 Intel® Cpu's, Info about Intel® CPU's |
|
|
|
|
  |
 Jan 14 2005, 02:23 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Neurotical Squirrel  Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 590 Joined: 4-November 04 From: Novi Sad, Vojvodina Member No.: 2,127  |
Here's some info about Intel processors, starting with it's first, 8086...
I generation (1970) - no cache, and no FPU unit - 8086, 8088, 80186, 80188 8086 - 16bit internall i externall communication 8088 - 16bit internall , 8bit externall communication - 8087 FPU, available as an upgrade II generation (1982) - no cache and no FPU unit - 80286 5x quicker execution than 1st generation processors Addressable memory expanded from 1 MB to 16 MB - 80287 optional FPU unit, added mathematical floating-point speedup III generation (1985) - first processor with cache - 80386SX, 80386DX Intel's first 32bit CPU 32bir data bus, 32bit memory bus 80386DX originaly 80386) - 32bit internal and external communication 80386SX - 32bit internal, 16bit external communication 16, 20, 25, 33 MHz L1 cache 8 KB - optional 80387 FPU unit *** *** IV generation (1989) *** - 486SX, 486DX, 486DX/2 full 32bit processor, builtin FPU unit 25 to 50 Mhz L1 cache 8Kb - 486DX/2 (1992) clock runs 2x faster than memory bus verions running on 20/50, 33/66 and 40/80 MHz - 486DX/4 (1994) clock is running 3x faster than memory bus L1 cache 16 KB running at 25/75, 33/100, 40/120 MHz This is just for now, coming up, Intel Pentium's... As soon as I translate it 
|
 |
 
|
|
Jan 27 2005, 04:31 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 324 Joined: 23-January 05 From: India Member No.: 3,388 |
where is P5 is there end of pentium series???/
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2005, 04:34 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] Group: Members Posts: 27 Joined: 26-January 05 Member No.: 3,444 |
i think that the p5 will be intels 64 bit processor thats non server based
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 27 2005, 04:51 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Core2Q-QX6800 Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 1,093 Joined: 3-August 04 From: Nigeria Member No.: 569 |
Well, I know that the pentium CPUs are very good one and I dont want there to be an end to it. For me, I think that the Pentium CPUs are better than their Celeron, AMD and the rest of them counterparts.
Intel only needs to make some nice upgrades and if there is going to be a P5.....well, that will be real nice. LOOKING FORWARD TO THAT...
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 1 2005, 02:28 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
delete me Group: Members Posts: 518 Joined: 18-September 04 From: delete me Member No.: 1,185 |
I think they really need to sit down, and redesign some of the parts of the CPU like AMD did with the original athlon. As a result their FPU unit is much better than the intel at the moment. Intel hasn't done ANYTHING groundbreaking since the introduction of the original Pentium and maybe moving the cache into the cpu with P3.
|
|
|
|
|
Feb 22 2005, 09:19 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 242 Joined: 20-February 05 From: Mangalore, India Member No.: 3,871 |
The is a little surprise for at least a few of you:
Intel P5 was released in 1993 (2 million transistors) Intel P6 was released in 1996 (3.2 million transistors) Doesn't anyone follow the server market??? 
|
|
|
|
|
May 26 2005, 04:06 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 10 Joined: 26-May 05 Member No.: 7,515 |
QUOTE(canute24 @ Feb 22 2005, 05:19 PM) The is a little surprise for at least a few of you: Intel P5 was released in 1993 (2 million transistors) Intel P6 was released in 1996 (3.2 million transistors) Doesn't anyone follow the server market???  very useful information for me i know more about it now thx anyway |
|
|
|
|
Jun 3 2005, 04:55 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] Group: Members Posts: 26 Joined: 14-May 05 Member No.: 7,033 |
I rekon intel are for business computer and amd are for gamers and overclocker.
I like amd a lot more than intel 
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2005, 08:56 PM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 6 Joined: 7-June 05 Member No.: 7,977 |
Yea defently AMD all the way!!!!!!!!! Altough i do think intels processors are more reliable for hard constant work |
|
|
|
|
