|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Oct 23 2007, 07:15 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,564 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 ![]() |
Saint Michael ![]() Truefusion ![]() Best out of 7 wins, must give a reason for your vote |
|
|
|
Oct 26 2007, 04:09 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Trap17 Maverick ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 1,125 Joined: 5-January 06 From: Michigan, USA Member No.: 16,652 |
I vote for St.Michael's sig. It is well blended, colorful and I can readily recognize the render. The lighting effect is, as always in St.Michael's sigs, very nice. I am afraid I don't grasp Truefusion's render as easily and the colors are too monotone for my taste. Both techniques are well done tho.
QUOTE Saint Michael: 1
Truefusion: 0 |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2007, 04:06 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,564 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 ![]() |
I am going to bump this because of how quickly it disappear, and so hopefully people will notice and vote in it, thank you.
|
|
|
|
Dec 14 2007, 10:11 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 455 Joined: 14-March 07 From: Trap17 forum :) Member No.: 40,018 ![]() |
Definitely SAINT MICHAEL.. I found that sig quite cool.. Sorry truefusion.. I like yours too but SM's sig looks more intense..
SAINT MICHAEL : 2 TRUEFUSION : 0 I found truefusion's sig a bit dull and the text was not blended in too well for me.. I am a noob so forgive me if my comments were a little nooby |
|
|
|
Dec 14 2007, 02:40 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Privileged Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 505 Joined: 26-January 06 From: New Durham, NH Member No.: 17,651 |
Although I do like both of them, I have to say that I vote for TrueFusion.
Saint Michael's light effect is awesome, but it's not very useful if that's all that's going for him. Both signatures are rather washed out... SM's entire signature is rather dark, and it's hard to make out the character. His "HellGate London," although following with the color scheme, blends it into the whole thing. TrueFusion's sig is washed out in the aspect that everything is white-ish. Of course, this makes sense, but it could probably be better if the background was darkened SLIGHTLY to bring out his text and character even more. The text for both are of comparable competitiveness... if that made any sense. I really shouldn't be talking, since I don't even have a darn sig... but there's my critique. Saint Michael: 2 TrueFusion: 1 |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 03:06 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Member [Level 3] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 94 Joined: 27-March 07 Member No.: 40,712 |
I have to go with Saint Michaels signature, it blends well and has some decent lighting to it. Also the effects on it are pretty cool, I think the image could use a bit more contrast though.. Or well, a lot more contrast. I just don't like Truefusion's signature, I'm not trying to bash him but I just don't like the way it looks. Seems to plain and simple for me, no effects really and the text is simple.
Saint Michael: 3 TrueFusion: 1 |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 05:54 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Premium Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 190 Joined: 4-December 07 Member No.: 54,168 |
Truefusion.
and this vote is PURELY out of the fact that it's more to my taste. It has nothing to do with tallent...They're both equally tallented in my opinion. I just like the colours a little more. haha (please don't hate me). Saint Michael: 3 TrueFusion: 2 *edit* I also have something more to add. I like how on Truefusion's the grey, because it is lighter is takes the detail and texture onboard a lot easier, and is not a harsh darker colour like SM's. as the sigs are rather small, the detail that is important needs to be easy to see. Unfortunately, for SM's the darker it is, the more I'm likely to look past it. This post has been edited by strange-garden: Dec 15 2007, 08:22 AM |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 08:12 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
ZED ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 554 Joined: 21-August 06 From: Ziya's Heart Member No.: 28,693 |
My vote is for Saint Michael
His sig is well blended, name, pic everything. But it is a bit on darkish side, I believe sigs should be light as they are small. Truefusion's sig was bright but not blended well, which is more important. TF has taken this battle lightly and hasn't put much effort, I guess. Saint Michael: 4 TrueFusion: 2 |
|
|
|
Dec 15 2007, 09:37 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Ephesians 6:10-17 ![]() Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 1,916 Joined: 22-June 05 From: The World of Gentoo Member No.: 8,528 |
This Sig battle's winner is Saint_Michael: he got best out of 7. Congratulations, S_M.
Closing topic. |