|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Mar 19 2008, 03:24 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 58 Joined: 18-March 08 From: india Member No.: 59,502 |
This would really be very strange as i will tell you the truth all about the spread about AIDS through syrenge.
Friends, Actually posibily of tranfer of AIDs virus through need is very less or just a chance factor in one in a million. Thsi is coz as i am a biologist i know What hapens to the virus when it comes out of human body. The virus cannot servive, hence it go into stage where it committs sucide.. This is a molecular biology ascept which you can understand only if u go deep into the subject. Hence if a needle is pricked and then it is injected into an another person all of the sudden with in 2 seconds or so only then there would be the chace of infection. And suppose that happents too there will not be any problem and that person will not get aids because the entry of virus from that needle will only be a very negligible quantity and that would be straight cleaned away form out defence mechanism present in our body called as immuno defence. Hence there is a very very litle change that person pricked by need get aids. plz be aware of this and spread the teuth even to your friends. Thank you |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2008, 10:36 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Premium Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 189 Joined: 1-February 08 Member No.: 57,183 |
your a biologist but not a so called virologist. biologist only study the functions,mechanisms and,factors of the body. i know you also touch some mechanism of disease but you cannot say that spread of aids is minimal through needles.
aids are spread through bodily fluids. aids attack t4 helper cells that help so called immuno defenses what to attack. not sure about this one but if its that easy then why is it spreading in a rapid rate? if your so sure that the spread is minimal then try it for yourself and let's wait 6 months to see your lab result i am a so called medical technologist in some countries. |
|
|
|
Mar 19 2008, 11:29 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 341 Joined: 27-April 07 From: Texas! Member No.: 42,252 ![]() |
Well, I can say that if you're going to typ lyk dis then I won't want to take you seriously on your post. If you really are a biologist, then type like a biologist, use proper grammer like a biologist, and spell things correctly.
Anyway, now that I have chewed you out, lets take a look at your topic. If transfer of the AIDS virus through use of a needle or syrenge is the second leading cause of the transfer of the HIV virus (you don't catch AIDS like you would another virus, it's just the most advanced form of it) then obviously there is a greater chance then one in a million. While yes, a virus cannot survive a long time outside of an organism, it wouldn't take just two seconds after the removal of the needle for the virus to die. And I'm not totally sure, but I think that some viruses go into a dormant stage when outside of the body. . . not so sure on that one. . . I should do a little more reading. . . Anyway, here are some facts about AIDS: How you can get the virus that causes AIDS:
Sharing of needles from syrenges that could have possibly held drugs. Having yourself be deeply punctured-or stabbed- with a piece of HIV infected equipment (such as a knife) Or if you got a blood transfusion in the 80's You cannot get AIDS from kissing or contacting someone (i.e. sharing a drink or shaking a hand or hugging someone-even sharing the seat on a public toilet.) And AIDS itself doesn't kill you. It's the infections that you get when you have the virus that kill you. So yes, you can and probibly will get the HIV virus through sharing of an infected needle. So kids, don't do drugs Sources: Teenwire.com |
|
|
|
Mar 24 2008, 07:18 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 33 Joined: 23-March 08 From: Western USA Member No.: 59,735 |
Well, there are needles and then there are needles.....
The statistical risk in health care workers from a freshly contaminated needle, with blood from a know HIV positive person is 0.3%. That is 3 in a thousand sticks with a known positive fresh needle. That isn't Lotto kind of odds, but not as high as one might think. If you consider risk from discarded needles in alleys, playgrounds, or abandoned houses, the risk is essentially zero. There has never been a recorded case of HIV conversion from that type of exposure. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 16th May 2008 - 06:35 PM |