|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
May 24 2006, 01:26 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 486 Joined: 9-April 06 From: The UK Member No.: 21,584 |
MY MISTAKE - DIDN'T REALISE YOU COULDN'T EDIT A POLL AFTER - HERE ARE THE CORRECT FOCUS DISTANCES:
* Sigma 150mm = 38.0 cm Sigma Four Thirds * Sigma 105mm = 31.3 cm Sigma Four Thirds * Olympus 35mm = 15 cm Olympus 35mm MACRO * Olympus 50mm = 28.0 cm Olympus 50mm MACRO hey guys and gals; Anyway I am forcefully narrowed to the four above and would appreciate any help choosing the correct one from someones who may know a little more. I do have a short-ish lens that has allowed me to do some (close to)macro photograph, but I really would like to have a dedicated lens to get much closer to the subject for proper MACRO photos. I am not sure of the benefits between a 30mm MACRO lens and a long focal lengthed 150mm, except I did work out that the 150mm would be able to produce closer images than the others (if I got it wrong please tell me!) but the only thing I can think of is the mobility and being able to get angles from below easier and also that a longer focal length would create a more blurred background. Unfortunately the prices are quite expensive but it would be nice to look at these without considering the prices in mind as I would be able to save and get the one that would suit and last me for a long time. Are there any strong advantages between a longer focal length or a short one for MACRO photography??? Thanks This post has been edited by Jimmy: May 24 2006, 04:53 PM |
|
|
|
May 26 2006, 10:23 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 486 Joined: 9-April 06 From: The UK Member No.: 21,584 |
surely theres someone with a bit of knowledge about d-slr lenses?
anyone able to recommend anything? Thanks |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topics | Topics | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th July 2008 - 10:48 AM |