MooTools is a compact, modular, Object-Oriented javascript framework designed to make writing extensible and compatible code easier and faster. MooTools lets you get the job done efficiently and effectively.
It is slightly based on the powerful Prototype javascript framework, of which Scriptaculous runs on.
(But frankly, I dislike Scriptaculous due to its large file size = slows down page load time. The same effects could be achieved using Mootools which is much much much smaller in size (about 30kb compressed with other plugins included)) Moreover, you can select the only modules you want (thus reducing file size) because Mootools is modular.
Seeing is believing. See for yourself what can be done with Mootools.
It first started as the popular Moo.fx javascript effects library which boasts its 3kb file size and powerful effects
Moo.fx became so popular that its creators decided to lay out a full-featured javscript library. Mootools is currently in version 1.1.
Even sites like Ubuntu.com and Joomla.com use Mootools
Now on to my tutorial: How to create Accordion effect with Mootools
First, we create a HTML skeleton of your webpage
CODE
<h3>
The Mighty Accordion
</h3>
<div id="accordion">
<h3 class="toggler atStart">
History
</h3>
<div class="element atStart">
<p>
The first suggestion that all organisms may have had a common ancestor and diverged
through random variation and natural selection was made in 1745 by the French
mathematician and scientist Pierre-Louis Moreau de Maupertuis (1698-1759) in his work
Venus physique. Specifically:
</p>
<blockquote>
"Could one not say that, in the fortuitous combinations of the productions of nature,
as there must be some characterized by a certain relation of fitness which are able
to subsist, it is not to be wondered at that this fitness is present in all the
species that are currently in existence? Chance, one would say, produced an
innumerable multitude of individuals; a small number found themselves constructed in
such a manner that the parts of the animal were able to satisfy its needs; in another
infinitely greater number, there was neither fitness nor order: all of these latter
have perished. Animals lacking a mouth could not live; others lacking reproductive
organs could not perpetuate themselves... The species we see today are but the
smallest part of what blind destiny has produced..."
</blockquote>
<p>
In 1790, Immanuel Kant (Konigsberg (Kaliningrad) 1724 - 1804), in his Kritik der
Urtheilskraft, states that the analogy of animal forms implies a common original type
and thus a common parent.
</p>
<p>
Charles Darwin's grandfather, Erasmus Darwin, hypothesized in 1795 that all
warm-blooded animals were descended from a single "living filament":
</p>
<blockquote>
"...would it be too bold to imagine, that all warm-blooded animals have arisen from
one living filament, which THE GREAT FIRST CAUSE endued with animality...?"
(Zoonomia, 1795, section 39, "Generation")
</blockquote>
<p>
In 1859, Charles Darwin's The Origin of Species was published. The views about common
descent expressed therein vary between suggesting that there was a single "first
creature" to allowing that there may have been more than one. Here are the relevant
quotations from the Conclusion:
</p>
<blockquote>
"[P]robably all of the organic beings which have ever lived on this earth have
descended from some one primordial form, into which life was first breathed." "The
whole history of the world, as at present known, ... will hereafter be recognised as
a mere fragment of time, compared with the ages which have elapsed since the first
creature, the progenitor of innumerable extinct and living descendants, was created."
"When I view all beings not as special creations, but as the lineal descendants of
some few beings which lived long before the first bed of the Silurian system was
deposited, they seem to me to become ennobled."
</blockquote>
<p>
The famous closing sentence describes the "grandeur in this view of life, with its
several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one." The
phrase "one form" here seems to hark back to the phrase "some few beings"; in any
case, the choice of words is remarkable for its consistency with recent ideas about
there having been a single ancestral "genetic pool".
</p>
</div>
<h3 class="toggler atStart">
Evidence of universal common descent
</h3>
<div class="element atStart">
<h4>
Common biochemistry and genetic code
</h4>
<p>
All known forms of life are based on the same fundamental biochemical organisation:
genetic information encoded in DNA, transcribed into RNA, through the effect of
protein- and RNA-enzymes, then translated into proteins by (highly similar)
ribosomes, with ATP, NADH and others as energy currencies, etc. Furthermore, the
genetic code (the "translation table" according to which DNA information is
translated into proteins) is nearly identical for all known lifeforms, from bacteria
to humans, with minor local differences. The universality of this code is generally
regarded by biologists as definitive evidence in favor of the theory of universal
common descent. Analysis of the small differences in the genetic code has also
provided support for universal common descent.[2]
</p>
<h4>
Irrelevant differences
</h4>
<p>
Differences which have no relevance to evolution and therefore cannot be explained by
convergence, tend to be very compelling support for the universal common descent
theory.
</p>
<p>
Such evidence has come from two domains: amino acid sequences and DNA sequences.
