Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register)



4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> How We'll Get Back To The Moon, in 2018!!!!!
tdktank59
post Oct 27 2005, 04:04 AM
Post #1


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 400
Joined: 21-June 05
From: Callifornia
Member No.: 8,519



I found this artical on http://www.nasa.gov/missions/solarsystem/cev.html
I found it very interesting what Nasa and our goverment are doing as far as getting to the moon!!! and setting up a base out there for future missions to mars!!!

so have fun to view the picture go to the site above they are pretty cool if you ask me!!!

THey are reverting back to the old Apollo design spaceships and have implemented new features as you can read below...

Have fun

QUOTE(NASA)
How We'll Get Back to the Moon

09.22.05

Crew Exploration Vehicle Before the end of the next decade, NASA astronauts will again explore the surface of the moon. And this time, we're going to stay, building outposts and paving the way for eventual journeys to Mars and beyond. There are echoes of the iconic images of the past, but it won't be your grandfather's moon shot.

Image left: NASA's new crew exploration vehicle in lunar orbit. Click to enlarge. Artist's concept by John Frassanito and Associates.

This journey begins soon, with development of a new spaceship. Building on the best of Apollo and shuttle technology, NASA's creating a 21st century exploration system that will be affordable, reliable, versatile, and safe.

The centerpiece of this system is a new spacecraft designed to carry four astronauts to and from the moon, support up to six crewmembers on future missions to Mars, and deliver crew and supplies to the International Space Station.

The new crew vehicle will be shaped like an Apollo capsule, but it will be three times larger, allowing four astronauts to travel to the moon at a time.

LEARN MORE:
Explore with a slideshow, animation and 3-D models in our Flash Feature.
+ Full Resolution Images
+ Animation (25 Mb QuickTime)
+ Frequently Asked Questions
+ Fact Sheet (28 Kb PDF)
+ Presentation (5.9 Mb PDF)
+ September 19 Briefing (95 Kb PDF)
+ Exploration Systems Web site

Print Materials
Full Story: + 3.7 Mb PDF | + 197 Kb PDF
Lithographs:
Lunar Orbit: + 2.4 Mb PDF | + 156 Kb PDF
Launch Vehicles: + 1.3 Mb PDF | + 100 Kb PDF
The new spacecraft has solar panels to provide power, and both the capsule and the lunar lander use liquid methane in their engines. Why methane? NASA is thinking ahead, planning for a day when future astronauts can convert Martian atmospheric resources into methane fuel.

The new ship can be reused up to 10 times. After the craft parachutes to dry land (with a splashdown as a backup option), NASA can easily recover it, replace the heat shield and launch it again.

Coupled with the new lunar lander, the system sends twice as many astronauts to the surface as Apollo, and they can stay longer, with the initial missions lasting four to seven days. And while Apollo was limited to landings along the moon's equator, the new ship carries enough propellant to land anywhere on the moon's surface.

Once a lunar outpost is established, crews could remain on the lunar surface for up to six months. The spacecraft can also operate without a crew in lunar orbit, eliminating the need for one astronaut to stay behind while others explore the surface.

Safe and reliable

The launch system that will get the crew off the ground builds on powerful, reliable shuttle propulsion elements. Astronauts will launch on a rocket made up of a single shuttle solid rocket booster, with a second stage powered by a shuttle main engine.

New heavy lift and crew launch vehicles Image left: An engineering concept shows NASA's new heavy lift and crew launch vehicles. Click to enlarge. Credit: NASA
+ View Size Compared to Apollo, shuttle

A second, heavy-lift system uses a pair of longer solid rocket boosters and five shuttle main engines to put up to 125 metric tons in orbit -- about one and a half times the weight of a shuttle orbiter. This versatile system will be used to carry cargo and to put the components needed to go to the moon and Mars into orbit. The heavy-lift rocket can be modified to carry crew as well.

Best of all, these launch systems are 10 times safer than the shuttle because of an escape rocket on top of the capsule that can quickly blast the crew away if launch problems develop. There's also little chance of damage from launch vehicle debris, since the capsule sits on top of the rocket.

The Flight Plan

In just five years, the new ship will begin to ferry crew and supplies to the International Space Station. Plans call for as many as six trips to the outpost a year. In the meantime, robotic missions will lay the groundwork for lunar exploration. In 2018, humans will return to the moon. Here's how a mission would unfold:

A heavy-lift rocket blasts off, carrying a lunar lander and a "departure stage" needed to leave Earth's orbit (below left). The crew launches separately (below, center), then docks their capsule with the lander and departure stage and heads for the moon (below, right).

engineering graphics and artwork by John Frassanito and Associates depict a lunar flight plan.

Three days later, the crew goes into lunar orbit (below, left). The four astronauts climb into the lander, leaving the capsule to wait for them in orbit. After landing and exploring the surface for seven days, the crew blasts off in a portion of the lander (below, center), docks with the capsule and travels back to Earth. After a de-orbit burn, the service module is jettisoned, exposing the heat shield for the first time in the mission. The parachutes deploy, the heat shield is dropped and the capsule sets down on dry land (below, right).

engineering graphics and artwork by John Frassanito and Associates depict a lunar flight plan.

+ View More Detailed Graphic

'Into the Cosmos'

With a minimum of two lunar missions per year, momentum will build quickly toward a permanent outpost. Crews will stay longer and learn to exploit the moon's resources, while landers make one way trips to deliver cargo. Eventually, the new system could rotate crews to and from a lunar outpost every six months.

Planners are already looking at the lunar south pole as a candidate for an outpost because of concentrations of hydrogen thought to be in the form of water ice, and an abundance of sunlight to provide power.

