|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 623 Joined: 7-May 06 From: USA Member No.: 23,230 ![]() |
Post
#11
Jun 21 2006, 07:39 PM
I think the sony PS3 will be the top selling, best video gaming system ever. It has mtion sensitive controllers, and HD DVD Player, the best graphics, and more. It blows the 360 away. Now, many of you are complaining about the PS3 price, but think about this. The top XBOX 360 Gaming system is 400$. The worst PS3 one, is 500$, but also 2x better. So all in all, the price is about fair, because if the PS3 has so many fetures, it will cost more than the 360, which is almost no different than the XBOX |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 936 Joined: 14-April 05 From: West Chester, PA Member No.: 5,636 |
Post
#12
Jun 21 2006, 07:44 PM
First of all, the console is supposed to be around 600 - 700 when it comes out. However, as we all know, the first flood of consoles will only come is a bundle like usual so expect it to come in at roughly $1000. However, for all of you that this they are being selfish, the cost of manufacturing the console itself leads them to lose mony on the system and you have to take into account the research and development of the console, the programmers for the firmware and the development kit, the testers, etc and that costs lots of money. They dont expect to come out a head at first but in the long run they will. All system creators lose money on the console itself but make money on the games, rights, and so forth.
|
![]() Group: Members
Posts: 22 Joined: 31-July 05 Member No.: 10,092 |
Post
#13
Jun 21 2006, 08:06 PM
I agree with fffantics.... all companys lose money makeing consals..Before the ps series game out Sony was already a super industrie i didnt need the system to keep it going and it still dont the reason the price is so high is to pay for the finaces... As He siad the moneys in the games not the consal
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 323 Joined: 4-June 06 Member No.: 24,722 |
Post
#14
Jun 21 2006, 08:21 PM
QUOTE(husker @ Jun 21 2006, 08:39 PM) [snapback]260262[/snapback] I think the sony PS3 will be the top selling, best video gaming system ever. It has mtion sensitive controllers, and HD DVD Player, the best graphics, and more. It blows the 360 away. Now, many of you are complaining about the PS3 price, but think about this. The top XBOX 360 Gaming system is 400$. The worst PS3 one, is 500$, but also 2x better. So all in all, the price is about fair, because if the PS3 has so many fetures, it will cost more than the 360, which is almost no different than the XBOX Yes but the cheapest ps3 (20 gb) doesnt even support online gaming and the ps3 doesnt have a hd dvd player it has blu ray witch for at least a few months will not have any films available and due to sony being very selfish with the rights to make blu ray players, blu ray may be an infirior format, like vhs is now. i know that blu ray holds more but hd movies will not use all that space and alot of space will be left. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#15
Jan 2 2009, 03:51 PM
*cough* It is VERY cheap considering that PlayStation include so many features: Blu-Ray Optical Disc Drive 80GB Hard Drive Bluetooth Wireless Ethernet High Definition I dunno, but for $1000 it is suprisingly cheap, Blu-Ray itself is $1000. Stop complaining because it costs Sony $500 to make an 80GB PlayStation 3... They do need to make a profit you know |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 230 Joined: 14-December 08 From: United States Member No.: 74,596 myCENT:11.06 |
Post
#16
Jan 3 2009, 04:05 AM
The PS3 price was rather expensive when it was first released but now it has dropped a bit. But when you compare its processor and functions with the other gaming consoles out there (Xbox and Wii, and then look at the prices) it does seem reasonable enough. In terms of processor and features it is a MASSIVE step up from the PS2 and yes the price is as well. Still, I think it is worth the price tag and I would buy one. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#17
Jan 3 2009, 05:25 AM
Okay, your argument is mostly about the hardware, is it not? If so, consider the fact that on every game system sold, the manufacturer gets almost no money, if any at all, and sometimes even get back *less* than it costed them to produce the system in the first place. Their money is earned by the games and accessories sold, not by the systems. Now, consider the media player(blue ray) that is in the PS3, and compare it to HD in the 360. Obviously the blue ray will cost more. So comparing the two really isn't any good. Not to mention PS3 has blue ray and built in wifi(doesn't it?) whereas the 360 does not. Again, consider that the ps3 has free online play(did with ps2 at least, I don't have a ps3 to confirm) but the 360 you have to pay $60 a year to play online. To better explain the losses that are incurred, check out the following link: http://www.bit-tech.net/news/2008/05/15/so...each-ps3-sold/1 According to that, Sony admits to losing $130 on every PS3 sold, but the real figures are more like $260 lost per console. So...Don't base your hatred for the companies on how much they charge for their systems. It's the game prices that matter. And being that blank blue ray's run $25-30 on the normal market, asking $60 for a game that is on blue ray isn't too bad I don't think. Just assume you're paying $30 for the game, whereas with wii/360 you are paying more like $40. Overall, the PS3 is the better deal, |
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
4 | kudmus | 1,173 | 6th January 2009 - 08:07 AM Last post by: kudmus |
|||
![]() |
2 | grrlfromoz | 4,548 | 23rd September 2004 - 02:51 PM Last post by: dundun2007 |
|||
![]() |
3 | DataHead | 3,243 | 31st August 2004 - 02:29 AM Last post by: Spectre |
|||
![]() |
21 | alex1985 | 7,230 | 8th November 2009 - 03:55 AM Last post by: iG-kapila |
|||
![]() |
5 | pbrugge | 3,850 | 25th October 2004 - 08:32 PM Last post by: Oblivion 9999 |
|||
![]() |
13 | bowti3 | 9,374 | 5th June 2006 - 11:10 AM Last post by: peo |
|||
![]() |
3 | Davor | 4,550 | 10th February 2005 - 08:24 PM Last post by: Becca |
|||
![]() |
0 | dontmaimyourself | 4,058 | 26th January 2005 - 06:07 PM Last post by: dontmaimyourself |
|||
![]() |
7 | quiksilver | 5,602 | 1st March 2005 - 03:17 AM Last post by: quiksilver |
|||
![]() |
0 | ownd | 3,332 | 13th February 2005 - 12:07 AM Last post by: ownd |
|||
![]() |
10 | orbital2005 | 7,282 | 20th February 2005 - 10:37 PM Last post by: superstu212 |
|||
![]() |
0 | Bash | 4,310 | 16th February 2005 - 03:21 PM Last post by: Bash |
|||
![]() |
1 | djstarskream | 1,535 | 30th December 2007 - 09:54 PM Last post by: truefusion |
|||
![]() |
14 | talbotda13 | 8,926 | 8th April 2005 - 03:40 AM Last post by: catforum |
|||
![]() |
16 | One Shot 1 | 18,091 | 2nd November 2008 - 03:03 PM Last post by: minimcmonkey |
|||
|
Open Discussion | Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 09:49 AM |
Web Hosting Powered by ComputingHost.com.