 Firefox 3 Alpha, FIREFOX 3 ALPHA |
|
|
|
|
  |
 Mar 28 2007, 02:16 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1]  Group: Members Posts: 19 Joined: 7-May 06 Member No.: 23,209  |
FIREFOX 3 ALPHA using new engine >>>>www.mozilla.org/projects/firefox/3.0a1/releasenotes/
GRAN PARADISO !!! are this new code will be bring a more security ??? |
 |
 
|
|
Mar 28 2007, 02:48 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing.  Group: [MODERATOR] Posts: 3,882 Joined: 24-July 05 From: In Trouble Again... still? Member No.: 9,787  |
Yes. We have been aware of it for some time now, thanks to this posting from Buffalohelp.
http://www.trap17.com/forums/index.php?s=&...st&p=303099 There is a download link in that Posting. But be careful installing it because it will replace your Firefox 2 profile. Be prepared to re-install Firefox 2 if you install Firefox 3 Alpha (codename: Minefield). And as per the posting above, Firefox 3 meets the WASP (Website Accessibility Standards Program) Standards required to comply with their "Acid Test" which measures the Browser's compliance to the w3c Standards. Only Safari on the Mac and Konquerer on Linux does that to date. |
|
|
|
|
May 20 2007, 12:55 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 21 Joined: 17-March 07 Member No.: 40,207 |
QUOTE(jlhaslip @ Mar 28 2007, 03:48 PM)  Yes. We have been aware of it for some time now, thanks to this posting from Buffalohelp. http://www.trap17.com/forums/index.php?s=&...st&p=303099 There is a download link in that Posting. But be careful installing it because it will replace your Firefox 2 profile. Be prepared to re-install Firefox 2 if you install Firefox 3 Alpha (codename: Minefield). And as per the posting above, Firefox 3 meets the WASP (Website Accessibility Standards Program) Standards required to comply with their "Acid Test" which measures the Browser's compliance to the w3c Standards. Only Safari on the Mac and Konquerer on Linux does that to date. I do think this is one to watch, but for right internet uses i would stick to FF2 untill they have a fully working FF3 as it still seems to cash windows into DSOD. |
|
|
|
|
May 20 2007, 01:18 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Privileged Member Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 537 Joined: 21-August 06 From: Ziya's Heart Member No.: 28,693 |
There might be some loop holes in Firefox 3 so its better to wait for the full version to come. Till than I will use Firefox 2, thanx for the link.
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2007, 11:32 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 27-May 07 Member No.: 43,729 |
i agree with bhavesh,anarchy firefox 3 alpha is very unstable, and there is very few mods or themes which supports it
just wait for the stable version, or maybe beta version |
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2007, 08:05 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 22 Joined: 6-June 07 From: Indiana, USA Member No.: 44,306 |
I think I'll hold off on FF3, at least til Beta, like others have said. Thanks, though. I didn't realize they were coming out with a FF3 so soon!
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 6 2007, 10:24 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,308 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218  |
Well they have made claims thats Firefox 3 is going to be the second browser to pass the Acid test, I tried out the early release and it was ok, I couldn't really tell the difference between Fire fox 2 and 3 except that firefox 2 plug ins didn't work. If I remember correctly they plan to release the final version in either late 2007 or early 2008, so it should be interesting how many people have converted their plug ins for that browser already.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 12:32 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
"Betsuni" Group: Members Posts: 1,023 Joined: 9-April 05 From: Japan Member No.: 5,445 |
That's great news! At home I usually use Firefox and I'm excited to hear about the new release. I'm sure there are a few bugs to be worked out, so I'll wait until either the final version - or maybe even a release candidate version - is released before I download it.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 02:29 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Privileged Member Group: Members Posts: 628 Joined: 20-May 06 Member No.: 23,968 |
Certainly it's going to be promising if it has better CSS 3 support and JPEG 2000 support. The more web technologies the better.
|
|
|
|
|