 What Processor Do You Prefer? |
|
|
|
|
  |
 Feb 19 2006, 03:36 PM
Post
#21
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2]  Group: Members Posts: 35 Joined: 18-February 06 Member No.: 18,833  |
Now i am really confused! Which Intel or AMD (The model please)
|
 |
 
|
|
Feb 19 2006, 04:26 PM
Post
#22
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 6-February 06 From: Croatia(Zagreb) Member No.: 18,321 |
I prefer AMD , not just beacuse I have AMD but beacuse I do not like Intel , Intel had the monopol in the processor production and when AMD came I choose it just to get rid of Intel
 And now AMD is much better (to me presonaly) then Intel even by performances , AMD is just what I need !
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 23 2006, 10:00 AM
Post
#23
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 23-February 06 Member No.: 19,042 |
I prefer INTEL because of cool INTEL D Processors. I have also one
 840D
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 21 2006, 10:20 AM
Post
#24
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 20-March 06 Member No.: 20,390 |
If your idea is use the CPU with his original values i advice you to use the INTEL .
If you want to buy cheat processors and then overclock them, amd is better as the allow you to get values wich you must spend much more money to get them with intel processors... 
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 22 2006, 08:49 PM
Post
#25
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 104 Joined: 13-January 06 Member No.: 17,010 |
I like AMD over Intel for a number of reason, one of the main reasons is simply that you get more for the money that you pay and both are typically stable processor to buy. I currently have an Athlon 64 3000+ which I am very happy with and had no problems with, I also used to have a few Athlon XPs (2500 and 2800) and also a couple of durons (1.3 and 1.6) which all were great. I am not looking forward to getting an Althon X2 over a Pentium D because once again the price differences for similar performance and also the general concensus is that AMD is better for gaming which is one of the major reasons why I continue to upgrade my processor.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 23 2006, 02:57 PM
Post
#26
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 21-March 06 Member No.: 20,449 |
I prefer use AMD x2 to Intel 955..
i think AMD is the best.. |
|
|
|
|
Mar 25 2006, 01:09 AM
Post
#27
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 57 Joined: 24-March 06 Member No.: 20,628 |
i always used intel, so i voted for it.
Intel Celeron 2.0Ghz  It runs everything i need: Counter strike 1.6  Condition Zero Tibia :
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 1 2007, 07:52 PM
Post
#28
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 24-July 07 Member No.: 46,958 |
AMD ftw!!
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 12 2007, 08:34 PM
Post
#29
|
|
|
Super Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 436 Joined: 3-January 07 From: The West Side Member No.: 36,424 |
QUOTE The only downside of this processor is that it is having less l2 cache and that is of only 512 kb...i would have been better if it was either 1 mb or 2 mb. I dont know how it is possible that processor of speed of 2.0 Ghz is able to compete with Intel's 3.0 Ghz and that is the reason why they call it 3000+..strange huh? Really depends on what you're running. Several benchmarks have shown that games don't care too much about cache as long as you have at least 512kb, more than that makes no difference. Also, keep in mind the important fact that AMD and Intel run very differently, so where cache may be important for one, for the other, that might not be the case. The reason why the AMD 2.0 ghz is branded 3000+ is because in benchmarks, it's able to perform better than an Intel counterpart running at 3.0 ghz. |
|
|
|
