|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Mar 16 2006, 02:17 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 135 Joined: 1-December 05 From: Minnesoooota Member No.: 15,201 |
Harry Potter Spoilers
Read spoiler at your own risk Alright now here is MY theory on the whole "Snape is innocent, no shut up, he's guilty" thing: I was reading a transcript of an interview that J.K. Rowling gave to some newspaper or magazine, I'm not sure which, but it was about the guy asking her if she liked Harry Potter : Prisoner of Azkaban, the movie. According to Rowling, she got "goosebumps" after watching it because it revealed a major spoiler for later in the series (i.e., book seven). Today, I was watching Prisoner of Azkaban and I figured out that part. Remember near the end when Lupin is transforming into a werewolf, and he is about to attack Ron, Harry, and Hermione? Well, at this point the book, Snape was still unconscious from the disarming spell that Harry had used against him in the Shrieking Shack. However, at this point in the movie, when Lupin is about to pounce on the Trio, Snape suddenly runs in front of them and blocks them from Lupin. Why would Snape do this? Why would he show any compassion for Harry Potter or his friends in the face of terrible danger? The answer? Because he was under orders from Dumbledore to do so. He could've easily let Lupin devour them and run off for himself, but he didn't. Arguments: But what if he was just saving Harry so that Voldemort could use him in his revival at the end of Goblet of Fire? Answer: Because even if Snape was on the Death Eaters' side, he would not have known about the plan. Voldemort started planning his revival at the beginning of Goblet of Fire, and the only person he told was Peter Pettigrew (aka wormtail). I might be wrong, but I'd like to hear your opinion on my theory! P.S. This also supports another theory / spoiler that I read on the Trap17 Forum, the theory of Snape being in love with Lily Potter and protecting Harry Potter as owing her a favor. This post has been edited by OpaQue: Sep 1 2007, 06:50 PM |
|
|
|
Mar 16 2006, 11:52 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Hidden Secrets can't be told threw just words. One must feel what the other feels to truely understand... ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,523 Joined: 8-January 06 From: Sacramento California Member No.: 16,756 |
i have had talks with friends of mine, and before Prisioner Of Azkaban came out
![]() that picture had come out as one of the first, and one of the questions that came up in our conversations was your theory above... i would agree with the fact that he had orders from dumbledore to protect harry at practicly any cost...and this theory can also lead to the thing believeing that dumbledore is not dead because he snape had orders from dumbledore to do it, but some believe that he was not actually killed...there is a post around here somewhere that explaints theory but there is the website http://www.dumbledoreisnotdead.com/ check it out, but then again maybe you have seen it before...but i cannot wait for the 7th book to come out and reveal what really happened in the ending :-D.... |
|
|
|
Mar 17 2006, 02:25 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 20 Joined: 28-January 06 Member No.: 17,811 |
That is a good theory / spoiler. I think Snape is good, and I can't wait to see how the Harry Potter series ends. Oh jeez, we're gonna have to wait until next year to read the seventh HP book...its seems like its taking forever.
|
|
|
|
Mar 17 2006, 06:27 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member [Level 2] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 88 Joined: 9-March 06 Member No.: 19,769 |
How many Harry Potter books were announced?
