Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register)



4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Faster Than Light Travel?, Thinking caps please!
mee
post Nov 19 2005, 09:42 PM
Post #21


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: 19-November 05
Member No.: 14,586



QUOTE(cse-icons @ Oct 10 2005, 03:22 PM)
I suppose that is a not your content and you should put it in Quotes. You can find the same here :

http://www.thebrinkofreality.com/forums/in...owtopic=76&st=0

Even if you have posted it there, you need to quote it here. and not put the entire thing as content.

Moreover the link that u gave states that:

Some of the weird science stuff has been removed, it was previously left here for the humour value.
Some people evidently don't have a sense of humour...





That's something of mine he quoted but I subsequently removed it.

Ignore the stuff in bold above, I wrote an article on the Cell (PS3) processor and people were using the alternate physics stuff to attack me, it was all meant to be removed anyway and that's the first thing I thought of.

It's not "real" physics and I never claimed otherwise but it turns out the idea I described for FTL travel is very similar to some other existing ideas which are considered quite respectable.

The problem is it requires an anti-gravity source to work (which I also wrote about), unfortunately if you write anything on that subject you are immediately considered a nut case.

I think the ideas have some validity but the descriptions were quite old and not well written, I'd planned to rewrite them anyway, one day I'll do that. In the mean time I've removed them.

BTW I should point out that I'm not disagreeing with Einstein, in fact it's all dependant on relativity (at least how I understand it).

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
fusionx
post Nov 28 2005, 02:04 PM
Post #22


Member [Level 1]
****

Group: Members
Posts: 60
Joined: 24-November 05
Member No.: 14,840



Let's leave this sort of stuff to the scientists and they would most likely find out how, why and when. Sure it would be great but it will only occur in like a few hundred years. So you won't be able to find out if it has been done or will be done. Unless you would like to invent a time machine and get a design on how to make it work.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SqlByte
post Nov 30 2005, 08:03 PM
Post #23


Premium Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 172
Joined: 18-August 05
Member No.: 10,836



QUOTE(apurva @ Oct 30 2005, 06:14 AM)
its been discovered that we can decrease and increase the speed of light.
*


its also discovered that we can teleport light !
but there is always but.. for now only on one nanometar... so thats not realy a lot isnt it rolleyes.gif
I think that its posible to travel faster then light, but not to us and definitly not now.

and why do you need faster then light to travel if you can go back in time when you travel as fast as light huh.gif but that is another topic.. that i need to search for cool.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
LeAnn Rimes My A...
post Nov 30 2005, 11:47 PM
Post #24


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 440
Joined: 27-May 05
From: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Member No.: 7,580



I saw an episode on the Learning Channel with a mathematical genious who calculated it is possible to travel faster than light. I don't know if an infinite amount of energy is needed, since infinity of anything doesn't exist (in my opinion). The solution they proposed was to use wormholes in space. And the example they used was a pizza (DON'T LAUGH... YET). One person demonstrated a worm hole by first throwing pizza toppings on top, and considered that the galaxy. Next, he took an object, and demonstrated regular space travel from one edge of the pizza to the other side. After that, he took the whole pizza, and folded it so that one of the sides made contact with the other. Taking that same object, travelling from one edge to the other is instant. As a result, that demonstrates a very simple example of a potential breakthrough in the future, once humans discover a way to use wormholes to travel great distances instantly in space.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cerebral Stasis
post Dec 1 2005, 05:32 PM
Post #25


Braindead by Default
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 5-November 05
From: United States of America
Member No.: 13,837



It seems to make perfect sense, Dark God. I don't see why so many people have put so much faith in Einstein's theory that nothing can pass the speed of light, since he had no proof, nor any way of testing his theory. Until we have the technology to see if that theory is fact, I suggest we keep an open mind and don't get ahead of ourselves.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
CrazyRob
post Dec 9 2005, 11:39 AM
Post #26


ITS ALIVE.....MUHHHAAAA
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 531
Joined: 17-October 05
From: Chippenham UK
Member No.: 13,031



QUOTE(goldinero @ Oct 18 2005, 03:27 AM)
At one time peopl believed the world was flat.  Later, they believed that traveling at the speed of a locamotive would be dangerous to humans.  Then they believed that human flight was impossible.  Again they thought supersonic flight was unachievable.

Of course, now we know they were all wrong.  And it is only a matter of time before someone shows not with an equation, but with physical evidence, that E=mc^2 is does not define the upper speed limit of travel most places in the universe.
*


i sont understand why peope then believed thta the world was flat that is crazy man
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cerebral Stasis
post Dec 9 2005, 06:37 PM
Post #27


Braindead by Default
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 713
Joined: 5-November 05
From: United States of America
Member No.: 13,837



It's because few Easterners (if any) knew of the Americas, but quite a few had gone in that general direction and never returned, so they assumed that there was some kind of dropoff or monster that stopped the sailors, and noone was brave enough to set sail and find out.

With the little scientific knowledge they had, the concept of a flat world made perfect sense at the time, just like how our knowledge of the earth being round makes perfect sense now. All one can do is take all avaliable facts and derive a conclusion based on the evidence at hand.

Remember, we're talking about a time during which there were four elements; earth, sky, water, and fire.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
juice
post Sep 15 2006, 03:15 PM
Post #28


Premium Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 183
Joined: 24-July 06
From: Cape Town
Member No.: 27,194



As far as I know nothing and absolutly nothing can travel faser than light. Eistien said that E=MC˛ which means Energy equals matter travelling at the speed of light sqared. What am I typing? blink.gif It says as soon as matter reaches the speed of light sqarred it turns into energy. You know what? Time is an illusion and it does't exist tongue.gif I live my life not worrying about these things. A little while ago, people thought the world was flat and if you went to the edge you would fall off, how crazy is that!

This post has been edited by juice: Sep 15 2006, 03:16 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
salamangkero
post Sep 15 2006, 04:49 PM
Post #29


Super Member
*********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 492
Joined: 15-August 06
From: Philippines
Member No.: 28,387



I believe that time does exist and its effects are readily observable. The very concept of movement is an effect of the transition of time. However, I digress.

Someone once hypothesized the existence of particles called tachyons. These things were believed to travel faster than light. Not only that, they were also believed to operate in "reverse time".

Consider an effects of Einstein's relativity equation: Time Dilation. What this means is that moving clocks tick slower than those that stay still and that apple halves propelled near the speed of light brown slower than those lying still. Note how time approaches zero as the speed of an object approaches the speed of light.

Now, what happens when the speed of an object, heaven help us, exceeds the speed of light? It is quite intuitive to assume that time, too, will slow down beyond zero, in effect, turn negative, thus the concept of "reverse