New lunar lander Image right: Four astronauts could land on the moon in the new lander. Click to enlarge. Artist's concept by John Frassanito and Associates.

These plans give NASA a huge head start in getting to Mars. We will already have the heavy-lift system needed to get there, as well as a versatile crew capsule and propulsion systems that can make use of Martian resources. A lunar outpost just three days away from Earth will give us needed practice of "living off the land" away from our home planet, before making the longer trek to Mars.

As President Bush said when he announced the Vision for Space Exploration, "Humans are headed into the cosmos." Now we know how we'll get there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
s243a
post Oct 27 2005, 04:14 AM
Post #2


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 408
Joined: 7-December 04
From: Nova Scoita, Canada
Member No.: 2,604



I have been interested in space for quite some time and I was very happy when bush announced the vision for space exploration. For two long we have been flying in circles in LEO on a vehicle which is unsafe and hopelessly expensive. Finally NASA is given direction to use the money it gets to go forward and not in circles. I hope that future administrations continue this valiant effort to advance the technology that will allow us to survive in the hashes places and utilize resources in places that we have barley begun to set foot on.

It is interesting that the push back into space seems to coincide with a general shift in public concern towards preparing natural disasters both man made and of natural occurrence. By developing engineering survive and prosper in the most extreme places will go along way towards helping prepare humankind for whatever the future might entail.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tdktank59
post Oct 27 2005, 04:50 AM
Post #3


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 400
Joined: 21-June 05
From: Callifornia
Member No.: 8,519



QUOTE(s243a @ Oct 26 2005, 08:14 PM)
I have been interested in space for quite some time and I was very happy when bush announced the vision for space exploration. For two long we have been flying in circles in LEO on a vehicle which is unsafe and hopelessly expensive. Finally NASA is given direction to use the money it gets to go forward and not in circles. I hope that future administrations continue this valiant effort to advance the technology that will allow us to survive in the hashes places and utilize resources in places that we have barley begun to set foot on.

It is interesting that the push back into space seems to coincide with a general shift in public concern towards preparing natural disasters both man made and of natural occurrence. By developing engineering survive and prosper in the most extreme places will go along way towards helping prepare humankind for whatever the future might entail.
*




very nice lol... lost myself in your wording tho but exelent!!! im glad to see im not the only one...

Just as soonas we can start living in space and start colonizing elsewhere this will work out great!!!!

who knows this may end up being one of those Hitch Hiker Guide's things lol where the rest of the universe is so far beyond our point in technology and that we are all a big *arse* computer program lol...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
s243a
post Oct 27 2005, 06:39 AM
Post #4


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 408
Joined: 7-December 04
From: Nova Scoita, Canada
Member No.: 2,604



QUOTE(tdktank59 @ Oct 26 2005, 11:50 PM)
very nice lol... lost myself in your wording tho but exelent!!! im glad to see im not the only one...

Just as soonas we can start living in space and start colonizing elsewhere this will work out great!!!!

who knows this may end up being one of those Hitch Hiker Guide's things lol where the rest of the universe is so far beyond our point in technology and that we are all a big *arse* computer program lol...
*


I don’t expect to come across aliens any time soon considering the vast distance of space and the extreme amounts of energy necessary to create a warp drive. Getting back to the current situation you might find the following interview interesting:
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=18122
Also there are many people interested in space, many advocacy groups and many discussion groups. My favorite advocacy group for space is the mars society.
http://www.marssociety.org/
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
tuddy
post Oct 27 2005, 11:45 AM
Post #5


Privileged Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 570
Joined: 5-July 05
From: Ballarat
Member No.: 9,042



Whats so good about the Moon? ... Its a big piece of Rock that has nothing on it. I mean you can walk on there and leave a footprint forever, get over it.

Earth is where we were born, earth has computers, money, water, food, females/males. so who cares?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sangdukseo
post Oct 27 2005, 07:12 PM
Post #6


Member [Level 3]
******

Group: Members
Posts: 97
Joined: 16-June 05
Member No.: 8,302



The moon's gonna be reached by either China or a private venture. The government is not effiecient enough to put a big project like this together before someone else does, most likely a private business. And for tuddy, space exploration has practical benefits, not just the "It's man's destiny" bs. If earth's environment begins to deteriote at an accelerated pace due to human actions, we may be forced to go find a new place to live. Gotta think big man.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
wild20
post Oct 27 2005, 08:02 PM
Post #7


Never alone with Christ
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 647
Joined: 22-July 05
Member No.: 9,713



This is awesome. They were going for mars in the year 2018 though. I wonder why they changed it? Oh well. The mission will be great. Never have we set up a colony on any planet before besides ours. The moon will definitely be a good starter goal.

I seriously believe that if we don't plan very carefully for the mars trip though, that we will lose the lives of every one on board. Why? The mission to mars will require a long journey just to get to mars, then we have to get them back. If anything goes wrong, you will be in a time where you will have thirty minute intervals between talking, due to the long range between us and them. If communication fails, then what do you do? We must be careful and unhurried. Remeber apollo thirteen?, and the accident that happened while preparing for the mission? It was all in a hurry. So while this is a good idea, we need to be careful too.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ryo
post Oct 27 2005, 08:30 PM
Post #8


Super Member
*********

Group: Members
Posts: 264
Joined: 31-March 05
Member No.: 5,056



ive posted another topic of how much i hate the space shuttle design and the appolo design isnt much better. We should be working toward a new type of propulsion that will quickly and effictivally work form the air to space with no rockets. I think these new age missions to the moon will be cool i really want to visit the moon someday that would be real cool.