|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 65 Joined: 7-March 05 Member No.: 4,229 |
|
![]() Group: Members
Posts: 18 Joined: 10-March 05 Member No.: 4,354 |
|
![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 36 Joined: 1-March 05 From: Portugal Member No.: 4,075 |
Post
#3
Mar 10 2005, 10:11 PM
QUOTE(mpodner @ Mar 10 2005, 02:53 PM) What do you know about Windwos XO codename Lognhorn. [right][snapback]58478[/snapback][/right] What is Longhorn? Find information on and related links for the next version of Windows, codenamed Longhorn. http://www.microsoft.com/windows/longhorn/default.mspx |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 590 Joined: 4-November 04 From: Novi Sad, Vojvodina Member No.: 2,127 |
Post
#4
Mar 11 2005, 01:35 AM
I first saw Longorn in october 2003, and it was pre-alpha release... Truth be told, I was very dissapointed with it. It was in NO way different than XP, except for some weird star where Windows logo now is, in Windows explorer and IE, and hiddious huge analog clock... I know it was a pre-alpha, but I expected a little more... something |
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 46 Joined: 10-March 05 Member No.: 4,343 |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#6
Mar 12 2005, 05:29 PM
I dun like Windows Longhorn, it's gonna be so pumped up that it requires a 2.6 GHZ minimum hardware and like 5 GB of storage space. For most of us, why should we shell out extra money on this proprietory crap? xboxrulz |
|
Guest_crakersiak_*
Guests
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 318 Joined: 5-January 05 Member No.: 3,136 |
Post
#8
Mar 13 2005, 03:01 PM
You can find many articles and screenshots of beta versions of Microsoft Windows codename Longhorn here: www.winsupersite.com Anyway, Microsoft said that it will focus on using the graphic card resources more than ever to make a very exciting and functional interface, so if you want to run Longhorn, you better have at least 32mb of video memory available. But I still hope that the final build of Longhorn will be able to run on slower machines... Not everybody has the money to buy a new PC every time a new Windows OS version comes along... |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 346 Joined: 8-February 05 Member No.: 3,660 |
Post
#9
Mar 13 2005, 03:06 PM
QUOTE(crakersiak @ Mar 13 2005, 09:49 PM) is ok longhorn [right][snapback]59406[/snapback][/right] Ok that is very close to a spam crakersiak, please post with a sentance with proper grammar... it should have been - "Longhorn is ok Anyways back to longhorn i have just looked at the screenshots on this website: http://www.activewin.com/screenshots/longhorn/ And from what i see it doesn't seem very different, i mean you can do most of that by customizing your windows desktop. but if they release a new windows i will probably go get it. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 84 Joined: 12-March 05 From: Canada Member No.: 4,413 |
Post
#10
Mar 13 2005, 04:02 PM
Windows Longhorn isn't ready to be released yet, as it need superior graphic cards just for the operation system. Also rumor has it that when it is released, both the new graphics card is out and the terabyte hard drive which optimizes it's performance. For those of you that don't know what a Terabyte Hard Drive is, a THD is 1024 gigabytes on just one drive. Plus it will most likely need the new celeron chips as they are faster. I know all this because i got the 4074 release and the graphics took up all my Virtual Memory. It mainly Windows XP with a better interface and graphics. The rumored realese date was this year. But Microsoft says that it wil most likely come out in 2007, hinting also when the terabyte hard drive will come out. |
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
4 | bluedragon | 599 | 27th June 2008 - 01:38 PM Last post by: rvalkass |
|||
![]() |
5 | Evil man | 2,151 | 23rd June 2007 - 06:34 PM Last post by: rize619 |
|||
![]() |
7 | jailbox | 650 | 6th September 2004 - 11:53 AM Last post by: synderoxide |
|||
![]() |
2 | dontmaimyourself | 674 | 2nd August 2004 - 08:55 AM Last post by: Spectre |
|||
![]() |
16 | pr3dr49 | 1,210 | 9th August 2004 - 06:39 PM Last post by: popac |
|||
![]() |
11 | stingray001 | 1,258 | 1st August 2006 - 04:46 PM Last post by: gaggu121 |
|||
![]() |
10 | zhangzy | 1,145 | 24th September 2004 - 01:58 PM Last post by: goranche |
|||
![]() |
5 | stevey | 478 | 20th August 2004 - 06:14 PM Last post by: Spectre |
|||
![]() |
14 | Thunder | 1,142 | 24th September 2004 - 01:25 AM Last post by: akz |
|||
![]() |
17 | dundun2007 | 1,604 | 20th October 2004 - 01:50 PM Last post by: jamesdm |
|||
![]() |
8 | tonyused | 664 | 23rd June 2006 - 04:38 PM Last post by: innocent-devil |
|||
![]() |
8 | winflowers | 341 | 27th September 2004 - 03:28 AM Last post by: Critical_Impact |
|||
![]() |
2 | stevey | 529 | 24th September 2004 - 12:30 AM Last post by: akz |
|||
![]() |
11 | Zenchi | 1,813 | 14th October 2004 - 12:04 PM Last post by: NTNguyen |
|||
![]() |
1 | farh1n | 4,349 | 11th August 2007 - 02:21 PM Last post by: odomike |
|||