IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



Tags
This content has not been tagged yet

Plasma Monitors Vs Lcd Monitors

, the true history and risks behind this new technology


What do you prefer LCD or PLASMA?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total Votes: 27
Guests cannot vote 
keysmaker
no avatar
Member [Level 1]
****
Group: Members
Posts: 69
Joined: 29-January 06
From: mmm nice question, maybe you can found me at google earth.... try doing full zoom anywhere..
Member No.: 17,836



Post #1 post Mar 5 2006, 11:16 PM
well, i sure that you recently heard about LCD and Plasma monitors, but .... do you know whats the diference between them, well, its HUGE and you must be very careful if you are going to buy one of these:

QUOTE
1- Life span, the number of viewing hours a monitor provides before dimming to half brightness, is one of the biggest advantages LCD has over plasma. Though the numbers vary among the different brands, plasma displays generally offer around 20,000 hours, while LCD sets last for up to 50,000 hours.


Point for LCD

QUOTE

2- One of plasma technology's known issues is something called burn-in. It happens when your television shows a still image or an icon for so long that its "ghost" remains on the screen. For example, if a stock ticker or a news crawl continuously runs along the bottom of your display, that strip may be burned into your set.
To their credit, LCDs don't suffer from burn-in, nor do they have troubles at high altitudes, where the air-pressure differential causes plasmas to emit an irritating buzzing sound. So, if you live at the top of a mountain, we don't recommend that you get a plasma, though some manufacturers are selling special sets that they claim are immune to the problem.

Another Point for LCD

QUOTE
3- A general rule of thumb is that plasmas deliver better home-theater performance than LCDs. The difference is due mostly to the fact that LCD monitors typically can't display black as well as plasmas; it ends up closer to dark gray. That shortcoming decreases the amount of detail you can see in the shadows and ultimately leaves the picture looking less three-dimensional.

Point for Plasma monitor

QUOTE
Price-to-size ratio
While neither LCD nor plasma monitors are a bargain, on a price-per-square-inch basis, plasmas currently have the edge. Look at it this way: technically, a 42-inch plasma gives you almost twice as much screen real estate as a 30-inch LCD panel, but they both go for about US$3,000. By 2005, you may see 37-inch LCDs hitting that price, but larger versions (50 inches or more) won't cost the same as their plasma equivalents for a while.

Point for........well, this depends if you want size or quality...

For me the winner is LCD, because the burn-in risk is something really bad if you pay $3.000 for a Plasma monitor of 42" against $1,279.99 for a LCD of 32"
The final decision is yours...
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
3 Pages V   1 2 3 >  
Start new topic
Replies (1 - 9)
rvalkass
no avatar
apt-get moo
****************
Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,782
Joined: 28-May 05
From: Devon, England
Member No.: 7,593
Spam Patrol
myCENT:61.50



Post #2 post Mar 6 2006, 07:14 PM
I prefer LCD as I think they have better quality than plasmas, and also people seem to have better experiences with them, whereas people with plasmas tend to send them back every few months due to screen-burn, dead pixels or the whole screen becoming extra dull/bright.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
selim
no avatar
Advanced Member
*******
Group: Members
Posts: 126
Joined: 10-September 05
Member No.: 11,702



Post #3 post Mar 7 2006, 12:33 AM
Useful bit of information this. I knew one of them caused burn in but wasn't sure which. I'll try and remember this for the future when I get a TV of my very own.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
realthor
no avatar
Super Member
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 202
Joined: 7-November 05
Member No.: 13,928



Post #4 post Mar 7 2006, 11:57 AM
Thanks for the information keysmaker. Pretty interesting, as i don't even consider plasmas i didn't know of the burn-in effect but i knew about kuilcky loosing contrast due to the gas inside and thus colours get diluated so no more real black and i've hured they have overheating problems and suck a lot of energy. So they're not for me.
But aren't TFTs more technologically advanced than LCDs? Why wouldn't i prefer a TFT over both tongue.gif ?
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
delivi
no avatar
Trap Grand Marshal Member
***********
Group: [HOSTED]
Posts: 1,320
Joined: 11-January 06
Member No.: 16,932
myCENT:NEGATIVE[-455.29]



Post #5 post Mar 7 2006, 12:44 PM
Plasma displays have lesser Life times than LCD and also have the burn-in problem.

LCD Displays too have shorter lifetime. The display response time is still very less compared to that of CRTs. So it is not suitable heavy graphics intesive works.

