|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Sep 12 2006, 07:38 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 73 Joined: 3-August 06 From: Rosepine,Lousiana Member No.: 27,721 |
I don't know but from what I heard some people used their hand(which is so gross)
|
|
|
|
Sep 12 2006, 08:26 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 22-April 05 Member No.: 6,024 |
Yeah, thats a good question. It remind me of the question I used to ask myself as a lady. How did the women do with their ..you know.. I guess its called 'period' in english. But yeah how did they do that? I mean sounds a bit nasty thinking they just let it out too. And wouldn't they think, with the lack of knowledge they had then, that they were bleeding to death? But I shouldn't go off topic.
So to make a story short, I think they used leaves, or soft tree cortex maybe? |
|
|
|
Sep 12 2006, 10:05 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 294 Joined: 28-January 06 Member No.: 17,798 |
uh back in those days they prolly used leaves i guess i dont know...if not they prolly had to spread their *arse* cheeks mad wide n let it all out without leaving anything behind lol because thats just too uncomfortable to be tolerating with that sh-- lol
|
|
|
|
Nov 11 2006, 12:10 PM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Member [Level 3] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 97 Joined: 11-October 06 Member No.: 31,451 |
I guess people might have been using cloth or paper or tree bark or maybe just water and hands.
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2006, 05:35 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
The Bogey Princess ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 638 Joined: 25-April 05 Member No.: 6,138 |
Haha... interesting topic. Though I've thought of the same thing as Nani_Cheri. I think they had cloth for it... or at least animal hide. For the pre-toilet paper stuff, I think they'd use anything. O_o If they have no other choice, they probably use their hands... (ew) But of course, I'm sure they have water for that. I still think they use their hands as a last resort because it'll reaaally stink and people they meet will get grossed out. They probably used anything like leaves and other stuff.
I'm so thankful I'm living in an age where it's pretty hygienic. |
|
|
|
Nov 12 2006, 06:02 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Premium Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 179 Joined: 25-May 06 Member No.: 24,253 |
i thought they used there hands, cuz there was this one story about it but i forgot, i think your left hand is your wiping hand.... anyway, it was disgusting no matter what they used, back before toliet paper things were not as hygenic as today anyway.
|
|
|
|
Nov 12 2006, 06:39 PM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Member [Level 2] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 88 Joined: 1-June 06 From: CA Member No.: 24,603 |
They must have used leaves, I mean who on this earth would want to use their hands to clean up their own business? Animals don't even do that. They poop and leave. And I don't they had enough animal hide or cloth back in those days.
I think they used leaves until they thought that using leaves started getting nasty. I wonder if they ever come across poison ivy. xD |
|
|
|
May 10 2008, 12:39 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Hail Caesar! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 5,876 Joined: 21-September 07 Member No.: 50,369 |
Be grateful you have toiletpaper
Before The Toilet Paper You may not believe this, but it was once common practice in rural America to leave a corncob hanging from a string in the outhouse for purposes of personal hygiene. The string, I gather, was to permit the cob to be reused. For those who were punctilious in these matters, or else blessed with an abundance of corncobs, a box of disposable cobs might be provided instead. In coastal regions, the cob might be replaced by a mussel shell. For those who had access to it, paper from discarded books or newspapers was often preferred to either of the foregoing. The meteoric growth of the Sears Roebuck company, for instance, is thought to be partly attributable to the protean nature of its catalogs, which, historians tells us, might serve a family of regular habits for an entire season. As with the cob, the catalog would be hung in the outhouse on a string and pages torn off as needed. It is said the use of coated stock, which was nonabsorbent, was a source of great consternation to farm families when Sears began printing color pictures in the catalog earlier in this century. English lords, in attempting to teach their sons to be cultivated gentlemen, often advised purchasing an inexpensive volume of verse for use in the loo. The idea, of course, was that while you were sitting there in a contemplative state you would be able to read a few stanzas, subsequent to which the paper could be put to other ends, so to speak. -reply by Ravynmoon835 |
|
|
|
Aug 16 2008, 01:58 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 109 Joined: 10-June 08 From: Greece Member No.: 63,457 |
I was watching Brainiac (The history abuse one) the other day and they were trying to see what's best to wipe your butt with. They got toilet paper, a brush, some other thing I can't remember, and a guy with his left arm... yikes. They made elastic butts and added stuff in them (pretty much goo-y stuff like jelly), It was either the brush or the arm that won xD
|