|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin
Posts: 1,625 Joined: 11-June 04 From: Somewhere in Time & Space. Member No.: 1 myCENT:NEGATIVE[-78.06] |
Post
#1
Aug 17 2004, 04:47 PM
Even though I am offering so much, ratings at other sites go down because I also have initial packages. I was thinking about just ONE Package with 150 mb space and 1 GB BW! @ 50 posts. And users are supposed to be active. Please post your comments and suggestions.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 270 Joined: 15-August 04 Member No.: 815 |
Post
#2
Aug 17 2004, 04:54 PM
so wait we post 50 and we can get 150mb and 1gb bandwidth, o u are so awesome man ur too kind |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 1,952 Joined: 11-July 04 From: under the stars Member No.: 76 myCENT:67.66 |
Post
#3
Aug 17 2004, 05:16 PM
admin, i thought you're planning on having 101MB space + 5GB bandwidth package? posts count will not be a problem for most of us who are really into trap17. it's best if we just stick to one package from hereon. too much changes within a span of days will just confuse members, future and present. also, sticking to one package with a determined number of GOOD posts (in this case, 50), will thresh out those "fly-by-night" members who just come in here for a "free ride" without contributing helpful posts to other forum members. i would opt for your earlier plan of having a higher bandwidth allotment for members, IF possible. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 193 Joined: 30-July 04 From: Lebanon Member No.: 293 |
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 270 Joined: 15-August 04 Member No.: 815 |
Post
#5
Aug 17 2004, 08:59 PM
thats quite good, meaning less active members will be forced to be active |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 385 Joined: 7-August 04 From: UK Member No.: 703 |
Post
#6
Aug 17 2004, 10:08 PM
yea, i think 1gb bandwidth a little too low. there's a lot of people who look for higher bandwidth, so maybe increasing the bandwidth to at least 2gb would be great!
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 528 Joined: 14-July 04 Member No.: 90 |
Post
#7
Aug 18 2004, 12:27 AM
keep the hosting packages but make the post counts required alot higher, that will sort out the people that are going to stay and the overnight, posters
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admin
Posts: 1,625 Joined: 11-June 04 From: Somewhere in Time & Space. Member No.: 1 myCENT:NEGATIVE[-78.06] |
Post
#8
Aug 18 2004, 01:50 AM
Then May be 150 MB with 1.5 GB BW. The thing is some people as I have seen don't knw what to upload and webdesigning stuff. I had atleast 10 members who uploaded BMP files each about 400 - 2000 Kb.. So, I think so much is enough.. I will give upgrades to serious people who have a good site. ( which do not post BMP files and downloads )
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 528 Joined: 14-July 04 Member No.: 90 |
Post
#9
Aug 18 2004, 05:29 AM
thats a fair enough call. Make it 75-100 posts i think because that obviously means that are going to stay. It may be tough but hey. And yeah, give out more to the more serious web users who's sites are bringing in hits 4 u and <- snipped -> }}}}
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 270 Joined: 15-August 04 Member No.: 815 |
Post
#10
Aug 18 2004, 08:03 AM
yeh i dont mind my site is gonna be for my clan but im commited to trap17 so im gonna be active. i need that much space and stuff for my forum and site and databases. ill probably go for upgrade when i reach that many posts.
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | -danciens- | 3,843 | 27th January 2008 - 06:19 PM Last post by: jlhaslip |
|||
![]() |
8 | X3r0X | 28,526 | 19th July 2004 - 09:20 PM Last post by: OpaQue |
|||
![]() |
2 | -liaowan001- | 25,700 | 20th June 2004 - 12:11 PM Last post by: OpaQue |
|||
![]() |
36 | chelcy | 83,375 | 3rd September 2009 - 01:08 PM Last post by: alexthemans |
|||
![]() |
1 | wassie | 20,681 | 21st June 2004 - 01:27 PM Last post by: OpaQue |
|||
![]() |
61 | OpaQue | 107,982 | 14th August 2009 - 01:19 PM Last post by: rvalkass |
|||
![]() |
0 | OpaQue | 782,051 | 12th July 2004 - 08:48 PM Last post by: OpaQue |
|||
![]() |
2 | KooL | 23,117 | 30th July 2004 - 02:47 PM Last post by: OpaQue |
|||
![]() |
3 | Shackman | 24,105 | 14th July 2004 - 06:39 AM Last post by: Shackman |
|||
![]() |
0 | OpaQue | 21,395 | 14th July 2004 - 09:37 AM Last post by: OpaQue |
|||
![]() |
7 | Ariel | 26,426 | 15th July 2004 - 09:41 PM Last post by: Ariel |
|||
![]() |
1 | -winamp- | 20,618 | 15th July 2004 - 01:33 PM Last post by: wassie |
|||
![]() |
2 | cateye999 | 20,218 | 15th July 2004 - 07:05 PM Last post by: wassie |
|||
![]() |
30 | pop | 7,838 | 31st October 2009 - 03:11 PM Last post by: TheDarkHacker |
|||
![]() |
1 | Jasontian | 1,643 | 8th December 2007 - 03:59 AM Last post by: jlhaslip |
|||
|
Open Discussion | Time is now: 22nd November 2009 - 02:21 AM |
Web Hosting Powered by ComputingHost.com.