At the first class seats in those planes, they have phones in the back of the seats, those are especially made for calling from an airplane and should work imho.

Reply

The reason why the video didn't comment on what happened to the people after they left the plane in Cleveland, is because they simply don't know. In my opinion, there were either one of two things that happened -- they were met with guns or money...

Reply

Honestly, I don't think Bush has the power to pull off the entire 9/11 thing himself and then blame it on terrorism. Also, there are a lot of things I find fishy:

1) If it would've been Bush that planned 9-11, he would be taking a huge risk as he had to organise an extreme amount of people willing to kill thousands of their own civilians, with a lot of research being done to make sure it looked like an attack etc.. and all this for oil? Oil is important, but he could've just made some false reports on mass nuclear weapons in Iraq, would've been a lot easier.

2) If he wanted it to look like the towers were attacked by high-jacked planes, why use bombs within the WTC and why are they using evidence that it's a conspiracy with pictures of the building smoking before the plane hit and fireman telling about a large bang afterwards. Basically, the claim is that the Government: Set off a bomb before the plane hit, replaced a plane with a fake 1, hitting the WTC, set off an explosion within the basement and then just before the building collapesed, set off a bomb on the high level floors. Wouldn't it be easier to just sent in the remote controlled plane with a lot of explosives, a normal reasoning person would be very frightened that someone discovered his plot and would never create a second explosion after the plane.

3) Why blame it on Osama Bin Laden, if the plan is to attack Iraq?

4) When U.S.A. invaded Iraq, why did they blame in on the weapons of mass destruction, that way, what was the 9-11 thing good for?

5) U.S.A. attacked Afghanistan after the 9-11 event, there's no oil there.

But, on the other hand, there are 2 things I don't trust.

1) The pentagon; the building with the highest security in the world, struck this easily with a passenger plane.. I think the Netherlands army should be able the United States then.. heck, Cuba could win a war. Also, the photo's there do testify that it was absolutely not a boeing.

2) The war against Iraq; it was not about weapons of mass destruction. The Dutch government stated the 3 days before the Iraq invasion that Iraq would have 10.000 litre's of Anthrax. This was based on a weapon report that was made public later. It stated that it could not be said for certain that the 8,500 litre (someone already exaderating on the 10k? ) Iraq had claimed to have produced, had been destroyed in 1991. However, liquid anthrax has a lifespan of 3-5 years, after that it starts to break down and after 6 years, you can be quite certain it's completely harmless... wich would've been in 1997.

So my point of view, the WTC, true as Bush said, the Pentagon, rather fishy, the war against Iraq, at least not because of weapons of mass destruction.

Reply

I have a hard time believing thes video's as well, especially the wikipedia entry, COME ON!! everyone knows wikipedia is unreliable it's not even funny. Also those explosions that were mentioned to be bombs in the third clip, is a bit off as well. Most of those mini explosions were close to when the building was collapsing so it is obvious that it was the buildings material blowing out from the collapse.

I will admit the cellphone thing is a bit fishy due to the fact its very hard to pick up a signal beyond a cell phone tower, I tried it once , I never got a signal whatsoever. So what happen to the passengers that landed in cleveland? Did they have a execution squad waiting for them to silence them? Thats funny he didn't mention anything about the reasons why they landed there and taken somewhere else.

I will admit bush iand everyone who worked for him are lying somewhere. Also I found it interested that they mention 9 of those hijackers are still alive, I don't see any video's about them being interviewed that they were accused of being a terrorists.

Put it like this the peace people have been striving for will never happen, regardless if this was plan or not, hundreds of thousands of people died across the world over this event and the fact that the people that deal with oil are getting richer. That why I can't wait till I am dead buried then I don't have to worry about this stuff ever again.

All we know is that thanks to people with all these conspiracy theories and corrupted officials, we will never find the truth about what really happen unless someone invents a time machine and goes back and prevents this from ever happening. Personally I don't care what really happen it won't change the fact that it is to late to do anything about it, Bush is leaving the white house next year most everyone who worked with him before and after have either been fired or left. I am going to live out my life thinking about it because then I will be doing what theis whole event is about and that is fear. Yeah one day I might have to explain to my own kids why the World is messed up as it is, but that will happen when it comes to it. So that my two cents and will be somewhat the last time I talk about this.

Reply

okay. 911 was both aviodable and non-aviodable.

Bush apparently knew about it all along, but didn't stop it because he wanted a reason to go over to the Middle-East for the oil ( Bush only sees money signs ($$$) not the lives that it cost.) and has killed thousands of people so that teh world can watch oil jump to astonishing rates.
It was non-aviodable, because ti was going to happen sooner or later anywayas, when an oil-loving person becomes president and wants to make $$$, he will do whatever it takes, no matter what teh cost.

Now, i support the "War on TERRORISM" but once you go after the oil and fake "nuclear bombs" then it is tiem to get oout.

Reply