far as gaming is concerned,(it is one of the few fields where there processing power can be compared), i think AMD is better than Intel...i have seen it myself...
i stay in a hostel and we all have our own PCs...most of us do not use graphics cards, and we all have 1Gb of ram..so now it comes to the processor and of course the motherboard graphics chipset.
I have seen that AMD PCs run games better than Intel one's. (almost the same configuration except the processors)
NFS most wanted was run by most of the AMD PCs satisfactorily...but intel one's failed to load it..even at lowest graphics config...
even FIFA08 is run better by AMD PCs.
but the credit may also go to the asus motherboard in AMD PCs used here, which has NVIDIA graphics controller while the Intel PCs have their own integrated intel graphics controller...
but anyways i am an AMD fan....

Reply