|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Apr 20 2005, 10:19 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 293 Joined: 14-August 04 Member No.: 808 |
QUOTE Google has sued Froogles.com, charging the rival shopping search engine with trademark infringement. Mountain View, Calif.-based Google, the No. 1 search engine, filed a 68-page complaint against Froogles.com in the Eastern District Court of New York. The complaint alleges that Froogles.com proprietor Richard Wolfe, a New York state resident, illegally traded on Google's famous name and search brand for profit with a "nearly identical" mark. "Upon information and belief, the defendant selected the mark Froogles with full knowledge of Google's prior rights in its Google name and mark," according to the filing. "As between the parties, Google is the senior user of marks that incorporate the formative--Oogle for Internet search services." Google asked the court to shut down its rival and order transfer of the domain name, among other relief. The case is only the latest legal showdown for Google, whose multibillion-dollar advertising and search business has become a wide target for complaints. The search giant faces several trademark infringement cases of its own, including complaints against its paid-search services in the United States and abroad. PC secrets The legal spat with Froogles.com goes back more than a year, when Wolfe filed a petition against approval for Google's trademark, Froogle, which was granted in February 2004. The search giant contends in the filing that its rival has instilled false doubt over Google's legal right to the shopping brand. The proprietor of Froogles.com registered the Web address in December 2000, according to the filing, but did not use the domain for business until July 2002. Google claims that this was four years after it had secured rights to its Google trademarks. Froogles.com registered for a trademark for e-commerce related marketing services in September 2003. For its part, Google filed a trademark application for Froogle in November 2002, and was granted the mark in February 2004. I new this would happen This post has been edited by snlildude87: Apr 20 2005, 10:32 PM |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 05:31 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
V-Man ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 370 Joined: 13-March 05 From: In live on Earth which is in the Milky Way which is in the Universe Member No.: 4,441 |
Google Sues Froogles Never knew there was a company named Froogles, Just checked the website out still running, But froogles did steal the name of Google so Google has allrights to sue Froogles. |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 05:47 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Proud to be hosted ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 992 Joined: 11-July 04 From: NL Member No.: 75 |
Uuhhh... I think froogles.com would be a lame name for a shopping site since the name is copied from google and froogle and froogle is some sort of shopping site too...
news.com doesnt sound very good about google |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 08:47 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member [Level 2] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 5-April 05 Member No.: 5,277 |
well, i hope google doesn't get too harsh on him, google is a very friendly service, we dont want to loose that. but yeah, froogle is lame
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 09:38 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Legend Killer ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 678 Joined: 15-April 05 From: Singapore Member No.: 5,697 |
It's actually gd that froogles get sue cause if its not bring down, many ppl will be mistaken and jump to the wrong company...
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 02:06 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Super Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 262 Joined: 2-October 04 Member No.: 1,393 |
Yeh, sueing is annoying but yeh they're just taking advantage of googles name so they can profit.
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 05:59 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 17-April 05 Member No.: 5,813 |
I am not sure but if you look at the dates, it looks like google stole froogles name to create froogle.
|
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 06:03 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 17-April 05 Member No.: 5,813 |
Just went to froogles.com and saw this:Bookmark froogles™ !
Also went to their forum and saw this:Froogles is in a battle with a Giant. A very large public corporation claimed that froogles was too similar to their trademark name. The National Arbitration Forum ruled in favor of froogles. Link to the decision Excerpt from the national arbitration forum's three judge panel decision: "The dissimilar letters in the domain name are sufficiently different to make it distinguishable from Google's mark," the panel found. The name Froogles.com "creates an entirely new word and conveys an entirely singular meaning from the mark." Although froogles has won the domain name dispute battle, we are still involved in a trademark dispute at the united states patent and trademark office. Now the large corporation has filed a case in federal court against froogles.com Our attorneys are working very hard and continue to work hard on this case. If you would like to show your support for the little guy, please read the articles below (or at least one of them) and post a reply to this message and tell others about this post. Some of the articles written about froogles.com in regards to our domain name/trademark infringement battle. http://www.searchenginejournal.com/index.php?p=1590 http://blog.searchenginewatch.com/blog/050415-183907 http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/modules.p...rticle&sid=1566 http://www.webpronews.com/news/ebusinessne...instGoogle.html http://msnbc.msn.com/id/5499354/ http://www.internetnews.com/article.php/3386401 http://www.kinetiqmedia.co.uk/archive.asp?ItemID=3108380 http://www.marketingvox.com/archives/2004/...ame_in_dispute/ http://www.okpatents.com/phosita/archives/...e_trademar.html http://www.cameron-hornbostel.com/whatsNew_d.asp?WNID=12 http://www.searchenginelowdown.com/2004/07...to-froogle.html |
|
|
|
Apr 21 2005, 06:06 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 12 Joined: 17-April 05 Member No.: 5,813 |
For sme reason I cannot edit the above post, sorry about all of the posting, here is the link to the forum page and decision http://www.froogles.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=8
http://www.froogles.com/NAFDecision.pdf |