|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Feb 13 2008, 10:06 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Privileged Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 598 Joined: 13-December 06 Member No.: 35,271 |
Web 3.0 is coming! Css3, Html 5.0, gonna be awesome. So many changes will happen to the internet world. I doubt many websites will use them untill ages though, normally what happens.
Good find, nice read. |
|
|
|
Feb 14 2008, 11:47 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Trap Grand Marshal Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 1,308 Joined: 11-January 06 From: Chennai, India Member No.: 16,932 |
this is really a great news. The HTML 5 draft introduce a bunch of new elements and attributes to existing elements.
The HTML 5 will make the web pages more sensible and the data can be properly categorized as header, content or side bar using the newer elements like <header></header>, <section></section> & <aside></aside> |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2008, 05:32 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Privileged Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 598 Joined: 13-December 06 Member No.: 35,271 |
this is really a great news. The HTML 5 draft introduce a bunch of new elements and attributes to existing elements. The HTML 5 will make the web pages more sensible and the data can be properly categorized as header, content or side bar using the newer elements like <header></header>, <section></section> & <aside></aside> oooo, nice. Looks intresting. But couldn't you already do all that with a <div> tag? |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2008, 06:27 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. ![]() Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 3,971 Joined: 24-July 05 From: In Trouble Again... still? Member No.: 9,787 ![]() |
According to this link http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-html5-diff-20...2/#new-elements , the header, Footer, etc tags will be used for structuring a page. Might be useful. Perhaps avoid problems with floats and div placement. header would always be at the top of the page, Footers always at the bottom.
|
|
|
|
Feb 15 2008, 08:07 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Privileged Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 661 Joined: 31-August 06 From: Singapore Member No.: 29,189 |
How fast can we actually expect HTML 5.0 to kick in?
I don't think it will be anytime soon, probably a few years down the road. And even so, what is the percentage of websites adhering to it? Browsers have to do lots of work too. FireFox 3 is highly unlikely to be able to support HTML 5.0, it isn't even officially released by W3C yet. Our best bet could be IE8 but I don't know about any plans regading FireFox, Safari and Opera |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2008, 02:14 PM
Post
#16
|
|
|
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. ![]() Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 3,971 Joined: 24-July 05 From: In Trouble Again... still? Member No.: 9,787 ![]() |
Found another reference to HTML5 on the W3schools site: http://www.w3schools.com/tags/html5.asp
Lists of the elements/attributes/etc that are new to html5 and also the 'not supported' tags are also listed. Interesting to note the DOM Events that will be added to HTML5, like 'contenteditable'. Interesting stuff. A blending of javascript and xhtml into a web page. Maybe I'll start learning javascript or Ajax next... likely be handy in HTML5. |
|
|
|
Feb 15 2008, 04:50 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 417 Joined: 6-May 07 Member No.: 42,685 |
Hmm, this is pretty interesting stuff. I just glanced at the draft relatively quckly, but from what I can tell, if you are already using CSS, alot of this won't have a negative effect. The biggest effect of this will be to those that insist on not learning CSS and doing everything in HTML. XD
This post has been edited by DeM0nFiRe: Feb 15 2008, 04:50 PM |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|