Proteins with the same 3-d structure need not have identical amino acid sequences;
any irrelevant similarity between the sequences is evidence for common descent. In
certain cases, there are several codons (DNA triplets) that code for the same amino
acid. Thus, if two species use the same codon at the same place to specify an amino
acid that can be represented by more than one codon, that is evidence for recency of
a common ancestor.
</p><img src=
"http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/70/Phylogenetic_tree.svg/340px-Phylogenetic_tree.svg.png"
class="float-right" />
<p>
The universality of many aspects of cellular life is often pointed to as supportive
evidence to the more compelling evidence listed above. These similarities include the
energy carrier ATP, and the fact that all amino acids found in proteins are
left-handed. It is possible that these similarities resulted because of the laws of
physics and chemistry, rather than universal common descent and therefore resulted in
convergent evolution.
</p>
<h4>
Phylogenetic trees
</h4>
<p>
Another important piece of evidence is that it is possible to construct detailed
phylogenetic trees mapping out the proposed divisions and common ancestors of
species, and no matter what method is used, morphological (based on appearance,
embryology, etc) or molecular (based on mutation rates and relative similarities of
important, conserved genes), still get extremely similar results. If there were no
common ancestor, these different methods should give wildly different results, thus
the phylogenetic tree is strong evidence of common descent.
</p>
<div style="clear:both"></div>
</div>
<h3 class="toggler atStart">
Examples of common descent
</h3>
<div class="element atStart">
<h4>
Artificial selection
</h4>
<p>
Artificial selection offers remarkable examples of the amount of diversity that can
exist between individuals sharing a late common ancestor. To perform artificial
selection, one begins with a particular species (following examples include wolves
and wild cabbage) and then, at every generation, only allow certain individuals to
reproduce, based on the degree to which they exhibit certain desirable
characteristics. In time, it is expected that these characteristics become
increasingly well-developed in successive generations. Many examples of artificial
selection, like the ones below, occurred without the guidance of modern scientific
insight.
</p>
<h4>
Dog breeding
</h4><img src=
"http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/7e/IMG013biglittledogFX_wb.jpg/180px-IMG013biglittledogFX_wb.jpg"
class="float-right" />
<p>
An obvious example of the power of artificial selection is the diversity found in
various breed in domesticated dogs. The various breeds of dogs all share common
ancestry (being all ultimately descended from wolves) but were domesticated by humans
and then selectively bred in order to enhance various features such as coat color and
length or body size. To see the wide range of difference between the many breeds of
dogs compare the Chihuahua, Great Dane, Basset Hound, Pug, and Poodle. Also compare
this enormous diversity with the relative uniformity of wild wolves.
</p>
</div>
</div>
Then, we style it properly with CSS
CODE
.toggler {
color: #222;
margin: 0;
padding: 2px 5px;
background: #eee;
border-bottom: 1px solid #ddd;
border-right: 1px solid #ddd;
border-top: 1px solid #f5f5f5;
border-left: 1px solid #f5f5f5;
font-size: 11px;
font-weight: normal;
font-family: 'Andale Mono', sans-serif;
}
.element {
}
.element p {
margin: 0;
padding: 4px;
}
.float-right {
padding:10px 20px;
float:right;
}
blockquote {
text-style:italic;
padding:5px 0 5px 30px;
}
Just to give you an idea of how it looks like without the accordion effect:
With the accordion effect, everything stacks up nicely, thus saving viewport space and at the same time produces aesthetics value:
Now that we already have the HTML and CSS, all we need to do is just add a few lines of javascript. With Mootools, this has never really been easier:
CODE
var accordion = new Accordion('h3.atStart', 'div.atStart', {
opacity: false,
onActive: function(toggler, element){
toggler.setStyle('color', '#ff3300');
},
onBackground: function(toggler, element){
toggler.setStyle('color', '#222');
}
}, $('accordion'));
var newTog = new Element('h3', {'class': 'toggler'}).setHTML('Common descent');
var newEl = new Element('div', {'class': 'element'}).setHTML('<p>codercode codercode sample</p>');
accordion.addSection(newTog, newEl, 0);
opacity: false,
onActive: function(toggler, element){
toggler.setStyle('color', '#ff3300');
},
onBackground: function(toggler, element){
toggler.setStyle('color', '#222');
}
}, $('accordion'));
var newTog = new Element('h3', {'class': 'toggler'}).setHTML('Common descent');
var newEl = new Element('div', {'class': 'element'}).setHTML('<p>codercode codercode sample</p>');
accordion.addSection(newTog, newEl, 0);
That is all it takes to create a nice accordion effect for your divs! Hope y'all enjoy this tutorial
