|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 35 Joined: 27-August 05 From: NZ Member No.: 11,181 |
Post
#1
Aug 27 2005, 05:50 AM
Here is the surrent list of things that I THINK a good website shouldn't have! 1. An enormous amount of animated .gifs OK, who in the "normal" world likes to visit a site full of these flashing animations/banners/buttons/images??? (But I do understand that some sites have to endure these due to their host) I extremely don't like arriving at a website that takes 10 years to load and in the end all I see is a massive clutter of blinking images! In particular, to those animations that only contain one or two frames and are on loop. When I see those, I thank the people at Microsoft(and other browsers) for creating the "STOP" button, that way it will freeze the animations so they don't continue to "blink me to death". In conclusion I suggest to not have ANY of those animated gif's on your website, but if it really IS that tempting to have it on your site, than please only use 1 or 2 because, honestly, they are very annoying. You shouldn't have animated .gifs because of these reasons: >>they take a lot of space > on your server and on your bandwith (especially if your site has a lot of visitors. >>they take a long time to load > tough on your visitors who have to wait for each and every image to load and by the time it's finished loading, your visitor would of been long GONE!! It's also tough on your bandwith! >>they are annoying > YES THEY ARE! Very annoying and if people look at it for a while they may even suffer epileptic seizures!! (if the case is serious) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 35 Joined: 27-August 05 From: NZ Member No.: 11,181 |
Post
#2
Aug 27 2005, 06:52 AM
2. CSS coded scrollbars where all the values of the scrollbar are in the same colour People with Firefox, should just ignore this because the browser shows the default scrollbar anyway. But with people whom use Internet explorer and are able to see the coloured scrollbar, keep reading if you like. Let me explain:webdesigners whom are capable of coding CSS, usually like to code the scrollbar colors so that it fits in with their site or with their site layout. But some people for some strange reason like to change the colours of their scrollbar so that all the values (track color, darkshadow color) are in the same colour. So when users visit their page they will have a see a "lovely" scrollbar where you cannot see the difference between the arrows, the face of the scrollbar and or the track colour. Thats fantastic (NOT)! Especially to those websites that have very long pages which require excessive scrolling. Most people click and drag the scrollbar on the screen to scroll down the page but unfortunately when they encounter a "one color scrollbar" (as I call it) they will just have to guess where the face of the scrollbar is and drag. Also, does anyone know what it feels like to scroll down a page to read the content but then when you want to scroll down a little further by pressing the scrollbar again, it suddenly drags you to another part of the page? This usually occurs when you haven't been able to exactly hit on the face of the scrollbar and continue to drag, instead you had clicked on the track of the bar(short for scrollbar, I am so tired of having to write that word), thus has taken you to another part of the page from where you clicked. I KNOW IT IS VERY COMPLICATING, BUT BEAR WITH ME. That is a problem that I find is quite annoying, because then I have the hard task of finding the face of the bar which is close to impossible because the colours of the bar are all the same! And then try scrolling again! In conclusion >>when selecting colours for your scrollbar>remember to diversify in your colours, meaning to use dfferent colours, it's easier for you and it's even more easier for your visitors to navigate--especially if you have very long pages or even worse, Inline frames. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 638 Joined: 25-April 05 Member No.: 6,138 |
Post
#3
Aug 27 2005, 06:59 AM
Yeah, I hate those kind of sites too... I think overenthusiastic kids made those sites, they don't know better than to keep it simple and make it heaven for their visitors. I was like that once before, but thankfully, I realized that I was also having trouble with my site. (It also crashed my computer) But I have a classmate who thinks she's such a computer genius. She wanted to be a programmer thinking that she's gonna be good, since she's good at math. Wha? I may be 14 but I've programmed every now and then. (VBasic, lame, I know... I've seen her site. DiS iz hOw sHe "tAlKs" tO hEr vIsItoRs. She also has a few special characters now and then. Oh, and she "text" talks with that kind of character arrangement in Filipino, would you believe it!? It's such a hassle. I viewed it with Firefox, and the frames went berserk. It seems that she didn't think there were other browsers out there. She should've said, Best viewed in IE, but no! Oh, and she also has tons of "adopt a---" animated gifs. It's so annoying! I could hardly read her light blue on dark blue text! Ooh, just thinking about how she boasts about her site makes me so angry... I never boast about my site in class, I hardly tell my friends! She thinks she's so elite! Tch. *icemarle tries to cool down* (Yeah, I guess I really turned it into a venting topic hehehe |
![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 35 Joined: 27-August 05 From: NZ Member No.: 11,181 |
Post
#4
Aug 27 2005, 07:15 AM
Hi Icemarie, yup I totally agree, I really don't like those people whom boast a lot about their site when really their site's nothing special! I mean, I'm not saying I'm an expert at webdesigning or anything but I know that a site that types in sTiCkY cApS is nothing unique. A good website, doesn't require anyone to boast about it, people would just know that it's a good website. Anway, Yeah, I agree, my first post doesn't even sound like venting, it sounds more like, me trying to tell people what not to add to their site than venting about what I hate! Don't worry I'll try to start venting, once I see a site that really pisses me off, and trust me, there are so much sites out there that you know you'd love to burn! Oh, do you like anime/manga as well? I do too! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 85 Joined: 27-August 05 From: QLD, Aus. G'day! Member No.: 11,186 |
