Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register)



 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Us Warplanes Get "ray Guns", AESA + HPM = EMP beam.
Goosestaf
post Jul 29 2005, 04:40 PM
Post #1


Privileged Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 503
Joined: 22-September 04
From: Worcester/Milton Keynes (UK)
Member No.: 1,226



Aircraft like the F-15, F-22, F-35, and the E-10MC2A with AESA (Active Electronically Scanned Array) radars will be able to fry the circuitry in enemy aircraft and missiles. Basically these radars can be used as HPMs (High-Powered-Microwaves) which cause an EMP affect on electronics they target.

The new air force E-10 aircraft will be able to "zap" cruise missiles up to 180km away!
F-22s and F-35s with smaller radars will be less effective, but have the capability nonetheless. More importantly, range depends on the targets EM shielding and the power needed to hurt it.
(newslink)

A ground based version of this system, called Vigilant Eagle will be able to protect US airports from shoulder-fired missiles while costing much less than outfitting each individual airliner with an ECM system. (Vigilant Eagle link)

just thought some might be interested
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dontmaimyourself
post Jul 29 2005, 05:21 PM
Post #2


Lord of the last day
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 527
Joined: 30-July 04
From: England
Member No.: 305



Cool, sounds like a pretty efficient anti-missile system, would be pretty handy to fire it at an enemy aircraft too (although missiles work to, not against this though). The 'Vigilant Eagle' I would expect to be more useful, lets face it very few of us own an F-15, but quite a few of us would rether not be shot down whilst in a commercial airliner, hopefully these systems will have become common place in airports.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
skynet
post Jul 30 2005, 02:17 AM
Post #3


Advanced Member
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 148
Joined: 24-July 05
Member No.: 9,784



Nice, but I'm wondering how much electrical power to establish HPM to 180 km away wink.gif
This is good weapon for fight against any crime, but as long terrorist doesn't have the technology we will save. laugh.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brainless
post Jul 30 2005, 04:21 PM
Post #4


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 343
Joined: 16-April 05
From: Wardenburg/Northern Germany
Member No.: 5,763



finally a development which I don't dislike for being de facto useless smile.gif though it might be interesting to see what a person with destructive ideas could do to a plane when he or she somehow receives control over one of these systems... ;p
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint_Michael
post Jul 30 2005, 06:03 PM
Post #5


$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3
*********************

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 6,315
Joined: 21-September 04
From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\
Member No.: 1,218
T17 GFX Crew



welcome to the age of nuclear accelarators people thats the only to do by putting a small nuke reactor in the planes to use the energy to power it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FLaKes
post Jul 30 2005, 06:21 PM
Post #6


Trap Grand Marshal Member
***********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,134
Joined: 19-May 05
From: Mexico
Member No.: 7,234



Cool, that is some awesome modern technology. I wonder when there will be a next war for it to be used. Although I know its going to be really efective in defense
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dynomite
post Aug 1 2005, 10:52 PM
Post #7


Member [Level 1]
****

Group: Members
Posts: 54
Joined: 31-July 05
Member No.: 10,089



That sounds pretty cool! When I first saw this topic title I thought you where talking about something from Star Wars, but that is way cooler. it's useful too, it will help save lives and stuff...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
brainless
post Aug 2 2005, 07:02 AM
Post #8


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 343
Joined: 16-April 05
From: Wardenburg/Northern Germany
Member No.: 5,763



yeah, and radar-guided rays are way less likely to miss the target and it's way more likely that they actually leave the ground *cough* didn't the Pentagon declare the last Star Wars-test launch as successful even though the counter-missile didn't leave the launch platform? ;D
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint_Michael
post Aug 4 2005, 04:01 AM
Post #9


$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3
*********************

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 6,315
Joined: 21-September 04
From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\
Member No.: 1,218
T17 GFX Crew



well heres the thing about lasers they go through objects thats means anything in that lasers path is going to get cook.