 Amd Verses Intel, which do you prefer? |
Rating
|
|
|
|
|
  |
 Jul 28 2004, 11:14 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Member [Level 1]  Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 27-July 04 Member No.: 216  |
Which company u like better?
rite now AMD has the edge over intel with there 64 and FX series... |
 |
 
|
|
Jul 28 2004, 11:20 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 122 Joined: 27-July 04 From: U.S. Member No.: 217 |
But there arent really any 64-bit bit apps right now. I like Intel better, I have a P4 Northwood 3Ghz.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 28 2004, 11:27 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 472 Joined: 25-July 04 Member No.: 206 |
intel is the best and will be the best
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2004, 02:09 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] Group: Members Posts: 34 Joined: 25-July 04 Member No.: 203 |
The Winner is AMD.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2004, 02:37 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 27-July 04 Member No.: 216 |
Yea AMD is better, intel has no plans of making household 64 bit processors in the near future, they are only making 64 bits for buisness use...
AMD has the throne now, but they didnt before their 64 bits 
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 30 2004, 02:52 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
POWERED BY LINUX! Group: Members Posts: 607 Joined: 11-July 04 From: Toronto, Canada Member No.: 78 |
I love AMD for their price and for its speed.
FACTS: AMD Athlon XP was rated to be for gaming Intel Pentium 4 was rated for office use or for developers |
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2004, 01:21 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Member [Level 1] Group: Members Posts: 61 Joined: 27-July 04 Member No.: 216 |
i disagree, pentium 4's are much better than amd xps, p4s are powerfuller (lol) than xp's in almost all aspects, so how is athlons meant for gaming?
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2004, 01:27 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Advanced Member Group: Members Posts: 122 Joined: 27-July 04 From: U.S. Member No.: 217 |
The two things that intel are better at is their memory cache and the clock speed.
|
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2004, 02:03 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Super Member Group: Members Posts: 424 Joined: 13-July 04 Member No.: 87 |
I think there was a thread aobut this issue some time ago.
Anyway, AMD's 64 aren't really doing any good because it does not have any supporting programs or specific OSs they can work with. Of course, the 64 is way more powerful, but as I said, there are not much programs in the world that can tap its full potential. On the other hand, Intel's new processors are very expensive but it pays because of its stability. Talking aobut stsbility, I use a AMD Athlon xp 1800+ but I do not experience stability issues. The only thing that irritates me is the noise from the CPU fan. My school's computers use Intel processors and I can hardly hear their noise. So from my guess, its probably that AMD cpus produce either more heat, or maybe their coolers jsut can't match Intel. This conclusion isn't really all fair because I don't have the exact speeds of the school com's CPU and so forth, but this can show some info.(if you can pick up what i mean..) That's probably why AMD is for gaming and Intel is from devloptment/business. -Shackman |
|
|
|
|
Jul 31 2004, 02:08 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Newbie Group: Members Posts: 8 Joined: 31-July 04 Member No.: 323 |
 intel will always have the #1 spot.
|