|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Jun 13 2005, 08:03 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] ![]() Group: Members Posts: 17 Joined: 13-June 05 Member No.: 8,199 |
Konfabulator...Have you heard of it www.konfabulator.com great program that you can use to add stuff to your desktop to make it more exciting
ok yeah right it takes up so much resources its not funny but it is great if you like little things floating around your desktop! CHECK IT OUT |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2005, 08:21 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
POWERED BY LINUX! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 606 Joined: 11-July 04 From: Toronto, Canada Member No.: 78 |
Why do we need to pay for something if we can get it for free using SuperKaramba built for KDE 3.4 on all UNIX systems?
xboxrulz |
|
|
|
Jun 14 2005, 02:21 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 54 Joined: 14-June 05 Member No.: 8,208 |
Now, why would we use this "magic utility" if we have stardocks and winblinds and that kinda things for winxx, do we really need it? I have my interface to the windows 2000 look ( i love it because it doesn't steals my valuable RAM which I only have 256MB of ). As for KDE....KDE is a resource hog and I would rather go with a less ram-eating shell like fluxbox or gnome.
|
|
|
|
Jun 14 2005, 04:42 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
POWERED BY LINUX! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 606 Joined: 11-July 04 From: Toronto, Canada Member No.: 78 |
actually GNOME and KDE gobbles the exact same memory space.
It depends how much software you shove on the system. The difference between GNOME and KDE is their toolkit and look. KDE uses QT and GNOME uses GTK. xboxrulz |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topics | Topics | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 11th October 2008 - 12:01 AM |