Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register)



2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Speed Test Results For Free Web Hosting Services, A comparison of Benchmark tests
jlhaslip
post Feb 28 2008, 09:53 AM
Post #1


A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.
Group Icon

Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 3,744
Joined: 24-July 05
From: In Trouble Again... still?
Member No.: 9,787
Spam Patrol



The graph says it all.

Trap17 placed 5th out of 28 Free Web Hosts in a Benchmark test performed in 2006. Not too shabby...

For comparison, I set up the same benchmark on my Laptop and the Trap17 results were better by half the average of the test results. My Laptop would have placed around 23rd on that original test, if those results are still valid as posted. There is a WoW! factor when a Hosting service can beat a local single user test. Mind you, there is now data transmission involved, only the results are sent across the web, so as fast as my machine is, the Trap is faster... and this test was only one process for the Server. Mine was the only thing being done on my machine at the time the test ran. Another WoW!

Test Results Here

I wonder what the results would be today with all the improvements and the new equipment?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lemonwonder
post Feb 28 2008, 10:24 AM
Post #2


Super Member
*********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 343
Joined: 28-July 06
Member No.: 27,449



I'd say that they'd have to be even better! Congratz trap17!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
OpaQue
post Feb 28 2008, 12:30 PM
Post #3


Administrator
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 1,436
Joined: 11-June 04
From: Somewhere in Time & Space.
Member No.: 1



I will tell you the inside Story. Most web hosting companies maintain the average load of server at 10.00.

At Xisto, We target 1.0. :-) Thereby, We proudly say that we do NOT oversell smile.gif

I am glad that you ran this test and bought the result out :-) I am sure, all members who have a doubt about our free hosting quality will reconsider us.

I will agree that our hosting system is not that great or our free hosting registration steps are a bit hectic and require some patience and understanding. But, when it comes to Web Hosting Uptime, Features, Quality and Performance, We are ready to challenge even the BIG Players of the market.

Thank you jlhaslip for posting the results. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
BuffaloHELP
post Feb 28 2008, 03:37 PM
Post #4


Desperately seeking "any key" to continue...
Group Icon

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,378
Joined: 23-April 05
From: Trap17 storage box
Member No.: 6,042



I'm going to be such an optimist here and say, "we're not the 5th but tied for 4th place!" HA HA HA

In case the web page is no longer available, I have made the page to a PDF. Download file is posted for future reference of this post's result.

Attached File  free_php_hosting_services_comparison_benchmark_results.pdf ( 91.23k ) Number of downloads: 4
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
heavensounds
post Feb 28 2008, 04:35 PM
Post #5


Super Member
*********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 489
Joined: 15-March 05
Member No.: 4,538



That is a great result! However, speed is not the only thing that makes a host good. I think that the best thing about TRAP17 is that things just work! You never have to worry that things won't work as long as you post at these forums!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Saint_Michael
post Feb 28 2008, 06:26 PM
Post #6


$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3
*********************

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 6,059
Joined: 21-September 04
From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\
Member No.: 1,218
T17 GFX Crew



Well although that data is 2 years old and especially since 2005-06 were the rough years of trap I would say it was impressive, of course I uploaded that script and tested it out on my account and the lowest score I got was 42 for the benchmark with a spike of 127ms, but since I don't have accounts for those other hosts I don't know if it is bad or good thing. However, compared to the data of 2 years ago trap has slowed down a little bit, regardless though trap17 is still number one.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FlameX
post Feb 29 2008, 07:34 PM
Post #7


Newbie [Level 3]
***

Group: Members
Posts: 46
Joined: 26-December 07
From: India , Mumbai
Member No.: 55,296



Yuppppy trap is one of the toppers .. though it was 2 years back nevermind ... >>
i sincerely thank the moderators who look after Trap so well ..

3 cheers to the mods ..
hip hip hurray ..
hip hip hurray !!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
elhadi
post Mar 12 2008, 01:47 PM
Post #8


Advanced Member
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 111
Joined: 5-March 08
Member No.: 58,909



Niccccccccccccccccceeeeeeeeeee TRAP17 is the best
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lailai
post Apr 3 2008, 08:04 AM
Post #9


Newbie [Level 3]
***

Group: Members
Posts: 43
Joined: 8-December 07
Member No.: 54,414



I see that before, but good work trap17