|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,093 Joined: 3-August 04 From: Nigeria Member No.: 569 |
Post
#1
Oct 20 2007, 03:39 PM
I am at a situation now where by I am undecided whether continue using windows. I have always been a Windows Fan all my life until some months back when I started delving into the Linux world and wat I found in there was quite very impressing. When you talk about 3-D desktop environments and security and some real col stuffs like widgets and things like that, Linux has got it all. But for a few softwares, I would have said bye bye to windows months back. I need help here in making this decision. Is there any software in Linux that conviniently replace MS Encarta? or Encyclopaedia Britannica? And I also wanna know if there is a software out there that can replace Imesh (bearshare) under Linux. And then, my iLumina Bible is also another software that is stoping me from waving a goodbye to windows. Somebody help me please. Thanks for all your anticipated help in here. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 576 Joined: 26-January 06 From: New Durham, NH Member No.: 17,651 myCENT:63.96 |
Post
#2
Oct 20 2007, 03:52 PM
I'm not sure what it's called, but there is a feature in Linux that is similar to Add/Remove Programs that gives you a buttload of options for programs to install, which include most equivalents for Windows-only software. Also, for those programs that you absolutely have to have, you can always utilize the Windows environment emulators (Wine and Cadega, I believe). If the encyclopedia is all that you're wanting to keep, why not just go online? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,317 Joined: 11-January 06 From: Chennai, India Member No.: 16,932 myCENT:40.40 |
Post
#3
Oct 20 2007, 04:25 PM
I'd say one thing that never ever say that Linux is more secure. It seems to be more secure because it is not targeted by the Hackers and other malicious coders. And windows seems more insecure because it is the world's most attacked OS, so the hackers study windows to uncover the exploits in it, but no one is looking for such in Linux and other Linux based OSes. The famous Mac OS built on the BSD was supposed to be secure too, until when hackers easily managed to break into it. Do you now what those hackers said, even Windows XP would have be a lot more difficult to hack than the Mac OS. This was done and tested by real hackers. See no one has ever managed to port the Windows work on Power-PC platform, but they've managed to make Mac OS work on X86 platform, even before Apple shifted to use Intel processors to power their Macintosh machines. This doesn't mean that Windows is superior to Linux or Mac OS or any other OS, but it is not bad as others are. No human has ever created a software that is practically impossible to hack or crack or didn't have an exploit Linux has its own advantages, Windows has its own advantages and Mac OS has its own advantages. There best advantage of Linux is that being developed as open source, if one of the developers made a mistake or created a code that can be used to exploit the OS, then other developers would check it and correct the problems, this would be easier because there are several thousands of developers working on it, whereas in Windows this s not possible. I use both Windows and Linux, so don't think that I'm a MS guy a few links to learn more on this topic, http://www.newsfactor.com/perl/story/19649.html http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document...1,33941,00.html http://www.vnunet.com/vnunet/news/2117482/...ws-secure-linux This post has been edited by delivi: Oct 20 2007, 05:08 PM |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,084 Joined: 22-June 05 From: 127.0.0.1 — no place like it. Member No.: 8,528 myCENT:4.52 |
Post
#4
Oct 20 2007, 04:33 PM
QUOTE(odomike @ Oct 20 2007, 11:39 AM) [snapback]352214[/snapback] Is there any software in Linux that conviniently replace MS Encarta? or Encyclopaedia Britannica? And I also wanna know if there is a software out there that can replace Imesh (bearshare) under Linux. And then, my iLumina Bible is also another software that is stoping me from waving a goodbye to windows. On my computer i have a Dictionary server which i use with Kdict, it allows me to look up terms without having to access the internet, since i have it set for localhost, and you can install different languages, too. For an Encyclopedia, you can install WikipediaFS, i suppose, or do what rayzoredge said and run MS Encarta or Encyclopedia Britannica through WINE. It may not be as good as iLumina Bible, but there is BibleTime; i recommend version 1.63b, 1.64 seems a little buggy. You can use Bibledit to make a Bible for Bibletime if you want. As for peer-to-peer programs, there are popular ones for Linux. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 66 Joined: 17-October 07 From: Canada Member No.: 51,664 |
Post
#5
Oct 20 2007, 07:02 PM
why don't just use both OS. i use double OS in my PC and it works fine. the things that make me hard to leave windows os are games and softwares.. if only linux can provide emulator, a perfect emulator which can run windows program perfectly..
