 Female Warrior Wallpaper |
Free Web Hosting, No Ads > Xisto Network Sites > The GFXTrap Forum - Trap17 Graphics Site > Other > 3D/Large Pieces|
|
|
|
  |
 Aug 21 2007, 12:21 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3  Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,308 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218   |
Here is my latest wallpaper, but this time I don't think the brushing goes well with it, the coloring is perfect, just not the brushing.
|
 |
 
|
|
Aug 21 2007, 02:39 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 26-January 06 From: New Durham, NH Member No.: 17,651 |
It could use some adjustment to contrast, but looks pretty good.
Did you do this yourself? If so, Photoshop? Custom brush? (Nice lens flare.) 
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2007, 10:47 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,308 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 |
Interesting your the first to bring up changes, which is good, although a bit surprise in what needed to be changed and. If I am thinking what your thinking then nope I didn't use a contrast layer, just an old fashion layer property. and yes I did do you it, and I used Photoshop CS3 and used vector brushes for it.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 21 2007, 03:57 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 258 Joined: 14-October 06 From: on da moon Member No.: 31,632 |
I like the woman better than the background
 Wats the difference between CS3 and CS2? |
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2007, 12:09 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 26-January 06 From: New Durham, NH Member No.: 17,651 |
QUOTE(mojoman @ Aug 21 2007, 11:57 AM)  I like the woman better than the background Wats the difference between CS3 and CS2? Nothing, really. CS3 fully integrates itself into the suite so that you can use it more easily with everything in the CS3 package (like Flash, Fireworks, etc.). However, it kills ImageReady, so you have to use Fireworks if you want any animations done. (Photoshop will open up animated GIFs, but only show the first frame for you to edit.) I'm not so sure on features. So far, it's not worth the upgrade, IMO. |
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2007, 12:33 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,308 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 |
Correction ImageReady is there Adobe was smart and got rid of the software package for it since you can use the same tools to design them. All you do is open up the animation window and away you go in creating animations. As for features nothing has changed except for how the menu's look, and the fact you can work with 3-D graphics such as CAD, Bryce stuff like that.
|
|
|
|
|
Aug 22 2007, 02:51 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 439 Joined: 26-January 06 From: New Durham, NH Member No.: 17,651 |
QUOTE(Saint_Michael @ Aug 21 2007, 08:33 PM) Correction ImageReady is there Adobe was smart and got rid of the software package for it since you can use the same tools to design them. All you do is open up the animation window and away you go in creating animations. As for features nothing has changed except for how the menu's look, and the fact you can work with 3-D graphics such as CAD, Bryce stuff like that. Thanks for the correction. I think I just noticed that they didn't have ImageReady on the side, so I figured they got rid of it. That and I was too lazy to look.  Why would they have Bridge, Device Central, Stock Photos, and all this other crap that sits outside of the program instead of being integrated also? Then again, PSCS3 takes a while to load already unless it's in cache... |
|
|
|
|
Similar Topics
|