IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



Tags
This content has not been tagged yet
2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Shoot A Pic, Focus Later

, new technology for digital cameras


realthor
no avatar
Super Member
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 202
Joined: 7-November 05
Member No.: 13,928



Post #1 post Nov 14 2005, 03:25 PM
Me again:)Searching the web for my science news thirst i've stumbled over some words about refocusing of blurred photos,method and technology developed at Stanford University.The primordial use would be in sports where each photograph ca't be re-photographed or surveillance systems.Of course even an non-profesional photographer could take advantage of this technology:).It's better described at this
adress: http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/200...s-sap110905.php
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
atomicnacho
no avatar
Premium Member
********
Group: Members
Posts: 176
Joined: 16-September 05
Member No.: 11,932
myCENT:ZERO



Post #2 post Nov 14 2005, 06:09 PM
That is a pretty sweet idea. It will certainly be a long time until it see the light of day in consumer digicams.

I'm sure all of us have missed that great photo because the autofocus took too long or screwed up and would love to not have to worry about focus anymore.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Cerebral Stasis
no avatar
Braindead by Default
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 5-November 05
From: United States of America
Member No.: 13,837



Post #3 post Nov 14 2005, 07:03 PM
It's a good idea, but I'm pretty sure that the sheet of 90,000 lenses will make the camera in question be far too expensive for the average consumer, and thus would only be affordable for large businesses/agencies in which security is essential (for example, large banks, government installations, government surveillance aircraft, etc.). If anything, it will probably have many more potential opportunities for misuse than anything else.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
realthor
no avatar
Super Member
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 202
Joined: 7-November 05
Member No.: 13,928



Post #4 post Nov 15 2005, 04:54 PM
Yup!quite right but in a few years...lots can change and expensive technology becomes more and more affordable so not too far in the future,considering the speed new technologies arrive compared with let's say 5 ears ago,this will be all day thing.And as far as i see it it is some invention,not just any improvement digital cameras get with every new product.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
believer
no avatar
Super Member
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 205
Joined: 3-September 05
Member No.: 11,447



Post #5 post Nov 16 2005, 07:09 AM

in essence, the article or the study simply says the adjustment will be made after the user have taken the picture which is by the use of a software. I do love photography but I would rather have a camera (of course in the future) that will give me right focus during the time of my shooting, soon I guess we will have this.

Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
quakesand
no avatar
Premium Member
********
Group: Members
Posts: 152
Joined: 25-October 06
Member No.: 32,191



Post #6 post Jan 13 2007, 04:03 AM
wow that could be really useful, take a picture and make it 3d-ish! lol
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
korin
no avatar
Newbie [Level 2]
**
Group: Members
Posts: 36
Joined: 12-January 07
Member No.: 37,048



Post #7 post Jan 13 2007, 05:28 PM
That would relieve so much tension around my parents' house, cause they always get pictures out of focus. lol
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
hybridsystem
no avatar
Newbie [Level 1]
*
Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 15-February 07
From: England
Member No.: 38,751



Post #8 post Feb 16 2007, 12:04 AM
Yeah,

This is another one of those great technologies that I would love to play with now and it's not available for years, if ever! This would certainly be useful for people like me, who has a girlfriend who seems incapable of taking a picture in focus. I have atleast five decent picture that I would love to have re-focused, it's espectially annonying when they are just a little bit out of focus and need to be corrected only slightly.

I know if would be a better (yet incredible more expensive) idea if this was built into cameras as it would always delivery a focussed picture, although it would be a lot better if there was (even if it was slightly less effective) a software equivalent, like I say I already have the pictures I want I just need to focus them!

It would be nice if this came about but to be honest it is one of those technologies I don't see surfacing for a while, I'd buy it atleast. That or I need a quicker auto-focus, or a girlfriend who is capable of using one!

Grey.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
FLaKes
no avatar
Trap Grand Marshal Member
***********
Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,140
Joined: 19-May 05
From: Mexico
Member No.: 7,234
myCENT:54.56



Post #9 post Feb 16 2007, 03:17 AM
I have never been bad at focusing but sometimes it looks good on the camera and when you see it on the pc you notice blur on your pictures. This is going to be a great piece of new technology, and I think that they will figure out a way to make this technology be affordable in a couple of years.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
hybridsystem
no avatar
Newbie [Level 1]
*
Group: Members
Posts: 19
Joined: 15-February 07
From: England
Member No.: 38,751



Post #10 post Feb 16 2007, 12:51 PM
Like I said, software will be easy and cheap, a couple of years no proble,

Although if it is hardware and built-into the camera then it will certainly be a lot longer than two years. Also, wouldn't it make the camera's a lot bigger?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No new   14 -nsguy- 1,229 16th March 2005 - 06:29 AM
Last post by: -scrtcrnr-
No New Posts   1 adriantc 604 24th May 2005 - 07:22 PM
Last post by: hellgate
No New Posts   1 Focus 315 12th June 2005 - 08:35 PM
Last post by: OpaQue
No New Posts   11 Microsoft 1,643 1st March 2006 - 07:59 PM
Last post by: minnyhaha
No New Posts   1 amir691 424 3rd July 2006 - 07:06 AM
Last post by: Dragonfly
No New Posts   1 Saint_Michael 317 26th April 2008 - 06:36 PM
Last post by: bluedragon
No New Posts   2 kvarnerexpress 745 3rd June 2008 - 09:55 AM
Last post by: FeedBacker
No New Posts   2 Zaeem 430 30th May 2006 - 10:33 PM
Last post by: Paul
No New Posts   13 barnes 1,561 26th May 2008 - 08:29 PM
Last post by: FeedBacker
No New Posts   7 Yratorm, LightMage 1,230 3rd March 2007 - 01:56 PM
Last post by: chaowucn
No new   23 pokethamage 1,210 28th January 2007 - 07:21 AM
Last post by: richierich1m
No New Posts   1 Dangerman_1973 310 7th September 2007 - 07:38 AM
Last post by: thugsmoke058
No New Posts   12 joeblogg 249 2nd November 2008 - 06:20 AM
Last post by: Jezstarr


 



RSS