Post
#5
Aug 27 2005, 09:57 AM
Font tags. And blinky/scrolly things. And table based layouts. And, the big one.... Comic. Sans. Prefix the following with : Micro. Soft. In true slashdot style : "There's no emoticon for what I'm feeling!!oneone!" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 638 Joined: 25-April 05 Member No.: 6,138 |
Post
#6
Aug 27 2005, 10:11 AM
I'm icemarle by the way... ICEMARLE. A lot of people think I'm icemarie, QUOTE Oh, do you like anime/manga as well? I do too! Yeah! I especially like comedy and shoujo (girl manga). I also study Japanese because I wanted to read my games and talk with my 3 Japanese cousins. (They don't speak English or my language) [center][note=cmatcmextra]Edited as per request.[/note][/center] This post has been edited by cmatcmextra: Aug 27 2005, 11:06 AM |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 436 Joined: 21-January 05 From: Koronadal City, Philippines Member No.: 3,358 |
Post
#7
Aug 27 2005, 12:31 PM
Oooh I'm glad I don't have any blinking gifs in my site and a colored scrollbar... whew! but I use an inline frame for my shoutbox. I agree with what you guys said about animated gifs being annoying when they're all you see in a website. It's distracting and it takes the focus from the whole site content and it makes the designer seem amateur and the website tacky. sorry! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 821 Joined: 6-March 05 Member No.: 4,202 |
Post
#8
Aug 27 2005, 12:51 PM
I agree with all of the above. Animated gifs are so annoying... of course I have used in the past... the first time I decided to make a website I found it a good idea to give movement by using those horrible sequences of images. Oh, that typical gif of a mail box... Now I´m rehabilited |
![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 35 Joined: 27-August 05 From: NZ Member No.: 11,181 |
Post
#9
Aug 27 2005, 02:22 PM
Corrections/replies: Icemarle- I got your name wrong.. Leiaah-don't be afraid to speak your mind, this is venting!! Littleweseth-hehe, funny username! and yep, I find the Comic sans font really boring and sorta lumpy too (if you get what I mean) Sprnknwn-Good for you!! I think I used the animated mailbox once too. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> A short post this time. 3. Large Images A good website should be a website where the site is quick in loading. But if you have large images, you can say bye to the impatient visitors at your site. Also a good website should have a layout that is designed by the site owner, using graphics and coding all by the owner. When I see a very large image on a site, I try to look away and I also try to stop the temptation of clicking the [X] in the top right corner. The first idea I get is: this site owner cannot design or it could be he/she is so lazy. I think this because any webdesigner should of heard of the "slice" tool. (a tool used to cut an image into smaller sizes, to improve loading time and space). Slicing your image is not that difficult at all, just open up the slicing program and cut away (But remember, cut the image into reasonable sizes and by that I don't mean cutting it to 3-4 pixels per slice). Thus, your images are smaller and are quicker to download. I really dislike websites with enormous images for their layouts, it takes so long to load, I sometimes feel sorry for those webusers that have slow internet connections, they have to wait so long for the image to load. In conclusion >>if you have large images in your site layout, use the slicing tool with adobe Photoshop, Jasc paint shop pro or download a free slicer from coffecup software. Slicing the image decreases the loading time and as a result visitors might decide to stay at your site for longer to check out what it's got to offer. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------> Kind of short.... I guess, with 1769 characters. Thank You to everyone reading! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 62 Joined: 18-August 05 Member No.: 10,871 |
Post
#10
Aug 27 2005, 10:22 PM
I dont know what Comic Sans are, but I totally agree with your thoughts on the little animations, I hate those things. Or even on peoples myspace's. Everyone has some music video, or even videos, that take forever to load and slow you down, some peoples Myspace has so much stuff on there like animated gifts, adpot a pet, custom scroll bars, videos etc, that my computer will lock up. On websites its just as annoying. I think having a nice simple layout, with good content is ideal. Like I prefer google's look over yahoo's. Or aj.com is simple and kind to the eyes as well. Anyhow thats just my opinion. Peace Jason. |
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
9 | noxit | 963 | 21st June 2004 - 08:16 PM Last post by: wassie |
||
![]() |
22 | -iancovenant- | 1,154 | 9th December 2008 - 06:40 PM Last post by: Echo_of_thunder |
||
![]() |
21 | Dagoth Nereviar | 1,458 | 11th November 2008 - 03:27 AM Last post by: Ruben |
||
![]() |
6 | rpgsearcherz | 328 | 8th December 2008 - 12:23 PM Last post by: minimcmonkey |
||
![]() |
3 | Thunder | 597 | 28th July 2004 - 02:35 AM Last post by: killer |
||
![]() |
12 | EricDrinkard | 1,762 | 6th August 2004 - 09:29 PM Last post by: Vacant |
||
![]() |
0 | andyy15 | 574 | 29th July 2004 - 03:59 PM Last post by: andyy15 |
||
![]() |
1 | Jarek_Gd | 243 | 24th February 2008 - 12:49 PM Last post by: rvalkass |
||
![]() |
21 | PnOyKiO | 2,292 | 12th September 2004 - 11:04 AM Last post by: dreek |
||
![]() |
15 | Dehornos | 1,611 | 2nd January 2009 - 09:04 AM Last post by: contactskn |
||
![]() |