|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Jan 22 2006, 11:44 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 68 Joined: 30-July 05 Member No.: 10,043 |
A few days back there was a news about evidence of bigfoot in kerala,it is a state in India. The scientists there believed that it is the best evidence found.
A bigfoot if you do not know about it is a kind of creature that is several feet larger than humans, may be a step in evolution of mankind. Several videos about this animal have been taken, But the best one was by two friends. But now that video also have been declared fake, the video owner himself said that it is fake. Anyway about the one found in keral, QUOTE Giant footprints found at Karalmanna, a hilly village in Kerala's Palakkad District, are now being projected by anthropologists as belonging to *person* sapiens that lived in the area about 30, 000 years ago. According to the team of anthropologists headed by Krishna Swamy the footprints which are two feet six inches in length, belonged to a giant human being weighing about 400 kilograms and having a heigh of about 17 feet. "There are footprints on the rock, both small and big. All these footprints are in the shape of human feet but bigger in size, said Chandran, an awed local resident. Krishna Swamy,says the height of the cave in which the giant creature lived was 50 meters, and the creature must have used it to harbour animals that it killed for survival. "The big footprints are similar to the footprints found in Australia and Texas in the United States. It is believed to be of a giant of 8 to 9 feet tall and around 360 kilograms in weight. we have found a particular site where there was a huge footprint of 2.6 feet in length. According to the length it is believed to be of around 400 kilograms in weight and 17 feet in height. The particular big footed creature about which we are speaking had arranged a set up inside the rock shelter to watch the movements of other animals. It must be a carnivorous, no doubt, Swamy said. According to the evidence available, the creature must have lived around 30,000 years ago. "We have found water, a river and valleys around the cave. According tothe evidence it must have lived around 30, 000 years ago, Krishna Swamy added. The site is believed to have many items of geological and anthropological importance. Well there are also people that say it is not true the foot prints are not real they may have been formed by rock erossion. And i my self also think why there is only one foot print, why not many Ok Bye, please make some comments i am very much interested in this topic. This post has been edited by serverph: Jan 22 2006, 05:04 PM |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2006, 11:59 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Privileged Member ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 702 Joined: 17-February 05 Member No.: 3,817 |
Yes, there was news regarding this big foot man. I saw the picture in Times of India epaper some days ago. The titled goes something like this, 'King Kong in Kerala, India'.
This is one of the most interesting pieces that has been in the news recently. If you can provide us the source of your news and link to the article itself it will be good. The article also appeared in many online sites. One of them is Zeenews. The link is here : Click here. The Times of India source is also up here : Click here From now on please always indicate the source of your news, including the link to the article concerned. Search google, its always easy to get something like this. |
|
|
|
Jan 22 2006, 05:41 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Never alone with Christ ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 647 Joined: 22-July 05 Member No.: 9,713 |
Yes, there have been many sightings of these creatures. Whether they are real or not, who knows. The evidence is very compelling, but there are SO many hoaxes out there, it is hard to tell. One thing that is of interest is the scientific studies though. Where they actually set up camera's and seemingly "find" Bigfoot. But never really get close enough to make out more than a big figure walking through the forest.
I think that Bigfoot is really just a hoax, aside from a family story, all others could be stories told to carry on the possibility of a creature gapping the bridge to evolution. Which is also a big hoax. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topics | Topics | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th July 2008 - 07:11 AM |