Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register)



 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Linux® Trademark?
bureX
post Aug 28 2005, 12:32 PM
Post #1


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 318
Joined: 5-January 05
Member No.: 3,136



http://www.linuxmark.org/

QUOTE
The registered trademark Linux® is used pursuant to a license from Linus Torvalds, owner of the mark in the U.S. and other countries.


What's going on here? It seems that Linus Torvalds (the creator of Linux) realised that he can make some cash with his creation - actually, it's NAME! Linux is now a registered trademark, and you must pay ( http://www.linuxmark.org/fees.html ) in order to use it in your distribution name!

QUOTE
As stated in our articles of incorporation, The Linux Mark Institute ("LMI") is an organization established "to protect the public and Linux® users of the world from unauthorized and confusing use of the Linux mark and to issue proper licenses to authorized users of the Linux mark."  LMI is not designed to generate profits for anyone, which is why Linus Torvalds has given LMI primary sub-license rights for the mark. We work to protect legitimate uses of the LINUX trademark without burdening Linus Torvalds or any one entity with the financial responsibility of protecting the LINUX community's use of the mark.


If you are panicing, don't! Linux is still free, but it's name isn't! I think that that's not such a big problem, is it? SUSE linux will simply be called e.g. "SUSE", RedHat Linux will simply be called e.g. "RedHat OS"... Remember: This does not affect Linux users in any way!

However, it's a bit confusing to see that Linus Torvalds decided to take this step...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mayank
post Aug 28 2005, 01:12 PM
Post #2


Mankie
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 761
Joined: 22-July 05
From: New Delhi, India
Member No.: 9,746



well i think its good that Linus Torvalds has taken this step...because one can imagine the hardwork he had put in to make the linux and his greatness to keep it open source...and if he asking some share of that from the corporates then its fine!!!
at least END USER is not getting effected with that!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mahesh2k
post Aug 28 2005, 01:54 PM
Post #3


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 324
Joined: 23-January 05
From: India
Member No.: 3,388



So much talk is going on wiiht this name.anyway what you think why MS claims it is illegal to use Linux.
Steve balmer claiming it broken 1000 patents.right.
What are your views?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
iscatel
post Sep 11 2006, 11:22 AM
Post #4


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 8
Joined: 11-September 06
Member No.: 29,790



QUOTE(bureX @ Aug 28 2005, 08:32 AM) *

http://www.linuxmark.org/
What's going on here? It seems that Linus Torvalds (the creator of Linux) realised that he can make some cash with his creation - actually, it's NAME! Linux is now a registered trademark, and you must pay ( http://www.linuxmark.org/fees.html ) in order to use it in your distribution name!
If you are panicing, don't! Linux is still free, but it's name isn't! I think that that's not such a big problem, is it? SUSE linux will simply be called e.g. "SUSE", RedHat Linux will simply be called e.g. "RedHat OS"... Remember: This does not affect Linux users in any way!

However, it's a bit confusing to see that Linus Torvalds decided to take this step...


Have you people no knowledge of history?

Here goes, you can use your favorite search engine to fill in the blanks, names, dates, etc to your heart's content.

Linus Torvolds did not take this step. He came up with the name, built the initial community, got the whole thing going, but failed to copywrite the name Linux. Some slimeball in the US did, and the powers that be allowed him to. This guy was never part of the community, contributed nothing, and when he felt the time was right, started to try to cash in by threatening various distributions, demanding $$$$$ from them because he "owned" the name, at least according to the US government. His ploy never made him any money. The community got together and threatened legal action (mail fraud, etc) against both said slimeball & lawyer. He was given the option of making all the legal problems just go away by simply relinquishing his claim. Seems he was a bit hard to get ahold of for a while, eventually caving and the name was yet again free.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

Topics Topics
  1. A Question About C++ Programming Under Linux(7)
  2. How Do I Switch From Gnome To Kde?(6)
  3. Dreamweaver On Linux(15)
  4. What Is Mysql's Default Root Password?(8)
  5. What Linux Distro Do You Use ?(63)
  6. How to setup DNS server in Linux Slackware(4)
  7. Linux Question: Amarok And File Permissions(4)
  8. Pros And Cons Of Mac, Windows, And Linux(33)
  9. Is There A Linux Distro With Widescreen Support?(7)
  10. Ubuntu Linux As Free Operating System Alternative(47)
  11. What Made You Switch To Linux?(38)
  12. If Mac Osx Is Best With Hardware, Where Does Linux Lie?(5)
  13. Linux And Win Xp(7)
  14. Need Help With Linux Installation(5)
  15. Linux Rpg?(3)
  1. Is It Possible To Run Asp Under Linux(0)
  2. Network Install Linux On Laptop With No Cd Drive?(6)
  3. Linux Games(0)
  4. Help With Linux - Russix(4)
  5. Flash Wmode(transparent) Pramater In Firefox3(on Linux) - Not Working(1)
  6. Amazed By Linux(3)
  7. Linux Version 8.04 Out(5)
  8. Asp.net Hosting On Linux Servers?(1)
  9. Lan Surfer In Linux(2)
  10. Installing Php Pear On Linux(0)
  11. Trade Mark Infringrements And Issues..(5)
  12. Can Anyone Recommend A Light Linux Distro?(9)
  13. Wireless Lan Network Card Driver Installation On Linux Ubuntu 8.04!(0)


 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 30th August 2008 - 09:09 AM