|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 1,130 Joined: 23-January 05 From: Valley of Darkness Member No.: 3,388 myCENT:72.30 |
Post
#11
Sep 16 2009, 08:28 PM
QUOTE Hmm... I would choose FireFox over Internet Explorer except for the fact that FF seems to use Java. I've noticed the ram taken up by the browser is huge compared to that of IE. Firefox doesn't use java. You've to install java add-ons only if you wish to view browser contents. So that makes it browser runtime. Firefox is not written in java and it is not using java for it's underlying operation. If you check the Help > About Mozzila Firefox you'll find following details. Atleast i got this from my Mozilla. CODE Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12; .NET CLR 1.1.4322) Gecko/20080201 Firefox/2.0.0.12 From this information i can say that it is not built on java. But it is built on .NET. As .NET is also like java i.e it uses VM. So expect similar performance from it. If you compare FF with chrome then you'll find boost in performance. Why ? Cause Chrome on windows is written on ATL. For more information about ATL/WTL you can check chromium developement site. I used to think that opera is written in java, but i was wrong on that. None of leading browsers are written using java. C++ is used for developing browsers. Variations in C++ could be there but atleast there is C++ behind it. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: [MODERATOR]
Posts: 2,725 Joined: 22-June 05 From: 127.0.0.1 — no place like it. Member No.: 8,528 myCENT:40.50 |
Post
#12
Sep 16 2009, 10:35 PM
If Windows didn't come bundled with a browser, how would i be able to download other browsers? I would at least require it to download other browsers on Windows, since there's no such thing as a repository, like in Linux, where i can search and download all kinds of browsers from. It doesn't matter if it were Internet Explorer or something else, i would still require a browser with download capabilities to be able to navigate to the website of my favorite browser and download it from there. So, in other words, yes, i would still use it, but not for anything other than what is "necessary."
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#13
Sep 16 2009, 11:23 PM
that's why have firfox AND the firfox installation program on my usb drive. i have never used ie on a new install. sometime a website will require ie. that's the only time i will use it....usually it's a microsoft website haha If Windows didn't come bundled with a browser, how would i be able to download other browsers? I would at least require it to download other browsers on Windows, since there's no such thing as a repository, like in Linux, where i can search and download all kinds of browsers from. It doesn't matter if it were Internet Explorer or something else, i would still require a browser with download capabilities to be able to navigate to the website of my favorite browser and download it from there. So, in other words, yes, i would still use it, but not for anything other than what is "necessary." |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 541 Joined: 2-December 08 From: The great north Member No.: 74,056 myCENT:10.17 |
Post
#14
Sep 17 2009, 12:03 AM
I stopped using Internet Explorer so long ago it isn't funny. It is a virus trap as well as prone to crashing constantly. While Firefox is not perfect, it is certainly better than Internet Explorer. I don't know why Microsoft doesn't just bundle it(Firefox) with their new operating systems or just build an entirely new browser from scratch. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#15
Sep 22 2009, 08:13 AM
QUOTE If Windows didn't come bundled with a browser, how would i be able to download other browsers? lol that's a good question, and while there is a sensible answer (i.e. getting the installation program from another source), one has to agree that it is convenient to download stuff like that instead of getting it from a cd or elsewhere. And I don't think one will get into trouble by using IE to download some other browser. |
![]() ![]() |
Post
#16
Sep 22 2009, 10:41 AM
one thing that i like in FF is the drag and drop tabs. but i donno in latest version of IE if they already have that feature too
This post has been edited by eurobeat: Sep 22 2009, 10:43 AM |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#17
Sep 22 2009, 05:06 PM
No, why would anyone use Internet Explorer if it wasn't bundled with Windows? I've asked some people why they don't want to try Firefox, and the reason is always something along the lines of "I don't feel like downloading a whole new browser when I already have one that seems to work just fine." If they didn't have that excuse, anyone would take Firefox or Opera, unless of course they'd only heard of Internet Explorer.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#18
Sep 22 2009, 05:37 PM
It'd be awesome if windows came with Firefox built-in. But yeah, as truefusion said, how in the world would we download a browser on a clean and fresh copy of Windows? We'd need a disc or something that HAS the software preburned onto it along with other programs. (Like ComputerBuyer) or PC World dics etc., but no. I wouldn't use Internet Explorer if it wasnt bundled with Windows. Internet Explorer sucks, and that's that. It'll never get better, all bug fixes repaired since Microsoft sucks. However, other people have their own opinions about each and every browser they use.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Post
#19
Sep 28 2009, 02:24 AM
Internet Explorer is quite heavy and slow browser. I have used chrome IE and firefox.... but found firefox the best. Firefox is more fast reliable and more secure.
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members
Posts: 230 Joined: 2-November 08 From: Lithuania, Vilnius Member No.: 71,241 myCENT:39.30 |
Post
#20
Sep 28 2009, 06:04 AM
I wouldn't use IE even if it would be bundled So I practically wouldn't use it, but would install it. |
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
5 | bluedragon | 2,162 | 17th October 2009 - 02:34 PM Last post by: iG-drew |
|||
![]() |
7 | jailbox | 10,835 | 6th September 2004 - 11:53 AM Last post by: synderoxide |
|||
![]() |
6 | livepcportal | 46 | Today, 12:55 AM Last post by: The Simpleton |
|||
![]() |
2 | dontmaimyourself | 11,844 | 2nd August 2004 - 08:55 AM Last post by: Spectre |
|||
![]() |
17 | pr3dr49 | 24,355 | 18th March 2009 - 07:08 AM Last post by: aloKNsh |
|||
![]() |
25 | stingray001 | 6,070 | 11th May 2009 - 01:20 AM Last post by: artsemail2000 |
|||
![]() |
10 | zhangzy | 19,360 | 24th September 2004 - 01:58 PM Last post by: goranche |
|||
![]() |
5 | stevey | 10,336 | 20th August 2004 - 06:14 PM Last post by: Spectre |
|||
![]() |
14 | Thunder | 23,038 | 24th September 2004 - 01:25 AM Last post by: akz |
|||
![]() |
19 | dundun2007 | 27,822 | Yesterday, 02:08 AM Last post by: FruitRocks |
|||
![]() |
3 | annylei | 7,989 | 28th August 2004 - 08:21 PM Last post by: Triple X |
|||
![]() |
13 | tonyused | 2,798 | 7th February 2009 - 12:08 PM Last post by: Ash-Bash |
|||
![]() |
4 | stevey | 9,631 | 28th September 2009 - 06:29 AM Last post by: donneo |
|||
![]() |
11 | Zenchi | 16,966 | 14th October 2004 - 12:04 PM Last post by: NTNguyen |
|||
![]() |
1 | farh1n | 5,344 | 11th August 2007 - 02:21 PM Last post by: odomike |
|||
|
Open Discussion | Time is now: 21st November 2009 - 11:32 AM |
Web Hosting Powered by ComputingHost.com.