Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register)



4 Pages V  < 1 2 3 4 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Window Media Player Or Winamp?, Which one you like?
Lozbo
post Sep 6 2005, 06:45 AM
Post #21


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 282
Joined: 1-September 05
From: Wanatos
Member No.: 11,382



I agree with most of you, winamp for music and windows media for video. Though i like winamp the most, as you can watch video in winamp too... And as i have a lot of music, i usually store all of it in one only winamp list, (i load it all once) and then i click on shuffle and i start listening to random bands.

Windows media i generally use it for radio, although i just listen to one or two stations, i dont usually do that, becouse theres never the kind of music i like in radio, some times the stations playin are actually harder to find, or i just havent dig well enough.

I dislike wmp, its really slower, a lot, and its not as personalizable as winamp. Well its not that i hate it, couse its useful sometimes, but i go rather for nullsoft winamp. I used to run v2 but there it said that later versions had fixed some security bugs so i upgraded to v5. I dont use plug ins anymore, just skins in some machines.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
drenomus
post Sep 6 2005, 02:04 PM
Post #22


Member [Level 1]
****

Group: Members
Posts: 71
Joined: 31-August 05
Member No.: 11,356



i have both, but i prefer windows media player because dont have so many windows, but the winap have more codecs (the codec OGG vorbis) and better sound.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
vibutx
post Sep 6 2005, 03:06 PM
Post #23


Newbie [Level 3]
***

Group: Members
Posts: 48
Joined: 6-September 05
Member No.: 11,558



I always use Windows media player for movies and stuff but when it comes to music i use winamp because its much better to use its easier easy features.

ViButX
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
.hack//GU
post Sep 5 2007, 10:03 AM
Post #24


Premium Member
********

Group: Members
Posts: 190
Joined: 21-October 05
Member No.: 13,185



first time we opened WMP it will conquer most of desktop area, whilst WinAmp only took a portion of it.
That's why I thought WinAmp is better.

Anyway, in functionality I don't really think much of it because I used them both for listening music.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Renaissance
post Sep 6 2007, 03:42 AM
Post #25


Premium Member
********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 183
Joined: 10-May 07
From: ONT, Canada
Member No.: 42,906



I know it's been said before (by other people) but I guess it just lends to the truth; I use Windows Media Player for videos and Winamp for audio.

Winamp has an arguably better playlist and a much better equalizer with highly functional presets. An example is the preset for Headphones/Laptop speakers, it greatly improves the sound quality/clarity.

The one thing Winamp has against it are the memory leaks...

This post has been edited by Renaissance: Sep 6 2007, 03:43 AM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Unknown_99
post Sep 8 2007, 09:52 PM
Post #26


Advanced Member
*******

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 114
Joined: 8-September 07
Member No.: 49,636



I have them both but I prefer Winamp as it seems to take up less virtual memory space than Windows Media Player plus the skins for Winamp are quite cool looking.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
androomidaa
post Sep 10 2007, 01:47 PM
Post #27


Newbie [Level 1]
*

Group: Members
Posts: 22
Joined: 10-September 07
Member No.: 49,727



QUOTE(heavensounds @ Aug 23 2005, 07:01 PM) *
well, i must say that winamp is my favorite! There are several reasons...First I think it is esteticaly speaking a lot more beautiful than Windows Media Player (WMP). Than I think it works faster evethough it is not directly implemented in windows. If you have a slow computer than winamp should be your choice without any fancy skins or stuff like that. It also takes less ram and eats less disk space. It also has many more plug-ins and other adds than WMP and the most important thing is it is A LOT more simple to use. Than there is media library and internet radio. I think that winamp offers wider and better range of internet radios than WMP, although i don't really know how good WMP's are smile.gif

All in all....I LIKE WINAMP!!!!!!!!!!!! laugh.gif laugh.gif

man you just have said my words! winamp is my absolute favorite. rolleyes.gif i dont like windows media players. for me its a crap. i dont like the interface of windows media player. winamp is cool. its a good looking player with lots of good skins and i really like the sound quality. i have few plugins which does the fancy editing for me and i like the surround sound system that i make with those plug ins. for slower pc's (like my p3, its always better if you use older versions. well 5.3 is still okay but sometimes it slows down the computer. but you know nothing compares with good sound.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint_Michael
post Sep 10 2007, 11:40 PM
Post #28


$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3
*********************

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 6,560
Joined: 21-September 04
From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\
Member No.: 1,218
T17 GFX Crew



I think it was the fact that it was back in the day when winamp was first coming out I didn't get a good grasp of how to use it, but for my needs WMP was good enough, of couse I use other programs to watch movies, such as interactual and cineplayer (when I need to). I did like to listen to the radio on WMP though back when I was in Washington while killing time at the office, I picked up a lot if techno radio stations and junk. Now I don't listen to much radio to begin with except for Sports radio and stuff, did have a classic rock binge last year but thats about it though.

This post has been edited by Saint_Michael: Sep 10 2007, 11:43 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
faund
post Sep 11 2007, 01:05 AM
Post #29


Advanced Member
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 128
Joined: 7-September 07
From: Ningbo, China
Member No.: 49,552



Window Media Player I use.

Reason is Window Media Player need not install and it features is enough.