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 12:48 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 20 Joined: 28-January 06 Member No.: 17,811 |
Peo: J.K. Rowling said she'd only write 7 Harry Potter books, but she might write a fictional biography of Albus Dumbledore when the seventh book is over
|
|
|
|
Mar 28 2006, 01:15 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 23 Joined: 6-March 06 Member No.: 19,576 |
Extremely good find. I probably wouldn't read Dumbledore's biography XD Although I read the HP books. Snape doesn't like Harry, and it definately shows. Suprisingly, I have nothing to say against that theory. Maybe Snape is doing more than protecting Harry. =o
|
|
|
|
Apr 1 2006, 09:13 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 21,149 |
Alright now here is MY theory on the whole "Snape is innocent, no shut up, he's guilty" thing: I was reading a transcript of an interview that J.K. Rowling gave to some newspaper or magazine, I'm not sure which, but it was about the guy asking her if she liked Prisoner of Azkaban, the movie. According to Rowling, she got "goosebumps" after watching it because it revealed a major spoiler for later in the series (i.e., book seven). Today, I was watching Prisoner of Azkaban and I figured out that part. Remember near the end when Lupin is transforming into a werewolf, and he is about to attack Ron, Harry, and Hermione? Well, at this point the book, Snape was still unconscious from the disarming spell that Harry had used against him in the Shrieking Shack. However, at this point in the movie, when Lupin is about to pounce on the Trio, Snape suddenly runs in front of them and blocks them from Lupin. Why would Snape do this? Why would he show any compassion for Harry or his friends in the face of terrible danger? The answer? Because he was under orders from Dumbledore to do so. He could've easily let Lupin devour them and run off for himself, but he didn't. Arguements: But what if he was just saving Harry so that Voldemort could use him in his revival at the end of Goblet of Fire? Answer: Because even if Snape was on the Death Eaters' side, he would not have known about the plan. Voldemort started planning his revival at the beginning of Goblet of Fire, and the only person he told was Peter Pettigrew (aka wormtail). I might be wrong, but I'd like to hear your opinion on my theory! P.S. This also supports another theory that I read on the Trap17 Forum, the theory of Snape being in love with Lily Potter and protecting Harry as owing her a favor. I think you could very well be right. I also support the 'Snape loves Lily' argument. It makes perfect sense. I've said before, it's been made out too obvious that Snape is a bad guy, for him to actually be bad. He's like a pantomime villain... But each time they have suspected Snape of being up to no good, they have always been wrong. Snape is usually going out of his way to protect Harry... this may be to do with feeling 'endebted' to Harrys father, thought I doubt it, it may be more to do with him being Lily's son. As for Snape killing dumbledore... Theres the theory that Dumbledore never really died The theory he was already dying and Snape and Dumbledore had reached an agreement to kill him off that way (it would 'proove' snapes loyalty in the eyes of voldemort) The theory that dumbledore had ordered Snape to and he did it despite not wanting to (however, that theory seems to be wrong, as it has been stressed over and over to us you cannot use an unforgivable curse without sincerely and wholly wanting to relish in the consequences it would cause) Of course, we could all be looking way too much into this. It is still a childrens book And ultimately, in childrens book, the guy whos being made out to be a bit evil, is usually a bit evil Snape could have killed dumbledore, and dumbledore is properly dead Personally I can't wait to find out! Don't you think it would be MUCH more interesting if Rowling wrote books on Snapes life... I would quite like that We would get to know where he truely stood on certain matters And how cruel his childhood really was for ihm =( |
|
|
|
Apr 1 2006, 09:25 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 1-April 06 Member No.: 21,149 |
I think it would be amazing if Rowling wrote a book or two on Snapes life. I would love to find out about his childhood, miserable as it must have been.. To hear things from his point of view... to read Rowling making Harrys dad and Sirius into people we could dislike, simply by seeing things Snapes way. I'd love to read how Snape reaallly felt about making the unbreakable vow, and about his time working as a 'spy' for both voldemort and Dumbledore.. It would make a good read =) |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2006, 12:18 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 17-April 06 Member No.: 22,025 |
I think snape is innocent for other reasons here! read my theories!!! I have my own... 1 Is Malfoy really a death eater? it must be, although he might even be the one that betrays the dark lord because just as he could kill dumbledore he would regret other acts. But not likely though because malfoy's family runs a tradition in the dark arts! 2 Snape could be innocent!! yes! doesn't look like? well look at it this way! everything sape told dumpledore was never confirmed by anyone and he is a highly accomplish occlumens he could be telling the truth and as for killing dumbledore well he made the unbreakable vow didn't he? and the never really tried to harm harry even if he hated him... 3 harry's future if he leave's school we move to another world of possibilities as for the fact that nothing garantees that 7th is the last book! again this could be wrong and JKR decides to publish a book 100% of action and mistery and adventure which althoug very hard would be a grand final! even then there is the question of who will be his supporters? the DA |