 Anthlon Vs. Pentium, Which is better U decide |
|
|
|
|
  |
 Feb 14 2005, 11:10 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2]  Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 13-February 05 Member No.: 3,744  |
amd is beter 1000 times.....
for the same mony you got beter, stabled and faster cpu..... what more is imporant????? |
 |
 
|
|
Feb 15 2005, 01:39 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 55 Joined: 29-January 05 From: US Member No.: 3,484 |
I have alot of different opinions on this subject:
I believe that pentiums adververtisement its most simple, because it uses the primary GHZ format rather than Athlons secondary, complicated understanding of the ways. But then of course Athon is a lot more cheap than pentium. And then of course, pentium is lightyears ahead of techonlogy, But of course, Athlons recommended for gaming (in which i am a gamer) Oh yea! Pentiums got a cool snazzy logo! Pentiums better !   J 2 da MBOT |
|
|
|
|
Feb 21 2005, 11:46 AM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 50 Joined: 21-February 05 Member No.: 3,890 |
Hello !
I prefer Athlons because The last (Barton architectury) is very faster than Pentium IV C ! The problem is that we can do a overclocking on a Pentium but not on a Athlon... Because It's warming up very easly  !Bye ! |
|
|
|
|
Feb 22 2005, 08:56 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 20-February 05 From: Mangalore, India Member No.: 3,871 |
Hey guys,
Don't fight over what is spam there are people assigned to see to stuff like that. Did you ever wonder how it would feel to go to vote for your favourite processor and find people quarreling over spam? (Although it was fun to read)  I like Athlon excellent price to performance ratio in the performance market (Although Duron is the best overall). Barton is not that good. The best arch was Throughbred B. Barton clock lags a lot and its cache doesn't help it much. The worst part about AMD is no SSE3. I feel ashmed to see the comparision chart of a Celeron D and an Athlon64. Athlon has to eat Celeron dust. Can you believe it???
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22 2005, 09:12 AM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 218 Joined: 13-January 05 Member No.: 3,267 |
at first i preferd Intel....but when A64 came on the market.....i swithced sides:D
...A 64 3800 ( which is not too expensive) is better then P4 3,46 GhZ EE (which cost more then 1000$)....so thereis no doubt who is better.... and AMD's FX-55 is the most powerfull desktop processor....so Intel has no chance..for now |
|
|
|
 Feb 24 2005, 04:42 AM
Post
#16
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 20-February 05 From: Mangalore, India Member No.: 3,871 |
Don't underestimate in Intel. I don't think you know about the PentiumEE, this 32 bit kicked Athlon64FX butt. It was way too expensive, thats a different question.
And don't tell Intel doesn't have any chance. Forgot what happened to GeForce6800 when Radeon X800 stepped in??? Intel has already registered the trademark for its 64bit dual core proc (Intel VIIV). You never know what's cooking in the foundry!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 24 2005, 11:28 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Privileged Member Group: Members Posts: 622 Joined: 30-October 04 From: Philippines Member No.: 2,049 |
I'm a Video Editor. I use MediaStudio 7. So, what kind of processor will you recommend? I want the rendering to be faster.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 26 2005, 05:57 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 241 Joined: 20-February 05 From: Mangalore, India Member No.: 3,871 |
If you want something for video editing then just close your eyes and go for the SSE3 processors. I'll tell you I have seen a Celeron D beat a Athlon 64 FX in video benchmarks.
|
|
|
|
|
Mar 3 2005, 12:10 PM
Post
#19
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 245 Joined: 3-March 05 Member No.: 4,125 |
pricewise, i would go for an Athlon.
but for high-end graphics & video editing, nothing beats a good Pentium. on my older computers, (PII vs K3) the pentium was much faster, tho the gap now is pretty much closed now, IMO. |
|
|
|