|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Oct 7 2005, 03:18 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 27-September 05 Member No.: 12,296 |
What processor do you like to use?
These processor has their own functions in every uses which processor do you prefer to use. Even in work or just in gamin? This post has been edited by BuffaloHELP: Oct 25 2005, 12:18 AM |
|
|
|
Oct 7 2005, 06:32 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 7-October 05 Member No.: 12,627 |
If I am gaming, I like AMD. If I'm going to do everyday work, then I'd choose Intel. Intelis more compatable with more programs, but AMD works games better.
|
|
|
|
Oct 7 2005, 10:38 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 146 Joined: 6-October 05 Member No.: 12,601 |
IBM Power PC IS the Best processors. Then I think AMD is on the second place, intel is so slow.
http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/2002/07...cw_macvspc2.htm http://www.apple.com/powermac/performance/ |
|
|
|
Oct 9 2005, 02:28 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 68 Joined: 3-August 04 From: California Member No.: 608 |
AMD beats intel and powerpc all the way. Much more stable and fast. Theres nothing else I can say but try it yourself.
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2005, 02:38 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 250 Joined: 4-October 05 Member No.: 12,524 |
Amd is better because my notebook has it
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2005, 02:43 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
.::UniCorN::. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 973 Joined: 19-September 04 From: Dalian CHN Member No.: 1,192 |
interesting,after my voting the result is deuce(both are 42.6%).although its huge amounts of transistors make huge quantity of heat...from the market foreground,intel will be the winner furthermore last to the real 64bit time(having to admit that AMD is powerful in CISC family indeed).
|
|
|
|
Oct 24 2005, 06:13 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Mankie ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 761 Joined: 22-July 05 From: New Delhi, India Member No.: 9,746 |
I have AMD Athlon 64 bit 3000+ and it is working for me and giving me the performance i want and that too at a lower rate. The only downside of this processor is that it is having less l2 cache and that is of only 512 kb...i would have been better if it was either 1 mb or 2 mb. I dont know how it is possible that processor of speed of 2.0 Ghz is able to compete with Intel's 3.0 Ghz and that is the reason why they call it 3000+..strange huh?
|
|
|
|
Oct 24 2005, 06:51 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Incest is a game the whole family can play. ![]() Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 1,205 Joined: 11-February 05 From: Heaven Member No.: 3,709 |
|
|
|
|
Oct 24 2005, 09:43 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Premium Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 199 Joined: 29-September 05 Member No.: 12,363 |
I am using Amd and I agree, I think its more stable with games than Intel. Intel I think its more for work and programms, not games. So I would preffer AMD if you like gaming. And Intel if you are spending most of you time with C and C++ or making websites or other things.
|
|
|
|