*sigh* So much talk about iPods, I totally want one, A normal iPod would be fine, I don't even care about colour or Photo Viewing. Is the shuffle really that bad, I've heard it was good for not having a screen, then again I've heard that not having a screen really kills it.

The iPod has the advantage that no other competitors has -- Sleek, Compact, Elegant design.

It can be controlled by one hand exclusively, and with a nice interface, the iPod Photo wins -- hands down.

This combined with the iTunes music jukebox, makes it an instant winner.

The iPod photo has a very clear aryllic screen that is highly pollished. Most Mp3 players doesn't. Whenever you are shopping for a screen, the easier it is scratched, means the more it is pollished. The more it is pollished, means the higher grade glassed that has been used.

The iPod offers a stunning LCD screen with very bright pixells that can illuminate a room, and draw attention like the monochrome iPods can not.

The iPod winner is a beginning of the Color-Screen mp3 wars. Many manufactures has adopted, but apparently the (Un)Creative mp3s hasn't.

My friend got one, but he doesnt uses it for photos. He only puts music on it. But he only got like 4GB music. So i think if you only gonna use it for music you better buy an Ipod mine like it did. Its cheaper and 4GB is more then anouf music i think
Ipod roxx

Now a music player takes photo's... I dont even need Ipod, because I like to listen to certain music at different times. This is just another perfect example on how major companies are taking advatage of their fortunes in an attempt to lure customers to buy more pointless cra...

~Darker333

i didnt like the look of the shuffle and yeah from the reviews i heard it itsnt really that nice to use.
id prefer the ipod mini though~

the photo ipod looks nice, but its a little pricey for me..so id stick with the lesser priced one

i thoght the the ipod photo could only view photos not capture them.