Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register)



2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The Megapixel Myth
dhruvagupta
post Dec 15 2007, 11:26 AM
Post #1


Newbie [Level 1]
*

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 14-December 07
From: India
Member No.: 54,749



QUOTE
<quote>So how many times have we all gone out to buy a digi cam based on the mega pixel criteria??
Then why does a 7.2 MP camera from Tech Com costs Rs7000 while from Sony the same thing costs above 15K.
So now its time to look deeper into what actually determines the photo quality of your digital camera.It's a sensor which is of two types
1-CCD sensor
2-CMOS sensor
Mega pixels only determine how much will you be able to scale your images.

Now coming to the sensors.
CCD sensors are expensive but the photo quality over CMOS is passable.
CMOS sensors are cheaper,require less battery power but actually the photo quality b/w CMOS and CCD sensors is just not comparable.All mobiles come up with only CMOS sensor cameras


SO now u probably know why a 5 MP camera from SONY costs more. :-)
</quote>

Source-www.tecktalk.blogspot.com
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
bhavesh
post Dec 16 2007, 07:07 AM
Post #2


Privileged Member
*********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 537
Joined: 21-August 06
From: Ziya's Heart
Member No.: 28,693



CCD (Charge Coupled Device) and CMOS (Complementary Metal Oxide Semiconductor) both sensors are used to convert light into voltages. But there is a basic difference between the two.

In CMOS a circuit is incorporated in the pixels itself to change the image to digital form, thus the surface of the pixel is not fully utilized to capture image, compromising with the image quality but size is small and thats why used in mobiles.

In CCD the whole surface is used to capture image and the analog output of these pixels are then changed into digital form by an extra circuitry. Thus resulting in bulkier size but with superb image quality.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
heavensounds
post Dec 16 2007, 09:45 AM
Post #3


Super Member
*********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 496
Joined: 15-March 05
Member No.: 4,538



That is very interesting to know, because I always kind of new that those cameras on mobile phones just cannotbe as good as normal ones, but I didn't know exactly why.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
FLaKes
post Dec 16 2007, 10:58 AM
Post #4


Trap Grand Marshal Member
***********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,134
Joined: 19-May 05
From: Mexico
Member No.: 7,234



I always thought that the more megapixels and the name of the brand the better, but I wouldnt buy a camera anyways, I dont take much pictures. I am doing alright with the camera that came in my phone, I might upgrade to a cybershot cellphone in a couple of months. That way I can have an mp3 player, a camera and a phone all in one. Because I would really hate to carry a camera and an ipod and a phone... to much space!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
dhruvagupta
post Dec 17 2007, 09:24 AM
Post #5


Newbie [Level 1]
*

Group: Members
Posts: 23
Joined: 14-December 07
From: India
Member No.: 54,749



U see if u want A4 size print a 3 MEGA PIXEL camera would do u a world of good.with CCD sensor though...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hitmanblood
post Dec 17 2007, 11:17 PM
Post #6


Privileged Member
*********

Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 775
Joined: 13-April 07
From: mreža
Member No.: 41,558



Yes but it also influences that is influenced by some other criterias such as. Whether or not you have some software or ebtter to say firmware that will control stillness of picture and so on. Because on high resolutions some pictures might not look smooth and it will be distracted biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ozzi
post Jan 8 2008, 04:05 AM
Post #7


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 8-January 08
Member No.: 55,913



I think megapixels are just for the size of the image, I'm happier with a cheaper samsung 5mp camera than with a sony 7.2 mp but expensive smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
flood
post Jan 15 2008, 01:50 PM
Post #8


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 3
Joined: 15-January 08
Member No.: 56,290



I always wondered about this. Thank You for confirming my suspicions. Although I am no camera expert I know that
the camera lense also affects the quality of the picture. Therefore the image can only be as good as the Lense. So using a basic lensed camera at 8MP is useless. While using perhaps a Schneider lense at 8MP will take a much better photo.

Alex
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
stardan
post Jan 19 2008, 06:07 PM
Post #9


Newbie [Level 1]
*

Group: Members
Posts: 10
Joined: 19-January 08
Member No.: 56,504



I have Sony W850 with 2MP and... this is fantastic! Super quality! As professional photo-camera....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
anachro