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,084 Joined: 22-June 05 From: 127.0.0.1 — no place like it. Member No.: 8,528 myCENT:4.52 |
Post
#6
Oct 20 2007, 08:41 PM
QUOTE(mc05w37 @ Oct 20 2007, 03:02 PM) [snapback]352255[/snapback] the things that make me hard to leave windows os are games and softwares.. if only linux can provide emulator, a perfect emulator which can run windows program perfectly.. Cedega has more game support than WINE, because its main goal is Linux gaming. And you could use a virtual machine to run Windows and its software like VMware Server. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 66 Joined: 17-October 07 From: Canada Member No.: 51,664 |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 6,938 Joined: 21-September 04 From: 9r33|\| 399$ 4|\|D 5P4/\/\ Member No.: 1,218 ![]() myCENT:43.60 |
Post
#8
Oct 20 2007, 09:53 PM
Odo are using this on your new computer that you posted earlier about it, if so just dual boot like mc05w37 mention since you have ample power and room to do it, heck if you wanted to you could triple boot the system with vista or Windows 9x/Me.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,093 Joined: 3-August 04 From: Nigeria Member No.: 569 |
Post
#9
Oct 22 2007, 02:19 PM
Actually, I am multibooting my computer currently. QUOTE Odo are using this on your new computer that you posted earlier about it, if so just dual boot like mc05w37 mention since you have ample power and room to do it, heck if you wanted to you could triple boot the system with vista or Windows 9x/Me. I havent bought the new PC yet even though I am making serious plans towards purchasing it. I am runing these OSes on my Laptop and the basic config is: Core 2 Duo T5500 1.67GHz, 1.0GB DDR2 667, Intel 945GM Nortbridge and 80GB HDD. So as you can see, dont have much space to play around with and come to think of it that Windows Vista is sitting on a 45GB partition when the Linux OSes can do very well with jUst 10GB. I kinda dont like the way Windows utilize my HDD. Apart from that, Windows creates swap space per OS while I am using one swap space for me PCLinuxOS 2007 and Granular Linux 0.9 And also consider the fact that I only need less than 1/4 of what Windows Uses as its swap space. BTW, I have also noticed that on EXT2, with which I have formatted my Linux partitions, my HDD performs better in the sense that data transfer is much faster. On Windows, the transfer rate (judging from Windows Vista's calculations) is generally between 7 - 10MB/s because of the NTFS file and folder compression which I have enabled on my backup partition (I am saying this based on the transfer speed of this particular partition) while on Linux, it can go up tp 18 - 19MB/s. This is a lot of improvement compared to what Windows has to offer. If only I can get everything I need on Linux, I would wave a goodbye to Windows. For now, I am gonna continue triple booting my laptop. Might even go to a quad boot. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 168 Joined: 21-February 07 Member No.: 38,999 |
Post
#10
Oct 23 2007, 09:23 PM
QUOTE(mc05w37 @ Oct 20 2007, 03:02 PM) [snapback]352255[/snapback] why don't just use both OS. i use double OS in my PC and it works fine. the things that make me hard to leave windows os are games and softwares.. if only linux can provide emulator, a perfect emulator which can run windows program perfectly.. In his case, I believe you can completely transfer 100% to linux! Here's your solutions: 1. MS Encarta -> Wikipedia.org 2. iMesh -> FrostWire for linux (so much faster) 3. iLumina Bible -> BibleGateway.com There you go. now move to linux! LOL |
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
0 | triggerhappy | 176 | 28th October 2008 - 01:11 AM Last post by: triggerhappy |
||
![]() |
4 | bluedragon | 599 | 27th June 2008 - 01:38 PM Last post by: rvalkass |
||
![]() |
5 | Evil man | 2,151 | 23rd June 2007 - 06:34 PM Last post by: rize619 |
||
![]() |
7 | jailbox | 647 | 6th September 2004 - 11:53 AM Last post by: synderoxide |
||
![]() |
2 | gpinvest | 963 | 19th July 2006 - 12:10 PM Last post by: Florisjuh |
||
![]() |
2 | dontmaimyourself | 663 | 2nd August 2004 - 08:55 AM Last post by: Spectre |
||
![]() |
16 | pr3dr49 | 1,199 | 9th August 2004 - 06:39 PM Last post by: popac |
||
![]() |
63 | BoSZ | 6,120 | 25th December 2008 - 05:52 PM Last post by: buxgoddess |
||
![]() |
11 | stingray001 | 1,237 | 1st August 2006 - 04:46 PM Last post by: gaggu121 |
||
![]() |