So I stickon with my CRT until someone produces a LCD with better respose time and great graphics support and longer life time.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
MaineFishing45
no avatar
Super Member
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 274
Joined: 17-February 06
From: Wellesley, MA
Member No.: 18,774



Post #6 post Mar 7 2006, 03:01 PM
We have a Dell 19" LCD and it works just fine. I mean I play games and do work. Run some webstuff. But with that and Firefox on everything looks sharper than on my school laptop. But I mean LCDs are good b/c they aren't "that" (wacko.gif) expesive and stuff, but they do last longer than Plasmas and Plasmas break down a lot, my friends just burned out after a month and he was calling up support on it....
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
psychiccyberfrea...
no avatar
Super Member
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 425
Joined: 19-October 04
Member No.: 1,831
myCENT:ZERO



Post #7 post Mar 7 2006, 03:20 PM
yeah, you may get better quality for a plasma, but it's not worth it. It's more expensive, and then you have to get a new one every time you need one, plus most LCDs are around the price of a CRT, so it's much better to get an lcd, plus most double as TVs too.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
believer
no avatar
Super Member
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 205
Joined: 3-September 05
Member No.: 11,447



Post #8 post Mar 10 2006, 02:54 AM
thanks for the read, i'm not that familiar yet with plasma displays so for now I cannot speak for it yet. I do have an LCD though and so far it has not given me any problem yet so I'm pretty satisfied for now, maybe if I'm in the market for new display device then I'll check plasma out.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
kawasu
no avatar
Super Member
*********
Group: Members
Posts: 237
Joined: 30-August 04
Member No.: 944



Post #9 post Mar 18 2006, 07:52 AM
i didnt know about the burn in problem and i still preferred lcds. i just think the imge quality on an lcd is better. whe you go up close to a plasma its all pixelated but that doesnt seem to be teh case with lcd screens. the only reason i see for a plasma over lcd is the fact that they're usually alot bigger.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
jmb2006
no avatar
Member [Level 3]
******
Group: Members
Posts: 96
Joined: 7-July 05
Member No.: 9,135



Post #10 post Mar 18 2006, 04:38 PM
my laptop which i am on now has an lcd screen, it attracts loads of dust and other bits just fly onto the screen, i'd much rather prefer a plasma screen to an LCD screen, although LCD screens can be cleaned i've been told Plasma screens dont even need that, just a wipe every now and again. Also when u look at an LCD screen at an angle the colours change.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

3 Pages V   1 2 3 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No New Posts 4 MacFly 2,645 24th January 2005 - 10:46 PM
Last post by: cragllo
No New Posts   5 shadow skazi 1,837 4th February 2005 - 01:27 AM
Last post by: shadow skazi
No New Posts   9 JaVe 4,357 27th March 2005 - 09:50 PM
Last post by: john_meikle
No New Posts   3 -pweb- 1,947 15th March 2005 - 07:31 PM
Last post by: -Hazaa-
No New Posts   1 kvarnerexpress 2,250 27th September 2005 - 09:46 PM
Last post by: dul
No New Posts   12 Pdrive 3,069 5th July 2005 - 05:19 PM
Last post by: silverwoody
No New Posts   8 Damen 2,451 11th June 2007 - 03:09 AM
Last post by: Damen
No New Posts   3 Saint_Michael 1,663 21st November 2005 - 07:43 PM
Last post by: Saint_Michael
No New Posts   10 unicornrose 2,493 1st September 2006 - 06:00 AM
Last post by: Voidless_Shadows
No New Posts 9 oazisklub 1,206 22nd March 2006 - 01:54 PM
Last post by: htdefiant
No New Posts   3 beeseven 683 26th March 2006 - 08:27 AM
Last post by: namanh
No New Posts   12 brandon10092 2,329 24th October 2006 - 02:24 AM
Last post by: techclave
No New Posts   2 PlugComputers 703 25th November 2006 - 04:00 AM
Last post by: paulmason411
No New Posts   7 communitykat 865 9th March 2007 - 10:12 PM
Last post by: Watermonkey
No New Posts   4 masugidsk8r 854 12th July 2007 - 11:19 PM
Last post by: sweetcat


 



RSS Open Discussion Time is now: 26th November 2009 - 06:02 PM

Web Hosting Powered by ComputingHost.com. Xisto.com : Honesty ROCKS! Truth Rules.