|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 59 Joined: 26-December 07 From: India , Mumbai Member No.: 55,296 |
Post
#1
Mar 9 2008, 09:09 PM
QUOTE A New Zealand security researcher has published a software tool allowing attackers to quickly gain access to Windows systems via a Firewire port.
The tool, which can only be used by attackers with physical access to a system, comes shortly after the publication of research on gaining access to encrypted hard drives via physical access to memory. Researcher Adam Boileau, a consultant with Immunity, originally demonstrated the access tool at a security conference in 2006, but decided not to release the code any further at the time. Two years later, however, nothing has been done toward fixing the problem, so he decided to go public. "Yes, this means you can completely own any box whose Firewire port you can plug into in seconds," said Boileau in a recent blog entry. An attacker must connect to the machine with a Linux system and a Firewire cable to run the tool. The tool, called Winlockpwn, allows users to bypass Windows authorization, was originally demonstrated at Ruxcon in 2006 at a talk called "Hit By A Bus: Physical Access Attacks With Firewire". At the time, Boileau also demonstrated some of the malicious uses of the tool, but said he wouldn't be releasing the code for those attacks. The attack takes advantage of the fact that Firewire can directly read and write to a system's memory, adding extra speed to data transfer. According to Boileau, because this capability is built into Firewire, Microsoft doesn't consider the problem a standard bug. On the other hand, Boileau said he feels PC users need to be more aware of the fact that their systems can be unlocked via Firewire. "Yes, it's a feature, not a bug," Boileau stated. "Microsoft knows this. The OHCI-1394 spec knows this. People with Firewire ports generally don't." Microsoft was not immediately available for comment. In the past the company has downplayed security problems that require physical access. Firewire has become common on Windows systems in the past few years, and is especially prevalent on laptops. Researcher Maximillian Dornseif demonstrated a similar exploit on Linux and Mac OS X systems at the CanSec conference in 2005, connecting to those systems via a malicious iPod and Firewire. According to security researchers, the problem can be remedied by disabling Firewire when not in use. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#2
Mar 9 2008, 10:02 PM
Wow! Thanks for posting this. I am not sure that this is the correct place to post it though unless it deals with PHP. I am a Windows/Linux user and need to watch out for this. I am not sure though that my computer has a Firewire port though. This is huge and dangerous.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#3
Mar 9 2008, 10:45 PM
Holy crap. Nice post, very intresting to see yet another program whereby hackers can hack you. Thanks for the heads up.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 121 Joined: 5-March 08 Member No.: 58,905 |
Post
#4
Mar 9 2008, 11:05 PM
My question is how does one find out if they have a Firewire port and how do I disable it if I do? I mean, I don't want my laptop hacked...especially since I'm on vista....
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,213 Joined: 25-September 05 From: Los Angeles, California Member No.: 12,251 myCENT:32.88 |
Post
#5
Mar 10 2008, 05:50 AM
QUOTE(Inhuman @ Mar 9 2008, 03:05 PM) [snapback]378311[/snapback] My question is how does one find out if they have a Firewire port and how do I disable it if I do? I mean, I don't want my laptop hacked...especially since I'm on vista.... Well if your laptop had it it would have either the firewire symbol: ![]() or this i1394 symbol next to it: ![]() I don't know what you could do about disabling it, but I'm pretty sure that you would notice if somebody plugged a cable into your port of your laptop. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 121 Joined: 5-March 08 Member No.: 58,905 |
Post
#6
Mar 10 2008, 07:56 AM
Haha, yea probably. But I don't see those symbols anywhere, so I think I'm good for meow. Thanks for the info. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#7
Mar 10 2008, 08:11 AM
Hey flamex do you have the original source for this? The odds that you will have access to a machine with windows and firewire port is very slim. Most people wont leave their machines unattended. I wouldn't too worried unless your computer is a shared one where other people can jump on at anytime. Thanks for sharing the article by the way it was a good read. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 59 Joined: 26-December 07 From: India , Mumbai Member No.: 55,296 |
Post
#8
Mar 11 2008, 08:32 PM
QUOTE(sonesay @ Mar 10 2008, 01:41 PM) [snapback]378373[/snapback] Hey flamex do you have the original source for this? The odds that you will have access to a machine with windows and firewire port is very slim. Most people wont leave their machines unattended. I wouldn't too worried unless your computer is a shared one where other people can jump on at anytime. Thanks for sharing the article by the way it was a good read. hey buddy ... watever was ther in the article i have posted it .. that was it ... > in the article its written tht the hacker himself cant share a few things .. Well i read this in the PC WOrld magazine .. > if u want i ll pm u the link .. > |
![]() Group: Members
Posts: 9 Joined: 16-March 08 Member No.: 59,413 |
|
![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 39 Joined: 26-May 08 Member No.: 62,700 |
Post
#10
May 26 2008, 03:05 PM
Wow! Pretty scary... if you use windows ] That's a huge vulnerabilty but I'm wondering how many laptops have a firewire port (not-apple laptops of course |
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
4 | bluedragon | 426 | 27th June 2008 - 01:38 PM Last post by: rvalkass |
||
![]() |
5 | Evil man | 1,848 | 23rd June 2007 - 06:34 PM Last post by: rize619 |
||
![]() |
7 | jailbox | 546 | 6th September 2004 - 11:53 AM Last post by: synderoxide |
||
![]() |
2 | dontmaimyourself | 535 | 2nd August 2004 - 08:55 AM Last post by: Spectre |
||
![]() |
16 | pr3dr49 | 1,022 | 9th August 2004 - 06:39 PM Last post by: popac |
||
![]() |
11 | stingray001 | 989 | 1st August 2006 - 04:46 PM Last post by: gaggu121 |
||
![]() |
10 | zhangzy | 1,009 | 24th September 2004 - 01:58 PM Last post by: goranche |
||
![]() |
5 | stevey | 362 | 20th August 2004 - 06:14 PM Last post by: Spectre |
||
![]() |
14 | Thunder | 962 | 24th September 2004 - 01:25 AM Last post by: akz |
||
![]() |
17 | dundun2007 | 1,372 | 20th October 2004 - 01:50 PM Last post by: jamesdm |
||
![]() |
8 | tonyused | 528 | 23rd June 2006 - 04:38 PM Last post by: innocent-devil |
||
![]() |
2 | stevey | 425 | 24th September 2004 - 12:30 AM Last post by: akz |
||
![]() |
11 | Zenchi | 1,627 | 14th October 2004 - 12:04 PM Last post by: NTNguyen |
||
![]() |
19 | Seņor Maniac | 917 | 26th September 2004 - 02:04 PM Last post by: Seņor Maniac |
||
![]() |
1 | farh1n | 4,160 | 11th August 2007 - 02:21 PM |