|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Oct 26 2005, 06:57 PM
Post
#41
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 26-October 05 Member No.: 13,395 |
Of course wirnar, I always use winrar, one day I had winzip, OMG so much problems.
|
|
|
|
Oct 30 2005, 06:02 AM
Post
#42
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 30-October 05 Member No.: 13,560 |
i never triped wirnar... o_O i only used winzip and it worked perfectly fine to me
|
|
|
|
Oct 30 2005, 11:31 AM
Post
#43
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 220 Joined: 30-October 05 Member No.: 13,574 |
I use WinRAR, works for most archives.
There are a few free programs withc are getting better like 7-zip. For Zip archives , i use 7-zip i.s.o. WinZip. |
|
|
|
Oct 30 2005, 12:15 PM
Post
#44
|
|
|
Member [Level 2] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 76 Joined: 30-October 05 Member No.: 13,571 |
I like WinRAR more
It can release more file format than WinZip and the .rar files are much smaller than .zip |
|
|
|
Nov 1 2005, 11:56 PM
Post
#45
|
|
|
Privileged Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 661 Joined: 18-April 05 Member No.: 5,852 |
I personally think that Winzip is the best program you can get. I no longer use Winzip because my free trail has expired. If you do not mind paying the money to buy it I would highly recommend it. If you do not have money like me you should get something else (I just use the unzip utility that comes with Windows because I am cheap and it works pretty good if you only handle .zip files).
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2005, 04:43 AM
Post
#46
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 15 Joined: 4-November 05 Member No.: 13,784 |
ROAR!!
Er, sorry...I meant RAR |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2005, 07:50 AM
Post
#47
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 205 Joined: 3-September 05 Member No.: 11,447 |
though I have used winzip first I like the capability and ease of use of winar more, I have both on my systems though, I guess two is better than one |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2005, 11:52 AM
Post
#48
|
|
|
Premium Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 162 Joined: 1-November 05 From: SATA II Member No.: 13,683 |
at the beginning, i have use winzip, after winrar, I found that from file compress, files support, and the last one, it can build a .zip archive. and more important( if i'am not forget) it can open .tar.gz file. all is why i chooose RAR.
|
|
|
|
Nov 4 2005, 12:25 PM
Post
#49
|
|
|
Proud to be hosted ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 993 Joined: 11-July 04 From: NL Member No.: 75 |
I like winrar much more as winzip, a lot of files are destributed comprimised with winrar so they become .rar files, while winzip cant read these files. IF you reverse it, winrar can read zip files too, so its at least equal to winzip. Also, I like the less commercial look of winrar, and it isnt filled with useless features as winzip is.
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2006, 06:02 PM
Post
#50
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] ![]() |