Most world leaders are afraid of hurting the feelings of any extremist religion.

Because of 9/11.

Have you ever had a dog? Do you know the differance between a dog which you let do whatever it want and a dog which you teach that you're the #1 strongest alpha dominant leader?

The dog which you don't disipline will disrespect you and it'll think it's the boss in the house while the dog you dicipline will respect you.

Now, if a countryindividual person today insults.. Islam, for example, the extremists of that religion will become furious and there will be protests etc etc you know the proceedure.

It's at this point I think we go the wrong way; What we do is blame the country in question for not censoring the person/newspaper that posted the incredibly humorousoffensive cartoons. We give THEM critique when...

What we should do is:

1. "grow a couple" and
2. instead of supporting the terrorists and saying that it's wrong to offend people the leader would call the extremist leaders on the phone and tell them something along the lines of <<REMOVED>>. This would teach them that they can't mess with todays nuclear superpowers. And of they mess with them, boom! instantly. MuHaha let's see you bi*ch now!

Or maybe thats the solution? Nukes instantly?

A couple of small nukes, blowing up well selected regions of the torabora mountains..?



please note that this is not a anti-islam post I do not think more or less about any religion in the world.

Yeah... I don't know what cave you were raised in, but last time I checked nuclear explosions not only affect those in their immediate vicinity including every biological thing, you know, cats, dogs, horses, snakes, spiders... EVERYTHING, but everything down wind all the way across the planet, including YOU and ME. Wake up man! Start thinking critically! You're completely wasting your meager brain power thinking up garbage that CAN'T happen without giving us all CANCER! And how is it ever right to kill innocents anyway? I suppose next you'll be telling us fictional characters like Jack Bower are GOOD. Go spew your ignorance elsewhere. Or grow a pair.... of brain cells.

Radiation, ecological and terrain damage aside genocide is a punishable crime even in war. You can't just kill people because you disagree with them or in this case because they are agressive towards you. This holy war is fought by extremists who take the teachings of their own people too far. It happened in a different form with the Christians during the Crusades, but nonetheless it happened. The true way to defeat such a regime of unjust acition and ill-conceived action is knowledge; lift the veil of ignorance and work towards understanding.

I bring up a well known quote, "One man's terrorist is another mans freedom fighter" So by definition



You would be a terrorist.

The truth of the matter is anyone who spreads terror is a terrorist, Bush, Blair, the UN are all terrorists really. Bush and Blair bring the worst of the three. I think the only way to rid the planet of terrorists is to rid the planet of humans.

Who is Jack Bower? I'm sorry but I can't see all your awesome glorious American TV shows (I'm going out on a limb here and assuming it's a TVshow you're talking about) here on the other side of the atlantic ocean, so I really don't know who you're talking about.

btw,
How many braincells do I need to grow and add to my current pool in order to understand humor and sarcasm on the internet?



Genocide? When did religious fanatics become a separate part of the human race?

Are we now categorised into whites, blacks, asians, extremists, etc etc?

Man, this gets me, it really does.Go ahead and name me one war that wouldn't have happened unless people "disagreed" with eachother.



So by definition, the Dalai Lama is a terrorist? How about mother Theresa? Jesus?

Now, I don't know what the "Middle East envoy" is but I'm having a hard time understanding how Tony could use it to advance his "reign of terror".

This post has been edited by komigen: Oct 2 2007, 09:29 PM

What frustrates me is that no one is willing to actually do anything that would end the whole issue of this "war on terror" that we have.

Realistically-speaking, the terrorists are, well, ourselves.

Think about how many people are still rather skeptical about taking planes to destinations because of 9/11.

Think about how many people are probably a bit shaky about the state of our road bridges after Minnesota.

Think about how many people are afraid to feed their pets, let children have toys, or even eat certain foods after China's whole ordeal with releasing tainted products out of the country.

I believe there was even a fear of peanut butter at one point, tainted with salmonella.

People are friggin' retarded. We're like sheep, swayed by the exposure of media. We dress and act like MTV, believe every little bit of the news on CNN, FOX, or what-have-you. Conspirators are out there, spreading the many possibilities of what happened on 9/11 (the "truth"), not to mention their political propoganda in between the lines. Peers, friends, and even family constantly keep each other brainwashed and limiting open thought by barraging what they learn from these sources onto each other. There aren't a lot of free thinkers out there anymore.

Once we start learning that we are in control of our own lives and shouldn't fret over every friggin' thing out there BECAUSE the idiot box told us to, we'll be fine. As for the "war" in Iraq, we really need to throw in a massive operation to clean everything out, police the area, rebuild, then get the heck out and leave some posts there to try to keep the peace. Or just get the heck out and blow up anything considered unfriendly with controlled munitions and fuel-air bombs or something (anything non-nuclear), then settle in with a policing force.

But the politicians and idiots running the country are too afraid of ruining reputability and losing political influence with the use of weapons of that scale. Then again, why the hell do we even develop weapons like the MOAB if we aren't even going to use them?

(I'm sure there's more to it, but I'm not exactly in a position to make any calls, so I'll just leave this out there as a sort of rant.)

That's what almighty Google is for...


If you ask me, we hurt a lot more than their feelings .

So when Afghanistan was taken over by the regime we said "You suck, what the hell dude" ? Tell me what you're basing that off of.


So if I called you up on the phone today and demanded that you couldn't go potty from now on, and if you did I would nuke you, you would listen?


Yes, I'm quite sure they have very sophisticated infrastructure up there, including mud huts and caves, just to name a few.

This post has been edited by dre: Oct 2 2007, 11:34 PM

Well, he was trying to insult me and because I didn't know what he was talking about the insult failed. And therefore I informed him about my ignorance of American television in order for him to be able to make a better attampt


What, besides their feelings, did the Danish cartoons actually hurt then?

Just an impression I got from watching the news everyday. Didin't claim it was a fact or that everyone does it.


I sure as hell would think twice about going though. And when I decide to test my luck and go anyway at least the neighbour next door sees what happens when your warnings are ignored.

This is however quite an unfair comparison you're making here. I need to go potty or I'll *BLEEP* my pants, terrorists will surely not *BLEEP* their pants just for avoiding blowing themselves up..


?