The people who are against abortion are usually also against animal euthanasia and this kind of stuff in general. However, in the case of euthanasia, there is another argument involved: intention. The people who are considering euthanasia are generally very nervous about the subject, even if the patient does try to persuade them. If the procedure goes on, it goes on out of love, and not hate.

If a person goes ahead and does an abortion because it will cost her a little money that she can afford, I'd say not to let her. But if the woman has a genuine reason, such as if that little money is only just affordable, and they need it to make ends meet, then I'd say let her, because she's doing it out of love for her unborn fetus and doesn't want it to live a harsh, cruel life when it becomes a baby. I don't think the child can be made a ward of the state, or adopted, that easily.

Reading this i see a lot of two sided minds.

Abortion is not black and white. For one, I am against having an abortion but very much for allowing people to have the choice. Another obvious issue is the humanity of an abortion. Stop saying it's murder please. It isn't murder. Anything that is under controversy cannot be set as one thing. Murder is not even something that can be proven, it is the conception of an opinion. Trials are chosen by jury in my country, by people making opinions.

Another point is i see a lot of people saying the mother "deserves the baby" because she made "a bad decision."
I am sorry that i do not see having sex as a bad decision. I think sex is a normal thing that should be enjoyed as often as possible. However, i do agree if you do not protect yourself and prepare yourself for the consequences you are making a mistake. But saying a baby is punishment for such a mistake? WHo is it punishing? If the mother feels like the baby is a punishment she will resent the child and it will grow up to probably have some psychopathic disorders because of a bad childhood. In such case would it not have been better if the baby was aborted, to save the quality of life for one mother rather than delve two people into a bad life?

Another argument i disagree with the validity of is the argument that an abortion will cause regret for the rest of the wpuld-be-parent's life. Obviously, they know what will come of them not having the child. It is a decision. I'm sure, X-Rated Content Ahead, people who masturbate do not feel remorse for the potential children they killed off. These people can always become impregnated again, women have somewhere around 750k eggs at birth.

Pro-Choice for life. Anti Abortion. Atheism Ponderer.


/signed Chris.

I disagree.
Abortion : For Or Against Abortion?

I'm sorry... But I disagree. It is not just a moral. After a mother terminates the life in her womb she grieves, regrets and hates the choice that she has made. She knows that what ever was growing inside of her was apart of her. It had something that belonged to her in them creating something no scientist could.

-reply by cubanita

Abortion
Abortion : For Or Against Abortion?

I think abortion is wrong it should only take place if the mothers life is at risk.Parents choose to have children if they can't look after them then shouldn't go through with having unprotected sex.I also believe the father has a right whether the woman should have an abortion

-reply by Adeel

I am pro choice, I believe a couple should be able to decide whether or not they should proceed to allow the pregnancy to fully develop. What happens when the child comes with severe deformations, its a rape pregnancy, it endangers the life of the mother, and for less develop countries it endanger the well being of a whole family. Some family out there might simply not have the resources to feed one more mouth, I know we have it nice here in the U.S. but what about in third world countries? Is it responsible to allow one more life to come to live just to suffer?

This is my opinion..
Abortion : For Or Against Abortion?

Abortion is murder! no matter what, a child in the woom of it's mother is still a living thing, and born in the you.S. As a person you are entitled to all of your rights... Disregarding of age. If a women is not ready for the commitment of a child then she should not put herself in a position where she knows that it may be possible to conceive a child. Rape, and inscest are different but in any other case it is just plain wrong, you are taking the life of someone away. Which regarding to the 5th and 14th amendment is unconstitutional, aginst the law, its homicide it's murder.

-reply by heyoh!

I would vote for and only under EXTREME circumstances, I.E the child will die 1-2 weeks after birth, the baby was made from rape, it was an accident from a split condom where emergency failed or it was under aged, with them been careful.

In the old testament, god says if a man shall strike a woman causing her to lose her child he shall pay a fine. But if the woman dies, a life for a life.
Clearly, the christian god places little value on the unborn, so the entire religious "I'm a Christian" argument is baseless.
A fetus is nothing. It doesn't have the right to bear arms, or freedom of speech, or any other rights. Abortion is a tragedy for the woman. Not for the fetus.
Religious people are trying to use the govt. to enforce a religious law, not even supported by their religion, on the rest of society, which violates the constitution, which Bush called "that goddamn piece of paper".
Abortion is sad, but I don't want to tell others what to do with their genitals, so long as they're not hurting anybody.