|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Jun 29 2007, 06:45 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 3 Joined: 28-April 07 Member No.: 42,340 |
![]() Well it isn't my best sig but I like it (I love abstracts). Hope you like it ! |
|
|
|
Jun 29 2007, 09:41 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Master of All Typos ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 621 Joined: 30-July 06 From: Earth, Usa, Maine, Waterford, Member No.: 27,507 ![]() |
|
|
|
|
Jul 8 2007, 08:20 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Newbie [Level 2] ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 30 Joined: 7-July 07 Member No.: 46,096 |
Hey great job mate. Renders dont look great in abstract images but thats a great on there mate. I would rate it a 9.3/10
Nice work, Shaistav |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 07:06 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Newbie ![]() Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 18-August 07 Member No.: 48,406 |
I actually quite like the fact that there is no render, I think the basic foundation of sigs has become far too generic. It's good to see something a little different, I like the way you emphasized the abstract (C4?) in the background, rather than emphasizing a render.
Great job. |
|
|
|
Aug 19 2007, 10:40 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
$p4m 0n j00 $h4m3 m3 0nc3 $p4m 0n m3 $h4m3 m3 7\/\/1c3 ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED] Posts: 6,795 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 ![]() myCENT:READY[145.10] |
not bad, text a bit on the hard side to see, but Shaistav is correct when your doing something like or using C4D renders to designs sigs you rarely want to use a render unless you go into some detail blending.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2008 - 12:28 PM |