|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Apr 18 2006, 09:11 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,295 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 ![]() |
Heres my latest sig enjoy
![]() redone
|
|
|
|
Apr 20 2006, 11:16 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Member [Level 2] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 75 Joined: 15-April 06 Member No.: 21,894 |
the 1st one is crap 2nd one really nice love it cool sig
|
|
|
|
May 12 2006, 01:42 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,295 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 ![]() |
thats your opinion, but yet again itsin the ey of the beholder on who thinks it looks good.
|
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 11:27 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Member [Level 2] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 84 Joined: 5-May 06 Member No.: 23,107 |
First one isnt to my taste either the second one is much better although i'm not keen on the background but a very nice sig anyway
|
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 01:29 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Advanced Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 114 Joined: 14-July 05 From: Minnesota, USA Member No.: 9,407 |
I'm not a fan of the first one either, the background is fine and all, I just don't like how the render is blended in.
The second one is pretty nice, although not one of your best(duh), still a good sig. First: 6/10 Second: 8/10 This post has been edited by SarCasM: May 14 2006, 01:30 PM |
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 01:50 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Privileged Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 659 Joined: 16-April 06 From: Texas Member No.: 21,945 |
i definately like the redone version looks alot better and the fact that the blurryness smudging is gone makes it look alot better as well
|
|
|
|
May 14 2006, 01:57 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 51 Joined: 14-May 06 Member No.: 23,615 |
I really like the 2nd one the Redone Version Its much better than the first one
ill rate it 9/10 |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th July 2008 - 05:39 PM |